• Home Page
  • How Did John Marshall Influence The Supreme Court?

How Did John Marshall Influence The Supreme Court?

Improved Essays
Show More
On President John Adams last day in office in 1803, he named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the district of columbia. John Adams signed the commissions and Secretary of State John Marshall sealed them, but they were not delivered by the end of Adams’s presidential term. Thomas Jefferson refused to honor the commissions because they were not delivered by the end of John Adams’s term. William Marbury was one of the justices of the peace appointed by John Adams on the last day of his term. Marbury petitioned for the Supreme Court of the United States to issue a writ of mandamus to Thomas Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, to compel him to issue the commissions. Chief justice John Marshall concluded that William Marbury did have a right to the commission. The commission takes effect …show more content…
If the court gave in and required James Madison to deliver the commission and Madison did not, the Court would have no way to force him to comply, and the Court would seem weak. If the Court did not act, it would seem like they ignored the case because they feared Madison would not comply. The Supreme Court decided to turn to the constitution. They concluded that William Marbury was entitled to his commission, but that the constitution did not authorize issuing a writ of mandamus to James Madison. The dispute revolved around the difference between the Court’s original jurisdiction, and its appellate jurisdiction. If the Court has original jurisdiction, it means that the case can go right through to the Supreme Court and make the Court the first ones to decide on the case. If the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, the case must first be decided by lower courts. Marbury brought his case under original jurisdiction, so the Court ruled that it would be a poor exercise of the Court’s original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court Case Of Marbury V. Madison
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court Case Of Marbury V. Madison

    The final reason was that the Supreme Court declared the law of Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional because it granted too much power to the court above the Constitution. The final decision of the case showed that Jefferson’s secretary, James Madison had no right to prevent William Marbury from taking his office as a justice of peace. But on the other hand the Supreme Court has no power to force Jefferson and his secretary to let Marbury take his position because they would ignore what the court says. The law upon which Marbury’s claim was based on was declared by Chief Justice John Marshall unconstitutional . So after all that happened William Marbury could not become a justice of peace of the district…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalist Balance Of Power
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Functionalist Balance Of Power

    An attempt at such an explicit enumeration and delimitation of the Executive office's powers would have been a Sisyphean task for the majority to undertake, for it would have required them to draw lines in the Constitution that even the original framers were unable to draw. A similar concern over the balance occurs also in the case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, where Justice Jackson laid down his three criteria for the judgment of Executive legitimacy when taking certain courses of action. Such boundaries seem formalist on the surface but, taken in light of Chief Justice Black's absolutist majority opinion which ruled that the President may take no action whatsoever unless sanctioned by either Congress or the Constitution, Jackson's concurrence is decidedly functionalist. His provisions were a direct response to the overly formalist dictate made by Black, a dictate which would have rendered the President nothing more than a Congressional lackey. Jackson attempted to circumvent this outcome by creating open-ended limitations in order to provide the President with a degree of latitude when taking action.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Interpretation Of The 14th Amendment
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interpretation Of The 14th Amendment

    It rejected the interpretation of the plaintiff’s due process clause but held the door open for later cases holding that “the states could not encroach upon fundamental principles of liberty and justice”. In examining the history of both the Bill of right and the 14th Amendment one can see the reluctance of the court to take two articles whose original intent was a far cry from the purposes that the court had before it. The court was being asked to take an article written to protect former slaves and the Bill of Right which was specifically written to apply to the federal government only and to merge the two thus incorporating the Bill of Right through the 14th…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief
    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief

    A writ of mandamus is a specific court order because it is made without the benefit of the judicial process or before a case has contemplated. It may be expressed by a court at any time that it is appropriate. Usually, it is issued in a case that has already started. (Eric Foner and John A. Garraty) The Supreme had announced for the very first time that a law had been passed by Congress and had been signed by the President unconstitutionally; after John Marshall, Chief Justice, wrote: “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” However, Marshall believed that the Supreme Court should have an equal role to the other two branches of the government. (Milestone Documents in the National Archives) John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and Jams Madison gave the executive and legislative branches powers that would limit each other as well as the judiciary branch.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Research Paper

    However, Chief Justice John Marshall didn’t follow through because he felt the Constitution didn’t grant the Supreme Court the power to do this, even though the Judiciary Act of 1789 did. Marshall realized that Congress had exceeded its power and, according to the Constitution, the decision was left to the Courts (History.com Staff, 2009). This inconsistency led to judicial review, which not only emphasized the Supreme Court’s power to be the final interpreter of the Constitution and “supreme law of the land”, but made the government recognize the Judicial Branch as equal and necessary (“Marbury v. Madison…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury V. Madison: Benchmark United States Supreme Court Case
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marbury V. Madison: Benchmark United States Supreme Court Case

    Marbury petitioned the Supreme court to force the new secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver the remaining documents. Marbury sought mandamus in the supreme court, requiring James Madison to deliver his commission, through this commission Marbury was to be appointed as justice of the peace for Washington County in the District of Columbia. However, it was ruled that Court had no jurisdiction to force the new president Jefferson and Madison to seat Marbury. In writing the decision, John Marshall (Chief justice) argued that acts of congress in line with the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of John Adams: The Second President Of The United States
    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of John Adams: The Second President Of The United States

    States’ rights is the idea that the union binding United States is an agreement between the states and that they therefore overrule federal law. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Kentucky resolution and James Madison the Virginia resolution. The resolutions had to be brought to state legislature because it was not yet established that the Supreme Court could declare laws unconstitutional. The general idea of both resolutions was that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional and therefore states have the right to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional. Republicans also argued that the Sedition Act was violating the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of speech (Davidson 300-301).…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Should Judges Make Law
    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should Judges Make Law

    It is based on the Latin Maxim Stare Decisis, which means to stand by the decided, but only if the facts before the judges are the same or similar. Precedent is a rigid system as a decision by a higher court in an earlier case, must be followed by a lower court in a later, similar case, so there is no scope for judicial creativity. In order for precedent to later, similar case, so there is no scope for judicial creativity. In order for precedent to operate it is necessary for there to be a court hierarchy. The decisions of the higher court bind lower courts and some of the courts are also bound by their own previous…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Supreme Court
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Supreme Court

    The settlers had wanted to stay far away from the tyrannical type of government they had just fled. This point by Brutus should have caused more discussion since it showed clearly that the proposed justice system lacked more of a balance than the British parliamentary system. The response by Hamilton in Federalist #78, written just two months later, defended the independence of the court. Hamilton argued that the courts isolation would actually inhibit it from attaining any harmful power. Hamilton argued that without the power of the “sword or purse”, it could not hold weight against the other branches.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Restraint: Case Study
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Restraint: Case Study

    That being said, just because a case comes to the court with a legitimate problem does not mean the court can rule on it. There is an example of this in the ruling of the apportionment case Baker v Carr and the cases that preceded it. In the cases preceding Baker v Carr the court could not rule because the cases were brought under violation of the grantee clause; in these cases the court could not rule because it could not answer the political question of what a republican form of government is. Finally, when Baker v Carr brought the same issue to the court under violation of the equal protection clause, a ruling was made. All of this is to illustrate that the courts only have select opportunities to rule on impactful policy issues, like malapportionment in Baker v Carr and like same sex marriage in Oberegfell v Hodges.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  CA Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings