Marbury Vs Madison Essay

Decent Essays
Marbury vs. Madison was an event held by the Supreme Court in 1803. The event established the principle that the judicial branch of the Constitution may declare any law unconstitutional. Soon after the Constitution was ratified the judges of the Supreme Court were not very powerful and had little impact in interpreting the meaning of the law.
In November of 1800, John Adams, a member of the Federalist Party, lost a bidding for the reelection of Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, as the president of the United States. The Federalists also lost their control over Congress during the election. Although a few months before the newly elected president took office, John Adams and his Federalist party still had control over Congress. During those months,
…show more content…
Jefferson also learned that not all of the commissions for the judges had been delivered. After hearing this information, the new president ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison to deny the delivery of the commissions. Realizing that he would not be receiving his position as justice of the peace, William Marbury went to the Supreme Court and tried to obtain his commission. He told the Court to order Madison to give him his job. The Supreme Court had the power to issue such an order because of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which created the judicial branch of the federal government. The act provided the number of members of the Supreme Court, the number of lower districts, it introduced the idea that the Supreme Court can settle disputes between states, and the idea that a decision made by the Court is absolutely final.
A unanimous decision was made, and written by Justice Marshall, the Court declared that Marbury and the other judges did have a right to their commission. The Court also declared that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, therefore, Congress could not grant the Supreme Court the power to give Marbury his commission. Thus, the Supreme Court was not able to make Madison appoint Marbury as a justice of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1800, Adams was defeated for reelection by Thomas Jefferson. One of his last actions as president was the Midnight Judges. Adams tried filling the courts with all Federalist judges, all of his appointments were voided except for Chief Justice, John Marshall (O’Brien). Before Jefferson 's inauguration, the Judiciary Act was passed that recognize the federal court system (Israel 38). The Judiciary Act gave the Supreme Court the power to review cases brought against a federal official.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Wert 1). The first being the ability to interpret law which included national and state legislation as well as any constitutional provisions. The second function being the ability to hear national cases consistently while using methods of legal reasoning. The final and most important function was not determined by the delegates however, instead it was born as a result of the Marbury vs. Madison case. The Marbury vs. Madison case questioned the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was put in place to establish the judicial courts of the United States, thus creating the Supreme…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brandon Henderson Professor Dr. Edoh Agbehonou Pols 1101 17 April 2015 The decision between Marbury v. Madison was made under judicial review and is considerably the most important decision in the history of the United States, judicial review is when the doctrine of legislative and executive actions are under review. This case gave the supreme says “The government of the united states is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written” (5 U.S 137). Court the power to limit congressional power.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Provide a fully developed essay of at least 500 words, and cite sources used. Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court also ruled that James Madison withheld William Marbury commission wrongfully. Although the court ruled it wrongfully for Madison to withhold Marbury commission, Chief of Justice John Marshall ruled that William Marbury case must fail, due to section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. (Hudson) The Judiciary Act stated that it was unconstitutional to request the court to issue a writ of mandamus. Chief of Justice John Marshall ruled that Section 13 was unconstitutional and that the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction of William Marbury case.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a benchmark United States Supreme court case in which the court formed the foundation for the exercise of Judicial review under Article 3 of the US constitution. The landmark decision of this case, defined the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the US government. Case Summary The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of Columbia by the president John Adams but whose commission was not later delivered.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall Dbq

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When John Adams appointed Federalists to various judicial positions before his term ended, James Madison discarded 17 commissions for justice of the peace, rather than delivering them to the men appointed. Though many of the men did not care about this position, Marbury filed a suit in the Supreme Court, demanding the order of the commission. John Marshall ruled that Marbury had a right to the commission. However, during this ruling, John Marshall declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Marshall said that this law, the Judiciary Act of 1789, could not be used because it authorized an action which the constitution did not allow.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson Dbq

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In return, Marbury filed a suit to receive his letter. In the Judiciary Act of 1789, the court was given the power to…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Read Chapter 9 through the end of the chapter. b) How did the presence of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention give the Convention greater legitimacy? Because he was the leader of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, George Washington became a highly respected individual following Great Britain’s defeat. As a result of his celebrity, everyone involved in this event agreed to elect him to be chairman, a position which enabled him to serve as a mediator.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the court gave in and required James Madison to deliver the commission and Madison did not, the Court would have no way to force him to comply, and the Court would seem weak. If the Court did not act, it would seem like they ignored the case because they feared Madison would not comply. The Supreme Court decided to turn to the constitution. They concluded that William Marbury was entitled to his commission, but that the constitution did not authorize issuing a writ of mandamus to James Madison. The dispute revolved around the difference between the Court’s original jurisdiction, and its appellate jurisdiction.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judiciary Act of 1801 was, “An Act to provide for the more convenient organization of the Courts of the United States.” The Judiciary Act of 1801 reduced the size of the Supreme Court from six justices to five and eliminated the justices’ circuit duties. This act replaced the justices on the circuit, by creating 16 judge ships for six judicial circuits. The U.S. Circuit Courts over which the new judges were to preside, gained jurisdiction over all cases arising under the Constitution and the acts of the United States. John Adams, leader of the Federalists, signed the Judiciary Act into law on February 13th, 1801.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the election of 1800, President John Adams realized he was losing to the Democratic-Republican candidate Thomas Jefferson. Fearing that the Federalists were going to become the minority party, Adams decides to appoint a substantial number of Federalists to the Justices of Peace in the closing months of his presidency. However, before all of the commissions could be sent out, Thomas Jefferson assumed the presidency on March 5th, 1801. Jefferson immediately notices all of the unsent commissions, and orders the new Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver them. William Marbury, one of Adam's Federalist appointees, noticed that he never received his commission.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a result of the lame duck period, when the power shifted from the federalists when John Adams was president to Thomas Jefferson, a democratic republican. The night before Jefferson went into presidency, Adams appoints a whole load of new judges so federalists could still have some power. William Marbury was supposed to be one of these judges but was not appointed to be one in time because Jefferson became president. Marbury then asked the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to secretary of state, James Madison but Jefferson decided to withdraw all the new commissions and ordered Madison deny them. This called for John Marshall to rule on this argument.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ch. 8: Varieties of American Nationalism Read pages 218-224 (The “Era of Good Feelings”) What were the issues that impacted the U.S. economy following the war of 1812? Some direct things that happened because of war of 1812 included: Westward Surge of migrants being pushed out because they had nowhere to live and farm. Another is an increase in the textile Industry because of more cotton growing in the south.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays