John G. Roberts Supreme Court Style

Improved Essays
The United States Supreme Court is the uppermost federal court on the earth that offers lifetime tenure to a selected few. Justices John G. Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor are currently serving out their lifetime tenures and shaping the landscape of America with their decisions with various cases.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts
Chief Justice John G. Roberts born on January 25, 1955 attended Harvard College and soon Harvard Law. At Harvard, Roberts became the managing editor of the newsletter. After graduating magna cum laude in 1949 he clerked for Judge Henry Friendly of the US Court Circuit of Appeals the 2nd Circuit. He subsequently clerked for then Associate Justice William Rehnquist. After working at the Washington DC law firm Hogan & Hartson, Robert returned to the Justice Department under President George H.W. Bush as the Principal Deputy Solicitor General. During Clinton's
…show more content…
Supreme Court to be seen as less political arguing that the public's confidence in the institution. Most people question whether or not Roberts is yielding to the liberal side. Roberts changed his vote in the first Affordable Care Act in 2012. Roberts preferred a narrow ruling in Citizens United but was persuaded by his conservative counterparts to join which precedent in reversing the decision that shifted everything. Roberts have been a bit more cautious when it comes to his views and his conservative colleagues. Roberts put his attitude into his craft, mentioning that he crafted building an agreement for his judicial opinions by citing the opinions of his fellow counterparts. Roberts have moved the courts decisions by tailoring his arguments and decisions in a way that captures the support of more moderate justices. Over the last fifteen years has created a judicial balance amongst liberals and conservatives

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the interview, Justice Breyer mentions the six tools that justices have at their disposal while they are deciding their opinions. These six tools include text, history, tradition, precedent, purpose, and consequence. Justice Breyer brings up the point that while forming decisions, some Justices give emphasis to the first four of these tools and evade using the final two of the tools because these justices believe that considering purpose and consequence create subjectivity in the formation of opinions. However, by using the tools of purpose and consequence and then openly explaining in either an opinion or dissent how the use of these tools lead to the formation of a decision, Justice Breyer argues that a judge is able to remain objective. This is Justice Breyer, a Developmentalist, defending his interpretational style.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall’s Biography Being the first of fifteen children, John Marshall was already a natural leader. He was a soldier in the Revolutionary War, a successful lawyer, and secretary and most importantly Chief Justice of the United States of America. He was a well-respected man that played important roles throughout his life. A major influence in his teenage years was his father’s good friend, George Washington. John Marshall’s young inspirations, military background, and powerful government leadership led him to be an important figure in U.S. history.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power in the Court John Marshall was one of the most prominent members of the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall is known for producing one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history after his ruling in the well-known case of Marbury v. Madison. During the time he served as Chief Justice, Marshall managed to bring more power to the judicial branch. He did so by working his way up to the highest position in the court, strengthening the unity of the justices, and establishing judicial review.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On President John Adams last day in office in 1803, he named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the district of columbia. John Adams signed the commissions and Secretary of State John Marshall sealed them, but they were not delivered by the end of Adams’s presidential term. Thomas Jefferson refused to honor the commissions because they were not delivered by the end of John Adams’s term. William Marbury was one of the justices of the peace appointed by John Adams on the last day of his term. Marbury petitioned for the Supreme Court of the United States to issue a writ of mandamus to Thomas Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, to compel him to issue the commissions.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antonin Scalia was a very respected leader in his line of work. He was known as a conservative Republican who shared his transformative theories, writing, his unique personality and opinions. Scalia was known as an originalist and a believer in the living constitution. Scalia’s brilliant views made him the leader of the conservative intellectual renaissance in his three decades on the supreme court. Antonin Gregory Scalia was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, as the first Italian American to become a member of the supreme court.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Marshall inherited a functioning Court, then, but one more potentially exposed for the institutional strides it had made and more vulnerable still because it got openly entangles in the violent partisan politics of the 1790s.” (Newmyer, 2001). This quote conveys the fact that Marshall made a rise in the Supreme Court, and the Court was out of sync with the rise of political parties. John Marshall defined roles by creating the power of judicial review in the Supreme Court from the court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Judicial review entrenched the precedent that only the federal courts could interpret the Constitution.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Necessary and proper clause is basically a simple term used in the place of Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States. The necessary and proper clause states: “Congress has the power to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof”. John Marshall was one of the greatest to ever serve as the Chief of Justice. Marshall started his career in the early 1780s. Marshall heard more than a thousand cases and wrote at least 519 decisions.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall: Chief Justice

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Marshall is most famous for being the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding for 34 years. Some would say he was the greatest chief justice of all time. Being a chief justice was not his only role. He was a lawyer, Federalist, Virginia native, husband, father and to some a national hero. Marshall’s legacy lives on and we are reminded time and time again why he was such a fundamental Supreme Court Chief Justice.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the presidential elections of 1948, Warren was a republican candidate; although he did not get elected it was a huge reason of why he was appointed for chief justice. Earl Warren’s life began in Los…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Justice Antonin Scalia

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The supreme court of justice is a group of nine of the most-influential leaders joined together in the most powerful court. 4 Even though there is remorse for his death there has to be another person to fill in that spot. 5 It is the President Obama’s job to choose candidates then make it smaller by the Senate and the Congress. 6 The Republican members of the Congress argued that the president in the following election should be able to choose the next Justice, because President Obama was a Democrat.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I wish we could wave a magic wand and go back to those days when the process was truly bipartisan.” This quote from Justice Ginsburg aptly summarizes the transformation of the the Supreme Court nomination process from its past to its…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When justices on the bench of the United States Supreme Court make their respective decisions on a case, they are faced with two outcomes. The first is that they can decide to overturn a decision from a lower court, deem a federal law unconstitutional, or nullify other federal or state statute. When the Supreme Court changes previous statute or overturns a previous court decision, it is judicial activism. But when the Supreme Court decides to uphold precedent, upholding laws passed by Congress or state legislatures, or strictly adhering to the original text of the Constitution, it is judicial restraint. Although the aforementioned terms do not have any overlap in their definitions, it can often be seen that both of these judicial practices can be implemented in a single Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chief Justice Roberts. He believed that the Supreme Court lacked the jurisdiction to review the decisions of the lower court. He stated that “the Court does not have before it, and the logic of its opinion does not decide, the distinct question whether the States, in the exercise of their historic and essential authority to define the marital relation, may continue to utilize the traditional definition of marriage.” Moreover, he disagreed with the majority’s analysis and he also believed that Congress acted constitutionally in passing the Defense of Marriage Act.…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judiciary Act of 1801 was, “An Act to provide for the more convenient organization of the Courts of the United States.” The Judiciary Act of 1801 reduced the size of the Supreme Court from six justices to five and eliminated the justices’ circuit duties. This act replaced the justices on the circuit, by creating 16 judge ships for six judicial circuits. The U.S. Circuit Courts over which the new judges were to preside, gained jurisdiction over all cases arising under the Constitution and the acts of the United States. John Adams, leader of the Federalists, signed the Judiciary Act into law on February 13th, 1801.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays