Chief Justice: John Marshall

Improved Essays
John Marshall’s life began on September 24, 1755 near the city of Germantown in Virginia. As Marshall was growing up he spent one year of education at Archibald Campbell’s Academy. He then became home schooled by his father Thomas Marshall. As the months past by, John Marshall found himself reading Commentaries on the Laws of England by Blackstone. Reading this book influenced him to become one of the greatest lawyers of all time. He studied law in 1780 by attending lectures at College of William & Mary in Williamsburg. Marshall’s life began to evolve that same year as he started his own law practice. His courts impacted society the development of the powers for our government today. Chief Justice John Marshall developed many ways for ruling …show more content…
Many of his precedents were developed by the despite the disapproval of the Jeffersonian Republicans. The Jeffersonian Republicans were people who believed in a stronger state government, and also distressed about immoderate federal power. John Marshall only believed in states rights in the Constitution, even though The Marshall Court ruled many cases dealing with the states. For example, in the case “Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1818), the state legislature was forbidden to alter the college charter. Because of that, a principle was established that included charters were contracts, so they could not be impaired. In the quote, “No states shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto, or law impairing the obligation of contracts.” (Document K), it emphasizes on prohibiting states from enacting any law that conflicts impairs contract rights. Another example is the case of Maryland v. McCulloch. In this case John Marshall knew that the federal government had more control over currency. In the document, it states “The powers of the general government, it has been said, are delegated by the States, who alone are truly sovereign; and must be exercised in subordination to the States, who alone possess supreme dominion. This great principle is, that the constitution and the laws made in pursuance therefore are supreme; that they control the …show more content…
“Marshall inherited a functioning Court, then, but one more potentially exposed for the institutional strides it had made and more vulnerable still because it got openly entangles in the violent partisan politics of the 1790s.” (Newmyer, 2001). This quote conveys the fact that Marshall made a rise in the Supreme Court, and the Court was out of sync with the rise of political parties. John Marshall defined roles by creating the power of judicial review in the Supreme Court from the court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Judicial review entrenched the precedent that only the federal courts could interpret the Constitution. In the quote, “The act to establish the judicial courts of the United States authorizes the Supreme Court “to issue writs of mandamus, in the cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or a person holding office under the authority the United States”.” (Document G), it implies the “Necessary and Proper Clause” because of the establishment of the judicial courts, it becomes necessary to consider if a jurisdiction can be exercised. Marshall was very strong about the Congress and its orders in the Supreme Court. John Marshall believed that, “congress has a right to punish murder in a fort, or other place within its exclusive jurisdiction; but no general right to punish murder committed within any of the States.”(Faulkner, 1968). This quote supports

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Majority’s reasoning: Marshall delivered the majority opinion and stated that the government is acknowledged by all to have a set of enumerated powers, yet the states are only allowed to exercise the powers granted to the state. The Court found that Congress is not authorized to make all laws, which may have relation to the powers of the government. They are to make laws that seem ‘necessary and proper’ and they are responsible for carrying them into proper…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCulloch vs. Maryland is the court case that brought attention to expansion of federal power to the United States of America. The two main questions on why this case was brought to the Supreme court were…Did Congress have the power to establish the Second Bank of the United States of America? Did Maryland have the power to tax the bank? This case confirmed that Congress did have the power to establish the Bank, and Maryland did not have the power to tax the Bank. The Supreme Court ruled Congress had the power to establish the Bank in Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution using the elastic clause, stating Congress has the power to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution.”…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The McCulloch v Maryland case, presided over by John Marshall, dealt with the legality of the State of Maryland’s decision to place taxes on bank notes chartered from outside of the area. The issue was brought to the national level after James McCulloch, leader of the Second National Bank of the United States within Baltimore, refused to pay the imposed fee. The Supreme Court ultimately sided in his favor, citing the fact that the state had ratified the Constitution and then, the Necessary and Proper Clause. Likewise, Congress possesses powers that are not specifically defined within the supreme law of the land, therefore it is up to the discretion of the Judicial Branch to decide whether or not the intent is reasonable. In this case, they…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice John Marshall, Judge of McCulloch v. Maryland, warned that this could undermined the enumerated powers. This could be prevented with the insertion of a new provision to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17. This provision should state, “Congress must state in each bill it passes the Article, Section, and Clause of the Constitution to which the bill relates.” The Constitution of the United States of America gives Congress many powers,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide” (John Adams). The second main key player is John Marshall (1755–1835). He was the outgoing Federalist Secretary of State and then he became the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1801.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall served as chief judge from 1801 to 1835, and he was the greatest dominance to the Supreme Court that there was no judge can compare. At the outset of his tenure Judge, Supreme Court asserted its power by declaring an Act of Parliament was unconstitutional, that case was Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Marshall's decision in the dilemma seems no escape showed natural talent of his absolute. Marshall declared Section 13 of Act 1789 of Justice is unconstitutional because it empowered instance trial for the Supreme Court beyond the provisions in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the power of the Supreme Court was reconsidered and decided the congressional legislation was unconstitutional had been set.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Litwack Vs Michener

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michener, Marshall, and Litwack have different views about the constitution. There opinions vary about the constitution and what it meant to them. James Michener thought of the constitution as a masterpiece of writing. According to Michener the constitution was written so well that even philosophers are amazed by what it has achieved. Michener thought of the government as a well oiled machine that works very well in unison.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the Court has original jurisdiction, it means that the case can go right through to the Supreme Court and make the Court the first ones to decide on the case. If the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, the case must first be decided by lower courts. Marbury brought his case under original jurisdiction, so the Court ruled that it would be a poor exercise of the Court’s original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in this…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To quote the Federalist No. 78, “The judiciary will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution…. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment.” He believed the judiciary needs to be free from any…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The act provided the number of members of the Supreme Court, the number of lower districts, it introduced the idea that the Supreme Court can settle disputes between states, and the idea that a decision made by the Court is absolutely final. A unanimous decision was made, and written by Justice Marshall, the Court declared that Marbury and the other judges did have a right to their commission. The Court also declared that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, therefore, Congress could not grant the Supreme Court the power to give Marbury his commission. Thus, the Supreme Court was not able to make Madison appoint Marbury as a justice of the…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The legal principle that Chief Justice John Marshall declared in the Marbury vs. Madison was the principle of judicial review. Judicial review states that the Supreme Court has the right to “judge the constitutionality of federal laws.” As a result, to ensure a method of check and balances in the U.S. legal system, the Supreme Court has the authority to overrule the acts of the executive and legislative branches when their actions are not consistent with the U.S.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court invoked the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal government to pass laws not expressly provided for in the Constitution's list of express powers, provided those laws are in useful furtherance of the express powers of Congress under the Constitution. This case established two important principles in constitutional law. First, the Constitution grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the Constitution's express powers, in order to create a functional national government. Second, state action may not impede valid constitutional exercises of power by the Federal government.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his time on the nation’s highest court he would seek to enhance the power of states to expand their abilities to construct policies, as he sought to limit federal power. This culminated successfully with the striking down of laws under the Commerce Power in U.S. versus Lopez. However, as a Chief Justice he would often act as a writer and arbitrator of majority opinions to maintain past precedent and to moderate the decisions of the court. At times even upholding precedent, which he vehemently dissented from originally.…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe it is valid to call the war of 1812 the worst fought war in America. First off, The United States Capitol was burnt down by the British and everything was destroyed except a picture of George Washington and The Colonial Flag. The United States believed that they were going to win Canada 's land and they weren’t able too. The war ended in a tie because they were extremely focused on the French Revolution and Napoleon. Issues within the country also created conflict with the American people.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every part of the United States Constitution has some type of influence whether it be philosophical or historical. Many of our forefathers were educated men. These men came with knowledge and enough influence to put into action the U.S. Constitution; for the protection and betterment of our great nation. One such clause of the U.S. Constitution is the Supremacy Clause. The Supremacy Clause was philosophically influenced by the “Great Charter” or Magna Carta.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays