Justice Antonin Scalia

Decent Essays
At the age of 79, Justice Antonin Scalia passed away in his sleep. 1 He was the most well-known and may he rest in peace. 2 Scalia was in the Supreme Court for about 30 years, he was known for his “blunt and forceful” opinions. 3 The supreme court of justice is a group of nine of the most-influential leaders joined together in the most powerful court. 4 Even though there is remorse for his death there has to be another person to fill in that spot. 5 It is the President Obama’s job to choose candidates then make it smaller by the Senate and the Congress. 6 The Republican members of the Congress argued that the president in the following election should be able to choose the next Justice, because President Obama was a Democrat. 7 They didn’t

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Thomas took a very stern stance on the executive branch having broad authority over the constitution and its federal statuses, this is easily expressed in the Case of Hamdi V. Rumsfeld where he was the only justice to agree that the federal government had the legal right to detain hi stating that since he was an illegal Enemy Combatant that he was not protected under the Geneva convention. Thomas avidly voted for decision that would grant state-governmental authority in cases that involved specifically federalism based limits on the congress authority. Interestingly enough as justice he was on average the most willing to exercise judicial review of federal statues in comparison with state statues he was the least likely to vote against them. Due to past that was filled was constant adversity his view on the bill of rights was very hard pressed on equal rights and the continuing social movent for them to be both recognized and protect this is shown through multiple examples within several of the amendments found in the bill of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Marshall’s tactics to unite the justices was to have all of the men live under the same roof. This way they would be forced to spend most of their time with each other and would get along better with one another. Marshall’s rulings in cases such as Talbot v. Seeman showed everyone Marshall’s potential power and ability to manipulate the system in order to reach the ruling he wants. Undoubtedly, John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. Madison case was his greatest display of his power and knowledge of the system throughout his time as Chief Justice.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Supreme Court is the uppermost federal court on the earth that offers lifetime tenure to a selected few. Justices John G. Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor are currently serving out their lifetime tenures and shaping the landscape of America with their decisions with various cases. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Chief Justice John G. Roberts born on January 25, 1955 attended Harvard College and soon Harvard Law. At Harvard, Roberts became the managing editor of the newsletter.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’m not talking about a sheriff, I’m talking about John Marshall, the fourth Supreme Court Chief Justice. Serving from 1801 until his death in 1835, he became one of the most influential chief justices. He took part of 30 important court cases and influenced the modern day constitution and modern present day. When the United States was starting out, it took a long period of time to establish order.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist 78 Hamilton defends the Constitution’s lifetime tenure of Justices on the Supreme Court. In doing so Hamilton argues that, because of the Court’s particular role and purpose, appointing Justices for life poses no threat to republican governance. To start, Hamilton identifies the duty of the Court as, “to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void,” this is what becomes Hamilton’s definition of judicial review. Those who opposed the Constitution, Antifederalists, argued that the power of judicial review was far too great to be wielded by Justices appointed for life. In response to this Hamilton argued as to why lifetime tenure was, “an indispensable ingredient in,” the efficacy of the Judiciary.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is a powerful and fundamental branch in the current United States government. The unelected justices of the Court are able to strike down legislation that is interpreted as unconstitutional. The Court is able to act as a policy maker and in turn acting as a branch of the legislative body in doing so. Another aspect of the current day Supreme Court is that the justices are able to interpret and make precedents on the “spirit” of the constitution to keep up with the present day social climate. The Supreme Courts use of Judicial Review as established in the case Marbury V Madison, has transformed a United States ruled by Judicial Supremacy.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, it is the Constitutional duty of President Obama to choose his successor. While the Republican party is insisting that a Justice is not chosen until after the next Presidential election, President Obama is determined to fill the position in the next few weeks despite the threats of his nomination being declined. At this time I believe that the best possible candidate to fill the position would be Srikanth Srinivasan. To begin, we should first take a look at what President Obama has stated he is searching for in the next Supreme Court Justice. As mentioned on the SCOTUS blog, the first thing that is important in a nominee is that they must possess a mastery of the law (A Responsibility I Take Seriously).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President does not, however, have control over when vacancies will happen in the Justices. He also has to pass these appointed Justices to the Senate who have to confirm the appointees. The President’s vote is the only one that controls the selection of a Justice. The Senate can only accept or reject the President’s proposal, they cannot choose for the President. Unless he delegates that power to them.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Samuel Anthony Alito

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. is currently a Supreme Court justice and considered to have a rather conservative take on things. He is well known to lean towards making decisions that align with the ideals of a libertarian. On April 1, 1950, Samuel A. Alito Jr. was born in Trenton, New Jersey. He was raised in Hamilton, New Jersey. His father, Samuel A. Alito, emigrated from Italy and both of his parents were school teachers.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ensuing, the devastating death of Antonin Scalia, the obvious question rose as to who President Obama will nominate as a successor to Scalia. Since the court is now leveled between liberals and conservatives, court rulings would often tie if a replacement is not found soon. In court rulings the lower court rulings will stand. Ultimately, this could affect cases such as voting rights, affirmative action, labor unions, abortion, contraception and immigration. Senate Republicans have already made the decision to refuse to confirm before the election, considering they want to leave the decision to the next president.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president has powers to appoint the Supreme Court judges. Article III of our constitution is very by stating that “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United states and Treaties." (Article III, USA constitution). The judicial review seems to be a strong power because most of the arms of the government are kept in check. The legislature and the presidency have to adhere to the constitution as any act may be overturned by the courts if someone successfully petitions.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Marshall was known as the greatest chief justice in history, did you know that the Liberty Bell rang so loudly at his funeral that it cracked? The Constitution of the United States created three branches of government, in which includes the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. These branches were established to ensure that our government is effective, and that citizen’s right are protected. The Judicial branch of the government has the main purpose of interpreting the laws, it keeps the legislative and executive branches in check, and makes decisions that influence us and our country.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays