The Challenges Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964

Great Essays
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 awakened the cognizance of every American within the United States of America’s workforce. Once it was acceptable to deny employment based on discrimination practices. The need for legislative involvement was necessary to combat the discrimination that many educated and capable people were denied honest jobs due to that system. Applicants were literally turned away and prohibited from applying for positions solely based on their race, gender, or religion. Therefore, regulations were legislated to protect applicants and employees from discrimination based upon biased factors. The Civil Rights Act distinctively included a plethora of other categories that were at a high risk of facing discrimination ranging from …show more content…
In 1973 the very first law was passed in an attempt to protect disabled employees. This law was the Rehabilitation Act. Although, this was the first attempt at trying to provide equal employment opportunities for employees with disabilities the act only applied only to federal contractors. In 1990, to further help with protecting disabled individuals in the workplace the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed. Having a broader range than the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission applies to private employers, labor unions that consist of at least fifteen or more employees, and employment agencies, but it does not apply to state government employers. (Valentine, Mathis, & Jackson, 2014, p. 88 and 89). Years after the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed congress saw the need to modify it. The Amendment redefined what it meant to be a person with a disability, expanding the definition. A disabled person as defined by the ADA is described as, “A person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits life activities, who has a record of such an impairment, or who is regarded as having such an impairment.” (Valentine, Mathis, & Jackson, 2014, p. 89). The changes to the …show more content…
Employers are expected to accommodate their existing and new employee’s religious needs to the best of their ability without causing discomfort or problems with other employees or within the company. Not only are employers expected to meet the needs of its employee’s religious beliefs to the best of their ability, but they also cannot discriminate during the hiring process due to an applicant’s religious or spiritual beliefs. Pre-Employment questions or assessments should also not ask the specifics of an applicant’s religious views, due to causing a bias or unfavorable selection during the pre-employment process. No discrimination during the pre-selection process also means that characteristics such as physical appearance or dress preference should not cause discrimination or conflict within the workplace where applicable. What this means for workers is that someone who’s religion causes them to wear certain attire, such as that of Muslim belief that wears head wraps and other full body garments due to their religion will have certain leniencies to dress code policies. The most common exception to this would be if the attire poses a safety threat to the type of work and the environment the staff works in, in this event work

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In 1990, Congress approved the American with Disability Act, providing protection to disabled individuals or citizens from discrimination in different forms. This Act was designed to protect the right of the people with disabilities, and have the same opportunities with those individuals without disabilities enjoy. Title III of ADA of 1990 prohibits discrimination on basis of disability. Modifications are designed to accommodate and give accessibility to disabled people.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no employer can discriminate against an employee based upon race, color, religion, sex or national origin. When Shaun is demoted by Montgomery ’s it was because the customer (Phil) made a false complaint about her supposedly saying a racial slur towards Phil. Thus under federal law Shaun was not discriminated against because the law only applies to undesirable employer actions against employees based upon Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is race, color, sexual orientation, national origin and so on. Shaun being demoted was not based on those examples; it was based on her alleged behavior.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pervious, the amendments to add age to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was rejected. There were several reasons for excluding age from Title VII. First, Congress felt there were not enough information to enacted into legislation. Second, Congress feared adding Age would overload the Civil right measure and as a result cause defeat. Finally, in 1964, Congress did not understand the importance of the Age discrimination problem.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Timeline of Significant Policies Civil Rights Act of 1964: This act made segregation of all public places illegal. Prior to this act, cities could maintain separate facilities for white and black Americans. There were separate schools, buses, businesses, restrooms, hospitals, and theaters. This segregation was made possible by the Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson, which established the policy of “separate but equal.”…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This act ensures that people who live with disabilities have the same rights and opportunities as everyone…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ADAAA Legislative History

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To analyze the development and the legislative history of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), it is important to discover the definition of disability as enacted by the United States Congress. “When Senators Weicker and Larkin first introduced the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA; Public Law No. 101–336 [1990]) in 1988, only 30 percent of people with disabilities in the United States were employed. Title I, the section of the ADA pertaining to employment discrimination, sought to address this persistent no employment among people with disabilities. The law served to extend antidiscrimination provisions of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Public Law No. 93–112 [1973]) to the private sector and to clarify congressional intent…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline: Thesis: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was significant to African Americans because of the act, segregation in public places and employment prejudice on the pigment of skin, national origin, gender, ethnicity, or/and religion was brought to an end. The Civil Rights Act was one of the most momentous events to impact the African American community on the account of bringing equality to minorities and leading to the Voting Rights Act 1965, which added greater strength to minorities in government and in America. The Act made a consequential impact on the presidential election and progressed and rewarded the activists in the African American community. There were great consequences that either progressed a greater movement or added to the…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The civil Rights Act of 1964 is consisted of three different civil Rights acts, the first one is the one that study abuses, the second one is the one that says that the fourteenth amendment cannot be ignored, especially when is related to voting. The third one is about equal pay to women. In the civil Rights of 1964 is when everything started changing for African Americans and also strengthens the first and second Acts. The provisions that came with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were great. All of them were enforced right away but they were not fully accepted for the Caucasians, the accommodations were integrated to daily basis within 10 years after the Civil Rights were passed.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted to protect workers from being penalized based on race, skin color, religion or national origin (). It was intended as a means of protecting individuals from being discriminated against during a time of racial tension in our country. While I do believe that racism, in all forms, still exists today, I do not believe the majority of employers are violating the law, but rather falling victim to the litigious society we have created. It is my personal belief that if a job description has to be altered, standards lowered or certain requirements lifted in order to accommodate a certain individual, we are going too far to accommodate that individual. Of course everyone wants a level playing field and the opportunity to achieve their dreams, but part of that level of fairness, is that everyone meets the same standards to be considered.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This legislation changed the way of life completely. Author of Fundamentals of Human Resources Management, DeCenzo stated “No single piece of legislation has had a greater effect on reducing employment discrimination than the Civil Rights Act of 1964”. This meant that employers had to make accommodations for everybody to be able to have the same opportunities to work regardless of how they looked like and what their beliefs were. “The act forbade the use of federal funds for any discriminatory program” History Network. Millions of people were affected by this in the past that laws such as this act had to be passed for citizens to start treating other people with equality.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals believe in their own religion, as there are many in the world. It is discrimination if one is not hired because you do not accept their religion. As per my family I come from a Sikh family, where the guys in the family wear a turban as a part of our tradition and religion. Something very similar has occurred to a Roman Catholic woman employed with Manhattan’s frame and watch wholesale store. The employee, Jamie Errico was told not to wear crucifix while she is working, especially since the store is very close Times Square in Manhattan New York.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religious Accommodations

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Your post has some very insightful points that truly sheds light to the importance of religious accommodations in the workplace. Essentially, since employees may experience conflicts between their employment obligations and their religious observations, employers are legally required to reasonably accommodate these religious obligations, unless the accommodation would cause undue hardship for the employer (Ghumman, Ryan, Barclay, & Markel, 2013). Moreover, your post has helped me to really see the importance of how accommodating in regards to religion can be to ensuring that employees are able to fully partake in things such as religious practices that they deem as an important aspect in their personal lives.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accommodating Religious Practices in the Workplace Religion is an increasing component in the workplace. Reasonable accommodation of different religions in the workplace continues to be a problem within organizations. This paper will look at a discrimination case where religion accommodation is present, what laws, doctrines, and customs were related to the decision, and proactive policies to avoid a religious discrimination lawsuit. EEOC V. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. Umme-Hani Khan started working at Hollister (owned by Abercrombie & Fitch) in 2009. At first she was asked to wear hijabs (religious headscarf) in Hollister colors, which she agreed, but in mid-February 2010 Khan was asked to take off her hijab because it violated…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of time, there have been laws to help combat workplace-discrimination; such as race, age, and disability. According to the textbook, one law that combats race discrimination is “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964” (Mathis 90), which prevents discrimination “based on a person’s sex, race, national origin, color, and/or religion” (Mathis 90). Second, a law in place that combats disability discrimination is the “Rehabilitation Act” (Mathis 101), which requires federal contractor’s to “employ workers with disabilities based on steps outlined in the contractor’s AAP” (Mathis 101). Finally, a law put in place to combat age discrimination the “Age Discrimination Act of 1967” (Mathis 107) makes it illegal to discriminate “all individuals age 40 and over…” (Mathis 107).…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religious accessories? Should they be banned? It is a well-known fact that religion and workplaces often produce conflicts and so employers usually want their workplaces to be secular but violation of people’s basic human rights is not acceptable and banning religious accessories is a violation of people’s fundamental human rights. After all we work to live but we do not live to work.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays