James Rachel's Argument On Active Vs. Euthanasia

Improved Essays
In this paper, I will summarize James Rachel’s argument on active versus euthanasia, and explain the examples he has written about to further explain it. After that I will summarize Thomas Sullivan’s objection. And at the end I will state my stance and conclusion on the subject. Rachels argument is on the difference between active and passive euthanasia and if that is really a distinction that needs to be made. He states in his introduction that active euthanasia is never allowed but passive euthanasia is sometimes allowed. Active euthanasia is when the doctor has a specific treatment that bring about the end of a patient’s life, such as a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is when a doctor withholds treatment that would otherwise keep the …show more content…
In the first situation, a man named Smith is in line for a large inheritance, but only if something happens to his six year old cousin. So one night when his cousin is bathing, Smith sneaks in and drowns the child ,and makes it look like an accident. In the second situation, a man named Jones is in the exact situation, and has the same plan. But when he goes into the bathroom, he sees his cousin slip and fall, hitting his head. Jones stands by and watched as the child drowns, but is willing to push his head back under if needed. Clearly Smith’s situation is meant to symbolize active euthanasia, and Jones is meant to symbolize Passive euthanasia. While smith killed the child, and jones just “let” the child die, but both men were working under the same motive of getting their inheritance. If letting die was less bad morally than killing, Jones wouldn 't be as wrong in this situation, yet he is. This proves that the distinction between killing and letting die, isn 't important morally. The AMA is also wrong in the wording of it statement, it condemns “intentionally” ending someone 's life, or mercy killing, but it allows the ending of treatment used to keep the person alive. Rachel says that this is also intentionally killing the person, because when you stop treatment that is the action that is causing the end of the person 's

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The AMA doctrine claims passive euthanasia is more ethically acceptable than active euthanasia. In his first argument, if a patient suffering terrible pain is going to die anyway, it would be unnecessary to prolong his life for a few more days. A few more days will not change the patient’s health status and giving him more medication will only keep him alive for a few more days. In this case, passive euthanasia can be time consuming and unnecessary, causing the patient more suffering. Active euthanasia will have more directive actions and stop the pain instantly.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith “sneaks” into the bathroom while his nephew is in the bathtub; he pushes his nephew’s head under the water, and drowns him. Smith makes this look like an accident and inherits the money. On the other hand Jones also has a similar scenario. He “sneaks” into the bathroom, he sees his nephew slides, hit his head, and he lands face down in the tub. Jones watched this play out and he’s ready to push his nephew 's head under, if he recovers.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy prohibits active euthanasia, but the statement begins to deny that no further treatment is related to the intentional termination of life. Rachels points out the mistake in the statement. He thinks that doctors are only worried about the patient will die soon, or the patient’s life will become a huge burden. Nonetheless, he shows the same viewpoint in these cases that significant difference between killing and letting die hardly exist in the case of euthanasia. No matter what humane reasons that a doctor decides to let a patient die, his decision would be morally reprehensible.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The physician may not see viable life in the patient and may need to empty the bed to make room for new patients. At this point, the physician makes the decision to terminate the patient against their silent will. At this point, who speaks for the patient? It would be easy for someone to view this as murder. Dr. Pollard also states that the views of the ones that are actually effected by euthanasia are not usually the ones that we hear.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There was a question of whether Mills was aware and conscious of the suffering during this time, and evidently, was given a round of unsuccessful pain-killers and anesthetics to prevent the continuation of this apparent suffering. At 2:52 pm, Dr. Morrison entered his room and injected a lethal dose of potassium chloride, instantly killing him. In 1997, Nancy Morrison was charged with first-degree murder, but then was let off and reprimanded instead due to the uncertainty of what truly caused Paul Mills’ death. Ultimately, this case is questioning whether or not Dr. Morrison inherently committed murder through non-voluntary active euthanasia or whether she voluntarily committed active euthanasia. First off, Utilitarian logic is aimed at analyzing the costs and benefits of the action.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rachels goes on to reiterate the statement from the AMA to allude that at a patient 's request, a physician may withhold treatment which would prolong one’s life. However a physician may not take steps to intentionally terminate a patient 's life. Although Rachels says that this doctrine is what is believed to be the…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active euthanasia allows doctors to do this in a humane way. After all passive and active euthanasia has the same outcome in the end, one just allows the patient peace quicker. People are just used to hearing killing is worse than dying because of how the media portrays both: “Most actual cases of killing are clearly terrible On the other hand, one hardly ever hears of a case of letting die, except for the actions of doctors who are motivated by humanitarian reasons. So one learns to think of killing in a much worse light than of letting die” (865). Rachel’s argument is effective because his example is strong and hard to dispute.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a good point he identifies, “ The decision to let a patient die is a subject to moral appraisal in the same way that a decision to kill him would be subject to moral appraisal.” (Rachel, p. 291). Either way the two euthanasia has the same morally outcome. Rachel considers this as an “Faulty Analogy.” Yes they are still a significant moral difference between the two, but that doesn’t mean every instant of active euthanasia is wrong morally.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, I would argue, this is the best way to paint the picture in which a patient is in so much pain that he or she is begging for an end. The author closes this section of the argument by stating, “If a person prefers-and even begs for-death as the only alternative to lingering on in this kind of torment, only to die anyway after a while then surely it is not immoral to help this person die sooner” (Rachels 268). This is an important part of the argument to emphasize because it can also appeal to the people who are against active euthanasia. I say this because most people in society do not appreciate or want immense pain,…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active Euthanasia is intentionally killing someone. Another look at active euthanasia is murder. It is ethically, wrong.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active euthanasia is when direct action is taken, ending the life of the patient. I chose to focus my paper on the article entitled “Voluntary Active Euthanasia” written by Dan W. Brock. In "Voluntary Active Euthanasia", Brock analyzes the arguments for and against the legalization of active euthanasia. From his perspective, an individual’s well-being and control over…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics