Rachels 'An Analysis Of Active And Passive Euthanasia'
Since there isn 't any closing difference, active euthanasia is as morally justified as passive euthanasia.
The argument that Rachel proposed fails to be effective and persuasive. Peter Singer reasons that we have an important obligation to secure and promote the “essentials of human well-being.” This is an aggregable statement, because it is our moral obligation to lend a helping hand to save a life. The life of a human being has a lot of value and significance. We should do everything possible to save a life, even if it involves sacrificing our own lives. This might seem debatable, but honorably it is the correct thing to do. Every life is equally important and we should help save as much lives