Passive Euthanasia Analysis

Superior Essays
In James Rachel’s “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he specifically argues, “that the traditional distinction between killing and letting die is untenable” (Rachels, 1975, p. 678). Rachels believes killing is not any worse than letting someone die. Therefore, passive euthanasia is not better than active euthanasia. For legal reasons, physicians may have to differentiate the difference between passive and active euthanasia, but, “they should not give the distinction any added authority and weight by writing it into official statement of medical ethics,” (Rachels, 1975, p.678). Active euthanasia is defined as killing the person directly. For example, killing someone by directly giving them a fatal amount of medication to cause an overdose. Passive …show more content…
The AMA doctrine claims passive euthanasia is more ethically acceptable than active euthanasia. In his first argument, if a patient suffering terrible pain is going to die anyway, it would be unnecessary to prolong his life for a few more days. A few more days will not change the patient’s health status and giving him more medication will only keep him alive for a few more days. In this case, passive euthanasia can be time consuming and unnecessary, causing the patient more suffering. Active euthanasia will have more directive actions and stop the pain instantly. To choose passive euthanasia means to kill the patient indirectly by causing them to suffer more pain …show more content…
Both cases were set in the same scenario where two men would gain a large inheritance if anything happens to their six-year-old cousin. In Smith’s case, he sneaks into the bathroom and intentionally, “drowns the child, and then arranges things so that it will look like an accident,” (Rachels, 1975, p.680). On the other hand, John intends for drown the child in the bath, but as he enters the bathroom, “Jones sees the child slip and hit his head, and fall face down in the water,” (Rachels, 1975, p.680). The child ends up drowning himself without Jones having to do anything but to watch. Jones does not call for help and allows the kid to continue to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Rachels and Brock” Rachels thesis is active euthanasia is morally permissible under conditions when passive euthanasia is morally permissble and the patient wants active euthanasia. Rachels argue there is not a difference between killing someone or letting one die( Rachels pg 649). Rachels makes reference to patients with terminal illness. Once treatment is no longer allievate pain, the patient and family is requesting help because of the suffering. Rachels introduce another point the Conventional Doctrine makes decisions concerning life or death on irrelevant grounds( Rachels pg. 650).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With passive euthanasia (PE), patients are killed due to natural causes. If patients are hooked up to life sustaining equipment, it is permissible to remove the equipment. This may cause the patients to die, but it is not medically induced; if it wasn’t for the medical attention, they would have already passed away. However, with active euthanasia (AE), physicians end peoples’ lives short before natural causes would otherwise kill them.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia” the author Rachels argues that both passive and active euthanasia are permitted. Active euthanasia is purely known as taking a positive action, which is designed to kill the patient who is incurably ill. Passive euthanasia, on the contrary, means easily holding back from doing anything to keep the patient alive. To further explain what Rachels suggests, he uses two cases as an example. First he gives the scenario of Smith who will inherit a large sum of money if his six year old nephew dies.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article that I am writing about is called “Active and Passive Euthanasia” by James Rachels. The author discusses the distinction between active and passive euthanasia in relation to moral issues. Rachels identifies “conventional doctrine” and that there is an important moral difference between the two that the doctrine allows passive euthanasia but does not allow active euthanasia. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. As a matter of first importance, the claim in many situations active euthanasia is more sympathetic than passive euthanasia.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assisted suicide is a good example of active euthanasia (Leming & Dickinson, 2016, p. 266-270). Many people make a moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia. They think that it is acceptable to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but that it is never acceptable to kill a patient by a deliberate act. Passive euthanasia is supported by people who agree with sanctity of life and quality of life perspectives. The quality of life perspective is when life no longer has quality to it.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1975, published in New England Journal of Medicine, Rachels wrote an essay discussing the ethics and moral permissibility behind euthanasia titled “Active and Passive Euthanasia”. In this essay, Rachel 's begins by giving his own definition of passive euthanasia saying that it is taking the action of ending or withholding the necessary medical actions to keep someone alive who is otherwise going to die without it. Rachel 's continues by saying that active euthanasia is taking direct action to end the life of someone who is going to die regardless of medical treatment. Rachel 's then links these definition to what he believed was the standard view on euthanasia and cites statements endorsed by the American Medical Association (also known as the AMA). Rachel 's interprets the statement by the American Medical Association which was endorsed by the house of delegates in december of 1973 as “accepted by most doctors”.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the intentional termination of a human 's life, at the explicit request of the one who dies, with the aid of a physician. Should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he/ she is incurably ill and in pain? There are many things that go along with assisted suicide more than just why it should or should not be legal. PAS is legal in five U.S. states, California, Vermont, Oregon, Washington, in these states it is mandated by state law but in Montana, it is mandated by court ruling.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral difference between active and passive euthanasia is…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active euthanasia is when direct action is taken, ending the life of the patient. I chose to focus my paper on the article entitled “Voluntary Active Euthanasia” written by Dan W. Brock. In "Voluntary Active Euthanasia", Brock analyzes the arguments for and against the legalization of active euthanasia. From his perspective, an individual’s well-being and control over…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active euthanasia allows doctors to do this in a humane way. After all passive and active euthanasia has the same outcome in the end, one just allows the patient peace quicker. People are just used to hearing killing is worse than dying because of how the media portrays both: “Most actual cases of killing are clearly terrible On the other hand, one hardly ever hears of a case of letting die, except for the actions of doctors who are motivated by humanitarian reasons. So one learns to think of killing in a much worse light than of letting die” (865). Rachel’s argument is effective because his example is strong and hard to dispute.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Active Euthanasia is the other opposite where people tend to argue about, being “wrong” for killing a person. Active Euthanasia, also known as “killing someone” in this case is useful for doctors to do. His claim for both active and passive seem to fall in the same place causing death. People argue the opposite as of how “ The thought is that killing a person is morally worse than letting that person die.” (Rachel, p. 287).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This term is common to the medical profession where doctors kill terminally ill patients when their end is inevitable. Passive euthanasia involves doing nothing to prevent the end of life and letting nature run its course. The major controversy in medicine nowadays is whether or not killing an individual is worse then letting him or her die, since over the years we have considered the medical profession as one that saves lives in any and every situation. However, the defenders of active euthanasia suggest that the medical profession is not just one that saves lives but is also one that eases the pain, even if that involves inducing death. This contradicts the American Medical Association’s (AMA) views on euthanasia.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia has been the topic of debate for years. The issue of surrounded by euthanasia effects ethical and legal that relates to patient and health care professionals (Naga & Mrayyan, 2013). Euthanasia is defined as the active killing of patients by doctor at the request of the patients. There are several types of euthanasia, active and passive, voluntary and involuntary. Active euthanasia refers steps that are taking to cause death; passive euthanasia refers to step that are taking to cause death by withholding treatment.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays