Criticism Of J. S. Mill On Morality

Great Essays
Every person would like to believe that they always act according to morality. The view of utilitarianism is used to show that people focus on the consequences of their actions as opposed to the reasoning for their actions. By following this belief a person can perform a necessarily bad action, but since it has a good consequence then they will be abiding with morality. In accordance with J.S. Mill’s Utilitarianism, humans act morally because they wish to benefit the greater good even over performing an action to benefit themselves. Say there is a group of soldiers who finds a group of twenty protesters. The soldiers tell you, an observer, that you can shoot one protester and if you do not then they will shoot all twenty protesters. According …show more content…
This connects to Glaucon’s challenge because he says that it is better to always be just instead of unjust. If someone was following utilitarianism then there are actions they can commit that are ethical but would be unjust in Glaucon’s eyes. For example, looking at the protester example, Mill believes that killing one protester would be the best option because it has a good consequence. However, according to Glaucon, that person would be committing an unjust action because in the eyes of society murdering an innocent person is a bad action. This would be a criticism of Mill’s argument because it creates a complex for someone trying to follow utilitarianism as well as being a just human being. It would be impossible to fulfill both of the views so one cannot think about being just when acting with utilitarianism. Another criticism of this argument would be that not all people have the same morals. Mill generalizes all morals into one set of morals for everyone, but depending on a person’s background they can follow a different set compared to everyone else. This would make it difficult to decide if an action’s consequence is bad or good because people’s view of bad and good are not congruent with each other. Mill’s argument would work if you do not focus on whether or not the actions are just as well as generalizing concepts so that all people think

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This makes me think of a parent trying to help their kid study. I know whenever my dad would try to help me with homework it would just confuse me further and cause me to be upset. While my dad was tutoring me believing that it was good will, it didn’t have a good outcome. The utilitarian approach also applies to the Trolley problem. Choosing to let one man die over five because you think it’ll cause a happier outcome is technically moral according to Mill.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism as defined by Mill is not clear and cogent. I disagree with his argument because I think it is too broad and too exaggerated. I do not believe that if something creates mass amounts of happiness that it should be done. It is not genuine ethics because it lacks metaphysics. There are many gaps in the principle that are not valid to his argument.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most ethical arguments do offer claims that can be taken as universally valid or true, there are circumstances when individual’s have to adhere to such position and at times turn to developing favorable as well as unfavorable feelings towards such argument. In other words one has to adjust towards the ideals promoted by the argument. When we analyze Arthur Mill’s work he offers an ethical argument as to what an ideal government ought to be and that needs to be taken as a universally accepted truth. In this case, Mill is against the monarchy forms of government. On that, he views them as where one man is viewed as superhuman being who may be having say divine mental power that he will use to govern the entire life of some mentally passive people.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This passage starts with how every moral standard have been asked a multiple of questions regarding to why follow that type of morality and where exactly does the thinking and power to use that morality standard come from? The problem here is that many people don’t see or more understand the theory and objectives of utilitarian morality. People, when given a principle that as Mill says “which custom has not thrown the same halo” will most likely give more attention to the end results rather than the main objective. With utilitarianism, like every other moral standard, it also has sanctions that can affect the decisions made with utilitarian morality. External sanctions can come from peer pressure, the approval of others or the fear of God.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What I expected to say: Discussion questions • In what ways can moral principles don’t have an exceptions? • Does philosophers, such as John Stuart mill, contradict each other? • Will there ever be a time which a Moral principle can be a Factual?…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every day, we as humans, face tasks that we must come to a decision on whether we are going to do what is morally right, or for the better for the greatest amount of people. Utilitarianism is the action that is best, which procures the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers (100). This may be helpful for short term tasks and requirements, but in the long run always choosing the action that benefits everyone would ultimately hold people back. I will discuss both sides to utilitarianism, how it can be beneficially and harmful. In doing so, I will explore John Stuart Mill’s side as he supports utilitarianism, as well as the opposition.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs. Kant Essay

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This would further suggest that when following Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism, right or wrong is more so accidental and depends on the world instead of depending on an individual's awareness of the situation. If the student were to follow Kant’s advice, then they must follow along with their duties as a student while also performing through a maxim which they could will to be universalized. In this case the student must study for…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart Mill is known for being one of the contributors of consequentialism and he introduced utilitarianism as another type of ethics. Many people consider this type of ethics problematic because it is based on a morally right or wrong actions of someone and the way they perform. People who apply this kind of ethics believe that harming others could be morally correct…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill expresses the specifics of his views in his literary work titled Utilitarianism. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism measures the goodness of actions…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the “little work with the name” Utilitarianism arose from unpublished material, the greater part of which he completed in the final years of his marriage to Harriet Taylor, that is, before 1858. For its publication he brought old manuscripts into form and added some new material. The work first appeared in 1861 as a series of three articles for Fraser’s Magazine, a journal that, though directed at an educated audience, was by no means a philosophical organ. Mill planned from the beginning a separate book publication, which came to light in 1863.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regard to ideas about happiness, Mill introduces a concept he came up with which he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. Of his principle, Mill says, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (Utilitarianism, pg. 229). This principle obviously aligns with his utilitarian beliefs because he would suggest using to gauge how people feel about certain actions and if the largest number of people were not happy about these actions then they would have to be undone for not following the premise of utilitarianism. In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would like to believe that all people act according to the same code and reasoning, such as Utilitarianism, but I also have witnessed, on many accounts, the reverse of this theory. There are many who act solely because they wish to promote anarchy, or do so for their own personal enjoyment. This can be exemplified through theft or murder without cause. In these cases the perpetrator would be acting on their own accord and not in compliance with the greatest good, as Mill has laid out with his theory. Many do not have the capability to work for the overall happiness of a group if they are not guaranteed happiness as well.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays