Insanity Defense Research Paper

Decent Essays
The insanity defense has been popularized by television shows and real coverage of trials. Because of this there is a great deal of misinformation about the insanity defense. The insanity defense is a controversial topic partly because of what constitutes an insanity defense. The term insanity is a legal term rather than an actual psychological term or disorder. This paper will discuss some of the history of the insanity defense, notable cases, and finally issues with the insanity defense.
The insanity defense is employed in court by individuals that are or claim to be suffering from a mental disorder. The term is a legal concept that establishes that a person cannot be convicted of a crime if they lacked criminal responsibility by reason

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malingering (Faking) the Insanity Defense The story at the beginning of this paper illustrates this issue well, even though, it is quite uncommon. Studies have shown that about 82% of insanity defendants have been diagnosed with major medical illnesses. So, what about the 18% that were not diagnosed with a mental illness? Could it be that they were faking it the whole time?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court cases that the Insanity Defense and is successful, 90% of the defendants that plead insanity have been previously diagnosed with a mental illness. (Lithwick).The Insanity Defense was first created it was used more as an argument for the defendant to pardon themselves from a sentence. Defendants that are found not fit to stand trial and plead insanity; will then in most cases be committed to a mental institution. The mental institutions that the defendants are sent to after the trials are in some cases worse than prisons. In the mental intuitions there is no allocated time period that the defendant will be in the intuitions, in some cases the offender will be committed for the rest of their lives.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not guilty by reason of insanity(NGRI), means that the person is unaware; incapable of distinguishing right from wrong during the time that the crime is committed. In a case where a person is found not guilty by reason of insanity, the person’s actions are slightly justified. They would receive an acquittal, only if they can win over the court, allowing them to be admitted to a stay, serving their sentence at a mental hospital verses prison. Furthermore, guilty by mental illness(GBMI) still includes the word guilty, this meaning the person will still be found guilty but has had history or diagnosing of a mental illness that would make a person incapable of controlling their actions. Anders Breivik is known to the public eye as a mass murder.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state will imprison but also treat the defendant for their mental illness if they were declared “guilty but mentally ill”. There is an approval of the defense because the mentally ill defendant couldn’t understand that the criminal act they were committing was illegal. When the defendants are declared “not guilty by reason of insanity” then they will go free of prosecution and might be treated for their mental illness. People agree with the Insanity Defense because they think that the “insane” were not in the right mind at the time of the criminal action and could not decipher right from wrong or they didn’t know that their actions were criminal. These people think that the Insanity Defense is fair because, when the defendant is declared mentally insane than they may be incarcerated and treated; which will punish for the criminal act and treat them for their illness or they may only be treated which is believed to show that treatment is the goal and the way that is wanted to use to help the mentally ill instead of punishing them.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How do you feel about a defense that is made basically to allow a criminal justification over a crime they committed? Well thats the insanity defense for you. It has been around for over two-hundred years and since then it has had several reforms brought to it. It was brought around to help the mentally ill, allowing them to plead not guilty to a crime because they lacked the mental capacity to understand right from wrong or appreciate why what they did was wrong. Basically it states they aren’t criminally responsible for their actions; therefore they are sent to mental facilities to help treat their mental illness and not given prison or jail time.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays