Insanity Defense: A Good Or Bad Idea

Decent Essays
To begin, I have a few different opinions on the concept of the insanity defense. I believe the insanity defense is important for defendants that actually have a severe mental illness that can make that person harmful to themselves or others. On the other hand, some people may abuse the concept of insanity defense, in order to get away with the crime they have committed. Thus, the use of insanity defense can be a good or bad idea. First, if the defendant has a mental illness, which affects their actions, then he or she should be receiving treatment. A defendant with a mental illness like this should be receiving treatment, instead of just doing time in prison. This will make it more likely that the defendant learns to cope with their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malingering (Faking) the Insanity Defense The story at the beginning of this paper illustrates this issue well, even though, it is quite uncommon. Studies have shown that about 82% of insanity defendants have been diagnosed with major medical illnesses. So, what about the 18% that were not diagnosed with a mental illness? Could it be that they were faking it the whole time?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Offender Vs Society

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In cases where there is an offender with a mental illness rehabilitation would not do much good. In these situations we would need to focus on the offender and find a punishment that best fits them. This could mean mental institutions where the person could receive help to keep themselves and others safe. Putting someone in who is not mentally stable in a prison to communicate with others could be dangerous for other inmates and…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s not important in the jury room (Grishman 107)”. The insanity plea is used for a wide variety of cases. Part of the outcome is that the accused convicts of the cases believed that they were legally insane while committing the crime. Furthermore, a majority of the insanity pleas is rejected which makes it extremely rare to follow through. Through such cases, the insanity plea is commonly used as an excuse to prevent themselves from going to prison.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recommended Changes Todd R. Clear (2004) expressed that “Good intentions do not matter and may in fact, be a detriment.” (Clear, 2004, p. 70) This can certainly be applied to issues in mental health courts that need to be addressed. Nancy Wolff, Nichole Fabrikant and Steven Belenko (2011) findings that mental health courts are shaped by formal and informal selection criteria is extremely problematic, informal selection criteria clearly suggests that an individual may be turned down in one mental health court and accepted in another which is completely unacceptable. Therefore, I recommend the enforcement of well thought-out formal selection criteria to all current and all upcoming mental health courts.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense has been around for centuries and has always been the center of debate. According to Zachary D. Torry and Stephen B. Billick (2007), a crime must have two key attributes evil intent (mens rea)…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental Illness In Prison

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, mental illness is “an affliction with a mental disease or mental condition which is manifested by a disorder or disturbance in behavior, feeling, thinking, or judgment to such an extent that the person afflicted requires care, treatment and rehabilitation” (Hall, Miraglia, Lee, 2011). This definition of mental illness provides a broad overview of what many individuals in our society are dealing with every day. Although it may be seen as a problem in mainstream society, it is often overlooked in prison. Upwards of 61 percent of prisoners who committed a violent offense suffer from mental illness (CITE).…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The amount of individual that go through the criminal justice system that have a mental illness has become a growing issue in the criminal justice system. Many individual that enter the criminal justice system are bound to end up in prison, where they have little access to mental health help. The amount of individual that enter the criminal justice system that have a serious mental illness is estimated to be 16.9 percent. These individuals are usually repeat offenders that circulate through the system because they do not receive the treatment that they need. (Almquist & Dodd, 2009).…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays