Argumentative Essay On God Is Good

Great Essays
According to our texts, God is not good because God causes suffering without justification and creates humans to be inherently evil. While God’s creations are described as good in the creation story, God is never explicitly described as good. This raises the question of whether God is good or not. Upon observing God’s actions through the texts we have read it becomes hard to see God as good. God creates humans in his image, who are later defined as being inherently evil. God also harshly punishes humans for even minor infractions. Finally, God causes suffering without just cause, or providing a just explanation. When observing all of these actions, it becomes impossible to see God as good based on our texts. The first reason the texts do not support the idea of a good God is that one of his main creations, humans, are described as inherently evil. When God creates the world, he sees that all he has made is good. (Genesis 1:31) God also creates humans, who God creates in his image, who are the only part of God’s creation …show more content…
While in the Garden of Eden, God tells Adam and Eve that they have complete domain over the garden, with the exception that they may not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. (Genesis 2:16-17) When Adam and Eve disobey God and eat from the tree, God punishes them severely, cursing Eve to suffer great pains in childbirth, and cursing Adam to toil over the Earth to feed them. (Genesis 3:16-19) God also banishes Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, saying that they have become more like God himself with this new knowledge. (Genesis 3:22) These punishments are incredibly severe for the mere consumption of a fruit, especially when the two committing the act didn’t have the knowledge of good and evil beforehand to know they were doing something wrong. A good God would not rely on such a harsh punishment for a simple act of naïve

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Winnit wanted to put up a statue to show his religion, but he put it right in front of another religious statue. Official take it down thus making Winnit mad, so he files a lawsuit demanding to put it back up. The District court ruled in favor of the officials saying that it wasn’t a violation of freedom of exercise of religion, and if the troll was kept would act as government speech, which is a violation of the First Amendment. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed with both the District and eventually the Supreme Court. I have a dissenting opinion with the majority with the Supreme Court. Trying to take Winnit’s statue down is a violation of establishment because they are then allowing the other statue to stay up. This shows favoring…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am going to argue that Blackburn is wrong to claim that the existence of evil strongly suggest that there does not exist a god who is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can a good God exist in a world filled with natural evil? That is the question that authors Giberson and Collins attempt to find an answer to in their essay, Insert Title Here. In their essay, the authors argue that God is not responsible for natural evil, since evolution by natural selection is fully capable of producing sinister designs in lifeforms if left to its own devices. Therefore, God’s goodness is left unblemished since he is not directly responsible for natural evil. I believe that such an argument is inconsistent. The authors attempt to defend the integrity of the Bible in the face of the problem of evil, but their argument contradicts the Bible on many occasions.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With all the possibilities rejected, the only reasonable conclusion is that God is unlikely to be all-good (omnibenevolent), all-knowing (omniscient), or all-powerful (omnipotent) because if “evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn’t know when evil exists, or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil.” Therefore, it would be right to conclude that God does not exist because he does not uphold all of the…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others would argue that the existence of ugliness and evil in the world invalidated the argument as an omnibenevolent God would not put these sorts of stimuli in our world if he loved us so much.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What makes the good pure and evil bad? You are just about to find that out. We shall find the basis supporting this argument on the researches of three scholars who conducted an in-depth analysis on the subject. Each of these authors has their different contributions which must be not be ignored, to understand the existence of man in the universe, and things that control him. We shall look at the works of three researchers, who are Bertrand Russell, in his contributions on why I am Not a Christian, Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis, and finally, The Age of A reason.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God. I have to admit, I too have argued both sides of this spectrum. The one thing that both studies can and do agree on, is the acknowledgment that the world is full of evil.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everybody knows that God wanted the earth to be filled with goodness. “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness” (King James Version, Genesis 1:3-4). This proves that he wanted a separation of good and bad. Everyone makes mistakes, and we all know the saying “one bad apple spoils the bunch”. “Now the serpent was more subtil than any other beast of the field which the LORD GOD had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden” (Genesis 3: 3). Meaning Satan was the bad one and gave knowledge of bad to Adam and Eve making them sin without knowing. With the creation of the devil gave everyone the capacity to do…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates, a very important question is brought to light. Socrates asked, “Does God command us to do actions because they are morally right, or are actions morally right because God commands them?” (Shafer-Landau 67) There are numerous ways that philosophers have answered this question. Normally this question is divided into the subjective horn which is the first half of the question and the objective horn the rest of the question. In the subjective horn, goodness is believed to be objective because God can choose a wrong action to be good or bad, a good action to be bad or good. It all depends on his perspective on the matter, it seems as if God is creating morality by the flip of a coin (Shafer-Landau 68). This line of thinking contradicts our motivations to follow the moral laws, no one would follow an arbitrary and imperfect God. This ultimately leads us to believe that God has reasons for making certain actions good or bad, those reasons are what makes those actions good or bad and not God himself (Shafer-Landau 68). In the objective horn, goodness is believed to have existed before God. This contradicts the subjective horn and questions whether we depend on God. I believe that even if goodness was created before God, he is still there to act as our role model and spiritual guide. For instance, when you first hand a car to a teenager, you do not simply give them the keys and pretend like they will know what to do. You have to teach them and show them how to use the car properly. God is our teacher, he teaches us how to use goodness…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Evil and Omnipotence J.L Mackie argues that if there is a God who is all-powerful and all good than he would not have allowed there to be any evil in this world, or if there was any evil to begin with he would have eliminated it, but sense there is evil than God must not exist. If you think about how and what Mackie is arguing then it makes sense, that God must not exist if he would let us be tormented by evil on a daily biases, but this argument is only valid to the people who think God is both omnipotent and wholly good. Which few traditional Theist will say that God is not omnipotent or wholly good, but if you can than the problem of evil will not arise for you.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many opponents of the Divine Command Theory but very few have plausible arguments. Bertrand Russell argues that if piety is because of God’s authorization, then to God “there is no difference between right and wrong” and because of this, Russell says it cannot be said that God is good (Russell 12). He also says that in order to say that God is good, one must agree that morality and immorality have meaning separate from God’s authorization because “God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them” (12). One valid point Russell brings up is that to assume God is good would mean that He is unable to command anything that is evil. This argument allows that God can haphazardly change whether an action is moral or not. However, because of God’s omnipotence and omnibenevolence, He does have the power to acknowledge rape as moral but will not because of his nature of…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God is constantly contradicting himself throughout the Bible on various occasions of murder and slavery. The Old Testament God is very harsh and brutal. While He always justifies his actions, it is a very gray area. Not black or white. How can God have given us morals that he does not follow himself? Why would it be right for him to commit immoral acts and for us not to? This also gives unrighteous justice to people who commit crimes in the name of God.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A second criticism of God is based on natural evil, rather than moral evil. The definition of natural evil here is the existence of natural disasters, disease, and pain throughout the world. People claim that the universe should not contain these natural evils, and that they are indicators that the world is not perfect. Their question is “If God is perfect, why did he not create a perfect world”? Again, this is a valid argument that deserves an appropriate…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many debates on creation and our existence. When did life begin and what started it all? After all, we’re here. We breathe air in. We make decisions that spur action. We love vigorously and can be hurt deeply. Human emotions are part of everyday life and yet we live without regard to how we have these emotions in the first place. An unbiased look at Genesis 1-11 clearly shows the reason why. God is a loving God and He created us for relationship.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays