God Allows Evil Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
I believe that God allows evil to exist for reasons that we do not understand, but I also believe that he was not the one who created it. I believe that God created man, and that man created evil. According to the bible, God The reason as to why God allows evil may never be known, but others have arrived at the conclusion that God must want to teach people a lesson. Another theory is that he literally cannot or will not do anything to stop evil from happening because he gave us free will. Regardless as to why he allows it to happen, the bible states that he will judge Earth’s inhabitants and he will at this time banish evil forever. This day is known as Judgement day in the Christian bible, and the purpose of it is to give humans another chance at eternal life. Adam and Eve lost their right to this when they sinned, and caused the rest of their descendants to sin and eventually die. …show more content…
Their argument is that if God really did exist (and he was a good/omnipotent God), then evil would not exist because he would not allow it to. These people are looking for answers as to why the cruelty and evil from events such the Crusades or the Holocaust were allowed to happen. Their argument comes from a place of compassion and justice for the victims of evil and cruelty (which eventually is all of us). This is a fair question that I believe deserves an answer.
A second criticism of God is based on natural evil, rather than moral evil. The definition of natural evil here is the existence of natural disasters, disease, and pain throughout the world. People claim that the universe should not contain these natural evils, and that they are indicators that the world is not perfect. Their question is “If God is perfect, why did he not create a perfect world”? Again, this is a valid argument that deserves an appropriate

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Hume's Criticism Of The Design Argument
    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hume's Criticism Of The Design Argument

    Furthering on this point, John Stuart Mill criticised every version of the Design Argument by stating that if God had designed the world why is there so much evil and suffering? Surely God would have made a world in which there was only goodness and no pain or suffering ever took place? Mill claims that, because of the Problem of Evil, saying that God designed the world denies the God of classical theism because you are denying that God is omnibenevolent, omniscient or omnipotent and so the entire argument fails as you have defeated your conclusion with your…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem Of Evil Argument Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Problem Of Evil Argument Analysis

    The Problem of Evil argument focuses on the fact the existence of evil in the universe contradicts with God’s existence. I challenge the soundness of the argument, especially two particular premises which deal with omnipotence and omnibenevolence.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    'Roundtable Discussion On The Problem Of Evil'
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Roundtable Discussion On The Problem Of Evil'

    As Professor Margolis explained in a lecture, in most monotheistic religions God is defined as an all-powerful, all-knowing being with perfect morals that loves humankind (Margolis, 2016). In this case, evil is used to describe anything negative in the world; for example, death, sickness, and natural disasters. These definitions create the Problem of Evil – if God is an all-powerful entity that is perfectly moral, then why hasn’t He prevented evil from existing in the world? As you can see, the Problem of Evil appears to present problems for theism. Nevertheless, I will argue why I believe the Problem of Evil does not create a problem for theism based on the suggestion made in the roundtable discussion that not all evils may have the same reason for existing (Newlands 2012, 22:06). It should also be made clear that I will not argue for the existence of God in this paper, but instead argue that the Problem of Evil does not pose an issue for…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Theodicy: The Free Will Defense
    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Theodicy: The Free Will Defense

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God. I have to admit, I too have argued both sides of this spectrum. The one thing that both studies can and do agree on, is the acknowledgment that the world is full of evil.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Examples Of Cynthia Rylant's Response To Genocide
    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Examples Of Cynthia Rylant's Response To Genocide

    First of all, he is the creator of all things that have existed, exist, and will exist at anytime. Building off of that statement, evil exists. Therefore, God is the creator of evil, and by giving us the skills to determine that fact, he is, in a way, taking responsibility for creating not evil straight up, but he created the possibility of evil (“What is the definition of evil?”). God did create evil, because he made us humans, and we have human nature rather than God’s will in mind, which proves to be an evil thing. Even though God did not create evil in and of itself, he just created the possibility of it, he still takes responsibility for it by sending solutions. Sometimes we do not recognize it though. In all instances where events are misinterpreted as genocide, God fully took responsibility for these events. He did that by giving the Canaanites an ultimatum for exactly what would happen when they sinned. When they continued to ignore God, he followed through with exactly what he said he would do, which was killing them off to prevent them from doing something like that ever again. God took responsibility by not sitting back and watching it happen, but taking action. In this day and age, in a way, we should be more like God. When we see bad things happening, instead doing the same thing over and over…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Religious Response Research Paper
    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Religious Response Research Paper

    To think of humans as good to begin with and not evil would be to suggest that God in his creation of humanity never made a mistake in the making but the problem of evil came from us. To take what happened to Adam and Eve and that apple of knowledge of good and evil and expose ourselves into a savage world and make those judgements and choices ourselves and pay for it however we deserve it. Who are we to assume that God in his all powerful notions ever created something in which he would not have complete control…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Problem Of Evil Response Paper
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Problem Of Evil Response Paper

    The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because of the experience itself that .we have been through, meaning that; we can’t have “hot” without “cold” So I understand that what we believe is evil is just the opposite end of the of good. I am often confronted with the argument saying that evil shouldn’t exist if God really existed. The “problem of evil” means that the existence of evil is a needed condition for the existence of certain kinds of good things. There are a number of characteristics that are important only if evil exists in this world. Being compassionate, for instance, is a great value, but can only exist if there is suffering in this world. The trait bravery also is a virtue, but only if we sometimes find ourselves in danger. selflessness is another great trait, but can only exist in this world where selfishness exist, if we humans find ourselves in situations where we need help from others people. God created a way that we would depend upon one another, that we would come together to form a unified community. If each of us were independent, safe from suffering, then the great goods things that come from this would not…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Good God And Evil Essay
    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Good God And Evil Essay

    argue that a perfect creator cannot create imperfect things; this is obviously false if we consider…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil And Omnipotence Summary
    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evil And Omnipotence Summary

    In Evil and Omnipotence J.L Mackie argues that if there is a God who is all-powerful and all good than he would not have allowed there to be any evil in this world, or if there was any evil to begin with he would have eliminated it, but sense there is evil than God must not exist. If you think about how and what Mackie is arguing then it makes sense, that God must not exist if he would let us be tormented by evil on a daily biases, but this argument is only valid to the people who think God is both omnipotent and wholly good. Which few traditional Theist will say that God is not omnipotent or wholly good, but if you can than the problem of evil will not arise for you.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas Archetypes
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aquinas Archetypes

    Many people will ask that if God is so powerful and all knowing then why is there still evil in the world? Evil can come in multiple forms, there is moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is evil acts committed by people against others, like rape and murder. Natural evil is natural disasters such as floods and sickness. The Bible tells us that God loves all his children and yet every day God’s children die before they grow old, suffer from disease, and have heinous crimes committed against them. If God is so powerful why doesn't he stop it? Aquinas was able to answer that question. God cannot stop those evils from happening because he loves us and gave us the gift of free will. God wanted to create something greater so he created our natural world and us as human beings. God wanted to receive our love, but he could not receive true love unless it was given to him willingly by us. The textbook states, “Thomas argued that God willed the creation of a universe in which His love could be multiplied,” (Soccio 8-8a). With free will came free love which humans could give back to God. Aquinas also said, “Though God did not…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    God Does Not Encourage Moral Evil
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    God Does Not Encourage Moral Evil

    An easily noticed problem with this argument is seen in premise 3. The problem is commonly seen as an argument over whether God is justified in creating evil, but instead it is about how God is not allowed to intervene and stop or create evil events. If God is all good then God would be separate from all evil; because God is separate from all evil if God was to intervene in evil events no matter how small this would mean that God is now involved in evil events. Because God is not involved with the events of evil in the world God is allowing evil to happen to shape humans moral urgency. So in the situation of evil events stopping, God would not interfere and create evil events to encourage moral urgency because God is totally separate from all evil.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Richard Swinburne Why God Allows Evil
    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Richard Swinburne Why God Allows Evil

    Richard Swinburne discusses in his article “ Why God Allows Evil” the merits and a need for evil to happen in the world. He explains that there are two types of evil in the world: moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is defined as evil acts that humans deliberately and knowing commit. This is a stark contrast to natural evil in which humans have no control over like disease and natural disasters. Both evils are necessary for humans to have responsibility for one another and free will. If God did not create evil, we would not have true free will. “He would be like a father asking his elder son to look after the younger son, and adding that he would be watching the elder son’s every move and would intervene the moment the elder son did a…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Evil Argument
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evil Argument

    The Problem of Evil argument is an atheological attempt to prove God does not exist in a very definitive format. However, the complexity of not only God, but their choice argument, cannot be developed so decisively because they are lacking an explanation for their standard of “evil” foundation. Thus, they seek to rationalize it with a Christian’s perception of God and question every aspect without fulfilling the burden of defining the standard for which evil is based in their argument.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil
    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil

    The first idea we face, is the logical problem of evil. What this questions is the possibility of there being an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omnipresent God and why evil still exists. One of the arguments made is, there is a God who is omnibenevolent and supposedly all good eliminates evil as far as it can, but we still have evil existing when there’s a God. By stating all of these, we have to give up one of the statements in order to make the argument true. The one fact that we can more than likely give up, is all good eliminates evil as far as it can. The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings