In Re Gault In The Juvenile Justice System

Improved Essays
The case of In re Gault is significant in that it changed how juveniles are viewed and treated in the juvenile justice system. The fact that children were property and had no rights subjected them to sometimes cruel and harsh punishments for extended periods of time. I agree with the court’s decision that this type of justice was not providing any rehabilitation, but rather harsh penalties for what would be considered citational or misdemeanor adult offenses. In re Gault played a major role shifting the way juveniles were considered a moral obligation of the government under the concept of parens patriae to having the right to due process, with the inclusion of due process protections. These protections in the juvenile system includes the right

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault was a landmark juvenile decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that declared a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing to have the right to similar due process rights as afforded to adults (In re Gault, 1967). This was established under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This decision was held because during the initial trial, neither the Ms. Cook, nor any potential witnesses, were present at the hearing to testify against Gault. Yet, Gault was found guilty and his punishment consisted of a six year sentence of confinement to the State Industrial School until his twenty first birthday (In re Gault, 1967). During this time period, the law in Arizona did not allow juveniles to appeal their…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These protections included; to have a judicial hearing, be represented by an attorney during the hearing, access to documents being considered by the juvenile court, and a statement of the reasons in support of the waiver order. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) was the first decision by the U.S. Supreme Court for juvenile delinquency procedures. The ruling extended due process rights to juveniles. Specifically, in the areas of; right to a notice of charges in order to prepare for defense, right to legal counsel even if they cannot afford one, right to hear sworn testimony and to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the right against…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The governor of Connecticut recently proposed raising the age of juvenile jurisdiction to twenty-one as a way of keeping young offenders out of incarceration. In the ensuing debates on whether this is a good idea or not, experts also disputed the appropriate cut off age for juvenile court. Carmen Daugherty, in her article “No One Younger Than 18 Should Be Tried as an Adult,” suggests eighteen as the age limit. She attempts to persuade readers that the practice of trying, sentencing, and incarcerating youth under eighteen in the adult criminal justice system should be terminated as it fails to meet the needs of adolescents. Daugherty appeals to logos to support her claim.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Development of Juvenile Justice is a response to youth who committed crimes is split between two desires, the focus on rehabilitation and intervention and on the other side of the extreme is punishment, the want to care for the public good rather than the delinquent with a more punitive hand. In Rethinking Juvenile Justice, Elizabeth S. Scott and Laurence Steinberg have wrote about this issue. The two authors start at the legal framework for youth justice in the United States and how it developed with foresight and clear evidence. Making policies on moment emotion rather with logic and analyzed information.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Procedural Due Process

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Retrieved from https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-xiv/common-interpretation-due-process-clause-of-the-fourteenth-amendment/clause/12 Cornell Law School. (n.d.). In re Gault. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/387/1 Elrod, P., & Ryder, R. S. (2014). Juvenile justice: a social, historical, and legal perspective (4th ed.).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first nation’s juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois. One of the first judge at the nation’s juvenile court, judge Julian Mack stated the goal for the early juvenile court would be that “The child… be made to know that he is face to face with the power of the state, and more emphatically, be made to feel that he is the object of its care and solicitude,” (Pa, Rt.). Although many people in the United States believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults it is more appropriate to teach juveniles a lesson because no one knows what their instincts are, and it can be a threat to society because they will always have that negative mentality in mind. What solutions are there to these situations, or can there be any resolution…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The juvenile justice system has come a long way from way back in the 1800’s to 2000’s we live in today. The process in which juveniles are convicted and punished has become more refined and set toward more reform than punishment. Did you know that back in the 1800’s and earlier juveniles were held in the same jails as adults were? The earliest start of the separate juvenile justice system can be traced back to the early 1800’s (Taylor, Fritsch and Caeti).…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile law is typically governed by the state and most states set the age for criminal culpability at eighteen (deferring between seventeen and nineteen in some cases) (Walsh, 2016). The founders of the juvenile court saw it as “a system of justice that would protect youth from potential harms of adult court and that seek to not only punish but also to advance the ‘best interests’ of youth.” The juvenile court, unlike adult court, is guided by parens patriae, which is Latin for “state as parent.” The juvenile court is set up to act as the parent and it can punish and dismiss cases how it seems is appropriate, while also seeking to help juveniles in a way that can lead them to live productive lives (Mears, Kuch, Lindsey, Siennick, Pesta, Greenwald & Bloomberg,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal procedure is the process of adjudication in law. Adjudication is the process by which a judge or jury reviews the evidence presented in a case to determine the verdict (Oleson, 2014). There are three types of variation when it comes to adjudication: heavy reliance on professional judges, mixed reliance, and heavy reliance on laypeople (Reichel, 2013). These variations basically summarize how the ultimate case decision is made. Under high reliance on professional judges, the judge is the ultimate decision maker of the case after hearing both sides argue their points.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the summer of 2000, Manny pled guilty to seven counts of assault with a deadly weapon. He now has two adult violent felony convictions. Under California’s “three strikes” law, if Manny commits another felony he could be sentenced to life in prison. Manny says, "It might as well be a done deal. Two strikes…I am only eighteen years old.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Re Gault Case Study

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since the In Re Gault case they notice some changes in the court, the supreme court gave decisions regarding the rights of juveniles, transforming the juvenile court, juveniles have rights there is however some consequences. It requires a more formal court procedure, and there is a shift in emphasis from the best interest of the child to protecting youth from abusers, but the most important thing in the court was that youth have some degree of criminal capability. The court not also have juvenile rights, but also the right to waive their rights under certain conditions. The most important ones are an age of the juveniles, and the understanding that once juveniles waive their rights they face charges but they must understand the seriousness…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Juvenile Court System

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kent vs. The United States determined that all juvenile courts must give every juvenile defendant the same basic due process rights as an adult. Furthermore, the In re Gault case ascertained that adults and juveniles had the same legal rights as the other when it came to what they were allowed to do in court. In addition, the In re Winship case stated that proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required in order to convict a juvenile. All three of these cases are significant in being the framework of the juvenile justice system because they set and stated the standards and protocols of due process and fair treatment in a juvenile…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we want to deter crime, if we want a society with responsible and independent adults, and if we want to teach kids what is behaviors are proper or improper we need to stop coddling them and show them that actions have consequences. The problem with the juvenile courts is that they are more concerned with the age of the offender rather than the actual nature and reasons for the crime that they committed. If we hold back when it comes to punishing juvenile offenders for their crimes then it would only weaken the impact of the lesson that they are supposed to learn. If we hold back then what do the victims receive for compensation for their losses an apology letter? As Stimson and Grossman (2009) have stated in Taking Sides the public is given…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Juvenile Rights Period

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The justices were concerned that juveniles could be remanded to adult court without a fair hearing. The decision granted juveniles the right to a formal hearing, representation at the hearing, and access to the records that would be reviewed by the judge prior to the hearing. The decision also granted juveniles the right to a written justification for the order. In re Gault (1967), the Supreme Court further defined the due process rights guaranteed to juvenile defendants. The Gault decision led to four basic rights.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays