Juvenile Court Research Paper

Superior Essays
The first nation’s juvenile court was established in Cook County, Illinois. One of the first judge at the nation’s juvenile court, judge Julian Mack stated the goal for the early juvenile court would be that “The child… be made to know that he is face to face with the power of the state, and more emphatically, be made to feel that he is the object of its care and solicitude,” (Pa, Rt.). Although many people in the United States believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults it is more appropriate to teach juveniles a lesson because no one knows what their instincts are, and it can be a threat to society because they will always have that negative mentality in mind. What solutions are there to these situations, or can there be any resolution …show more content…
Textual evidence indicates that teens cannot control their anger and it leads them to commit murder, an example can be found in an article published by Daily Mail where a “12-year-old boy murder his six-month-old baby brother by stabbing him 17 times… The mother told police the boy had not been at school that day as she had an argument with him” (Mail Online). The youngster also told police “I was in the room for a couple of minutes, I was among to her my brother by stabbing him 17 times” (Mail Online). From this article, it goes to show that juveniles are well aware of that they are going to do before they commit the crime, and the anger has control over him. This is true because Jennifer Jenkins wrote an article “On Punishment and Teen Killers,” where she stated, “As a high school teacher, I have worked lovingly with teens all my life and I understand how hard it is to accept the reality that a 16 or a 17 yearly is capable of forming such requisite criminal intent” (Jenkins, 4). Clearly, goes to show that these teenagers are a threat to others and there should be serious punishment and not just a fifteen-year sentence in jail. These juveniles should also be appreciative that the United States doesn 't have an insane punishment system, Jenkins also informs us how other nations have horrifying punishment systems for their juveniles who commit heinous crimes, for example, the …show more content…
Others may argue that it’s not right because there are laws that prohibit youngsters to complete certain actions like smoking, drinking, or going to R movies, these actions don’t seem to affect other it might affect them, however, once they commit a horrifying crime they are being tried as adults. In addition, Lundstrom argues that “Today we are witness to criminal defendants facing a life sentence without parole…” (Lundstrom, 10). Lundstrom continues by stating that juveniles cannot shave and still play with toys also they act scenes from their favorite T.V. shows. Further information that researchers have studies on teen brains with technology that maps the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers, has given information that indicate that teenagers are having a massive loss of brain tissue this scientific evidence has also sparked the opponents, and argue that this evidence is why juveniles should not be facing life sentence in prison without parole. Paul Thompson wrote article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” and he provides scientific evidence that judges should see when sentencing juveniles, “A massive loss of brain tissue that occurs in the teenage years, the loss was like a wildfire... Gary Matter, which brain researchers believe supports all our thinking and emotions, is purged at a rate of 1 percent to 2

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should be treated and tried as adults no matter what they…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #2: Summarize at least three landmark cases made by the US Supreme Court and discuss their impact on the Juvenile Justice system. The practices of early America resulted in harsher punishments for juveniles than adults who may have committed the same crime. By the nineteenth century, these practices began to change through campaigns advocating rights for children, as they were becoming aware that children might not be as responsible for their crimes as adults, like previously believed. This eventually led to the nation’s first juvenile court that was established in Cook County, Chicago in 1899. Since then, there have been many court decisions that have assisted with the way the juvenile justice system practices today.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Sentence

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No Child Should Have a Life Sentence in Prison 14-year-old Kenneth Young received four life sentences in prison. He was convinced and forced to participate in assisting a 24-year-old male rob a convenience store. Kenneth was not a primary participant in this doing; he was only the second man and wasn’t in contact with victims or even within the general area of where the money was. He was the one to take care of getting the tape out of the recorder.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason why juveniles should not receive life in prison without parole is the undeveloped thinking process that occurs. This is further explored in the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” by Paul Thompson, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the article, Thompson focuses on the cognitive development of the juvenile brain and compares it with the brain of a full grown adult. He uses an example of a juvenile being tried as an adult for second-degree murder to point out how when questioned, the juvenile was unable to give a reason for his actions. He then reports on findings about the teenage brain that he and his research team had discovered.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since Washington State Juvenile Disposition Guidelines have stated the age range a juvenile could be tried in juvenile court of jurisdiction, it would be easier for the judge to determine if the person should be sentenced in juvenile or adult court jurisdiction. The confusion of the exact age a person is fully mature and should be consider adult makes it hard for judges under blended sentence to determine the appropriate court of jurisdiction for the juvenile. Following a research in psychology and neurology that confirms that young people’s brains are not fully formed until in their mid-20s, some people presumed that juvenile under 21 should not be tried as an adult. Contradictory to what the research have claimed, Catherine Rampwell in her…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Juveniles Be Sentenced to Life Without Parole? When adults commit crimes, they are held accountable; but what if a teenager or child commits the same crime? On June 25, 2012, a controversy heated in the Supreme Court between the majority and 4 judges. The majority of the judges believes that it shouldn’t be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole when they commit a heinous crime such as murder, while the other 4 judges oppose to that, saying it should be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jennifer Bishop Jenkins speaks about how we here in the United States although we do give teenage murderers very big sentences that make them spend the rest of their life in prison we still respect their human rights. We do not imprison children nor torture and hurt the offenders, we simply are not letting their crimes go in vain. The authors purpose is to let us know that all though many people believe that teenagers who commit crimes should have a smaller sentence because of the way and the time it takes for their minds to develop. In fact she even states the following, "If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world. They do not.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recidivism And Crime

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the increasing amount of crime committed by juveniles, officials are trying to develop with ways to prevent such transgressions from occurring, usually when tried as juvenile the punishment is less severe. Some people believe that juveniles should be no less accountable than adults and treating them as such may help deter crime. “Others believe that they do not have an adult’s mental capacity to judge and allowing them to be tried as an adult is an unjust” (Mason, Chapman, Chang & Simons 2003). Such views have led to calls for change in the criminal justice system in order to increase the punishment for certain youth offenders. The subject of whether juveniles should be waived to adult criminal court has researchers divided on whether…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All eyes were glued to the judge as he said the words that would change the juvenile’s life forever. He was being sentenced to life in prison as a part of a crime he committed with his friends. Many young adolescents some as young as 9 , are being forced to go to prison for long periods of time on an almost daily basis. Minor’s should not be allowed to be tried as adults and to be sentenced to life in prison, as an adult environment would be to brutal for them to cope with. In addition, most kids are very susceptible to peer pressure and often act on impulse in large groups.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people argue that juveniles should not be charged as an adult because their mind is not fully developed. According to the University of Rochester Medical Center, “the brain is not fully developed until he or she is twenty five years old or so” (Susan paragraph 2). It is not fair that the age of eighteen to twenty-five is charged as an adult, but the fifteen, sixteen, or seventeen year old is let off easy. They are equal as in their minds which are not fully developed. Since minors are capable of knowing what is right and wrong they can act like an adult and do the time.…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Research has shown that the rational part of the brain doesn’t even develop until around the age of twenty-five, according to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Adults process information with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part that responds to situations with awareness and good judgement. On the other hand, teenagers process information with the amygdala, otherwise known as the emotional part of the brain. This explain why when in a decision-making process that teenagers tend to act on feelings and emotions rather than considering the long-term consequences of their actions. Punishments considered fair for an adult are unreasonable when given to a child who does not even comprehend the consequences for his or her actions (“Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried As…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are people who commit crimes punishable by life sentences, some are old, and some are young, very young. Juveniles over the age of fifteen should be tried as adults in the court of law. Children under the age of sixteen probably had good reason to commit serious crimes, but that doesn’t mean they are innocent, and there may be a good reason why some juveniles may have done what they did. If someone is sixteen or older, and you commit a crime, you are old enough to be held in court, and receive a trial, because they are mature enough to commit it as an act of criminal intentions. History of this case has proven to us that juveniles can be just as dangerous as adults.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hateful crime committed by juveniles should always be punished with a sentence to life in prison. Being a juvenile should not exempt you from receiving a punishment. Even though teens might commit a crime due to an abusive family environment, they must be punished in order to learn that wrong actions will have consequences. It is safe to say that teenagers are capable of committing crimes that any adult would commit. Many argue that a teen’s brain is not fully developed but how come they are able to plan the crime that they want to commit.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays