How Successful Was The Reconstruction Era

Improved Essays
The period of reincorporating Southern states into the Union is known as Reconstruction, as it followed the defeat of Confederate soldiers in the Civil War. Officially it began in 1863 and lasted until 1877. The main aim was to reunite a nation with divided convictions and improve the position of African Americans, post abolition of slavery, economically and socially. It can be argued that Reconstruction failed as the legislation passed was ambiguous and was manipulated to continue disenfranchising African Americans and was hypocritical of its aims. Such as the Black Codes, that promoted legal, political, economic and social unequal treatment of African Americans. Although it acted as a turning point for the status of African Americans, granting …show more content…
The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were verifying the fact that African Americans were deserving of civil rights and that they would be considered in the US constitution. The abolition of slavery in 1865, the granting of all US citizens equal protection under the law in 1868 and the granting all US male citizens the right to vote were all major steps in the right direction to improve the socio-economic position of African Americans in society. As they outlawed discrimination, these laws proved to African Americans that they could do anything and could become an integral part of communities across America. It can be argued that these pieces of legislation set a precedent for later reforms as Congressional Reconstruction led to more radical changes than any other period for at least a century. Nevertheless, there were many faults with how Reconstruction attempted to reunify the former Confederate states into the Union. Militarisation became an indispensable part of how the US government operated – as white violence became an acceptable part of Southern life – more troops were deployed to suppress unrest and lawlessness. In theory, laws that protected individuals’ civil rights were placed to guarantee the fair treatment of African people, but there was no political will to enforce them by a strong …show more content…
Such as the Black Codes, which were highly discriminatory Southern states’ laws to control freed slaves and keep white supremacy in place by restricting their right to work in integrated institutions, by giving states the right to punish vagrants or return them to forced servitude, and possibly the most unfavourable law, allowing those who attacked African Americans to walk free without being convicted or indicted of any crime, Southern governments tacitly condoned violence in fact. These laws were ratified by the sympathetic President Johnson – he was a War Democrat and did not support the concept of Reconstruction, often it is argued that Johnson did nothing for the enhancement of the standard of life for African Americans. However, Reconstruction was significant as it offered freedom for some 4 million slaves even though they were far from equal as they faced hostility from white Americans. Reconstruction was vital to the beginning of the civil rights movement as it allowed some key figures to commence preaching their ideologies which differed, some aimed for segregation while others aimed for integration, some took on more violent and direct methods of oppositions while others used peaceful techniques.
As debated in this essay, Congressional Reconstruction

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln sought to unite the nation once more, upholding the nation and reestablishing the power over the South. Even in the slave letter did he point out that neither side really pursued to free them. The South wanted to keep them as slaves and the North wanted the slaves only for their army. Neither side sought for their independence from enslavement, only the slaves themselves fought for their own liberty and freedom. Even at the end of the war the South did not see the slaves as a free group of people, they resented the Union, the damage they inflicted on their homes and land and they abhorred the new working structure the government created.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before and during the Civil War, the North opposed slavery for multiple different reasons, and as a result of the Civil War, slavery was prohibited across the United States. Because the North established what it was ultimately fighting for, it seems the North won the Civil War. The idea that from the African American perspective the North lost the peace after the Civil War is not true, though. The was little peace between African Americans and white Americans before the Civil War, and the war did not change that. After the war, African Americans were still treated poorly and oppressed by southern whites like they were before the war.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As African Americans were still continuing with no rights, Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president, decided to save them by winning the Civil War and abolishing slavery. Lincoln tried to protect these rights by sending troops into the south to help the slaves with the angry southerners. Reconstruction began as another battle for political and social equality for all races. But as Reconstruction came to the end, many…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government. Andrew Johnson, who was the president after Lincoln’s death, tried to follow Lincoln’s footstep. However, the republican prevented Johnson from doing that.Since those republicans were angered by the destruction that the Civil War caused, the Republicans treated the southern government as criminals. In addition, Johnson was racist and it caused a drift between him and the republicans. Like Lincoln, Johnson was willing to forgive the south, if they promise to support the Union and abolish slavery.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the 1800’s, the US was lit aflame with debate regarding the rights of slaves. Southerners claimed that slaves were property with no rights. Northerners, on the other hand, thought slaves to be people, and thus demanded the South treat their slaves as such. This conflict led the North to pass a series of laws that diminished slavery in the US, ultimately leading the South to secede from the Union. While the North’s antislavery legislation may have hurt the South, the South’s decision to secede was unjustified.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Johnson was a racist, he wasn’t quiet about it by any means and didn’t care who knew. He had previously been a Southerner, so he leaned towards the Confederate side during his time in office. “His vision was of a South in which the old planter elite would share power with their natural allies, the white yeomen, and in which blacks, though nominally free, would be relegated to second-class, peasant status”…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, the period of reconstruction in the south after the civil war ended before completion in the south. The laws such as the civil rights act of 1865 and the new amendments to the constitution were predominantly “nullified” in the south due to the white control of local governments and such laws not being enforced (Doc 6). As a result African American remain inferior to whites in the south because they were not seen as equal in the eyes of the “white” laws. Guarantees of the constitution were not given such as trial by jury creating an unjust treatment of the lives continuously through 1865 and 1905. Secondly, immediately following the emancipation of slavery in the south, local government passed series of Black Codes.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery. The decision had eventually turned against the anti-slavery Northerners. Many people had said that this was one of courts’ worst decisions. This leads to sectionalism between the North and the South because the decision had supported the idea of slavery meaning that it had gone against the Northerners who were…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was because it did not accomplish the goals of Reconstruction because one of the two main goals of Reconstruction was to gain civil rights for freed slaves. Consequently, this proves Reconstruction to be unsuccessful because of attempts at taking away the rights of African Americans, which undermined this larger goal. Through state governments, laws were made which took away the rights that they were trying to be gained by African Americans such as voting, having the ability to choose who they work for, and not being enslaved. The purpose of southern state governments taking away those rights from African Americans was to recreate slavery and recreate a system of white hierarchy which technically had been outlawed. This was all as a result of the state governments having too much power because despite the accomplishments of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, the state governments found ways to take away these rights that were granted in the amendments.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, who would work the plantations if African slaves could become wage earners like many white laborers? Certainly, an egalitarian society was not in the most profitable interests of white slave owners, especially in the eyes of southern commissioners that argued in favor of secession to combat the federalist ploys to end slavery: “The impending imposition of racial equality informed speeches of other commissioners as well, [especially in the case of] Thomas J. Wharton, Mississippi’s attorney general and the state’s commissioner to Tennessee (Dew 56). In this manner, commissioners in the Deep South viewed the northern federalist government as a threat to the southern way of life, which always revolved around the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays