Importance Of Artist Freedom

Superior Essays
Absolute freedom is having no restrictions. It means giving the artist the space and allowance to put up any art piece without having to self-censor or worry about the laws and regulations of the government or the general response of the audience. Another key term in this topic would be the artist herself. The occupation of an artist is to practise or perform any of the creative arts, using the conscious use of skill and creative imagination. Despite how some arguments would stress the importance of artistic freedom, my stand for this argument would be to disagree with the statement, and that artists should not be given absolute freedom.

I disagree with the statement because the moral expectations of the audience still has to be considered.
…show more content…
An artist creates meaningful works, to capture the audience attention or to express the deep and innermost emotions that they feel necessary to bring forward to the public. In art, artists are able to express and explore their ideas. In the Human Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19, it states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression”, and also states that “this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” This can be referred to art and artistic freedom as it can be argued that an artist should be able to explore their ideas and experiment with art regardless of the audience expectations and tolerance level. To a certain extent, artistic freedom is also what exposes the public to new ideas, and new thoughts. It is also a way to bring awareness to certain concepts and ideas, and is also a way to convey information to the public. Without artistic freedom, the artist would not be able to explore these ideas and bring out new ideas and information as they would be so restrained from doing anything that could capture the interests of the public. Instead of censoring the artist’s decisions in creating art works, it is possible to allow the artist to experiment with their own creativity whilst also preventing any controversy or issues with the public. Rather, we could take into consideration of who could feel offended by certain artworks, and prevent them from viewing it. Instead of censoring artistic freedom, censoring the viewership of that particular art piece is an option. Therefore, controlling who can view the art piece instead, allows the the artists to have the freedom and the space they need to create works, and at the same time preventing anybody from feeling offended by any art

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By having absolute freedom, they will be able to do whatever they like, without having to worry about censorship destroying the purpose of their artwork and stopping them from expressing themselves clearly. Although having absolute freedom may mean that some people will get offended due to the different messages the artwork carry, people always still have a choice to look or not to look at a certain artpiece, as each artist will always have his or her own target audience to reach out to. Therefore, artists must be given the absolute freedom in creating their works, and not have authorities that will censor any part of their…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aesthetic Meaning

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is a very powerful conversation in modern discussions of what art is and can be. Bells saw descriptive paintings as something that should not be considered a work of art. He took the approach that art that does not speak to our aesthetic emotion should not be considered art. If the purpose of the art is to present information or give a direction, then it has another function altogether. For a work to be considered art, it must speak to our aesthetic emotions.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Art needed to be decontextualized, along with man. There were many modes of decontextualization used, hiding the Dadaists from any certain time or place. This removal of self would allow for man’s spiritual freedom to be free of any intellectual context. The emphasis in Dadaism and other avant-garde movements is not in the final product, but in the process of the work, according to…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This of course, all comes down to the general question of whether an artist should be given complete freedom when publicly presenting art. I will expand on my stand of how artists must be given absolute artistic freedom due to the various beneficial effects it has - such as, complete…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people use music as a way to provoke certain feelings so they can express their individual personalities into their work. No one should beable to dictate how we feel or how we want to express ourselves. Even if a person is for or against music censorship what gives anyone the right to tell us what we can or cannot…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Art is a way of expression and people should be able to express it in any way, shape or form. It is sad to say that this occurs in the United States even though in our Constitution it states that each citizen has the right to freedom of expression. Artists are holding back on the art because they do not want the negative attention from the media. There still will be a bold artist who will express him or her self…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whenever society gains jurisdiction, they can disclose their opinion of an individual and warn others of the potential danger that they may cause. Mill typically does not encourage coercion, but in this particular situation, he does. The author’s overall argument is complex and he provides an explanation as to why he feels this particular way about how an individual should act and when it is an acceptable time for society to intervene. I agree with the author’s point in this context, but I do not think that society should ever be belittling and scrutinizing where they stoop down to the level of criticizing a certain individual. Each person can create an opinion of their own and society should not encourage demeaning remarks because then they are causing harm just like the individual that is already being punished for their…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In these situations, is important to recognize that it is not the entirety of the opinion that one must pay attention to, but the context in which the opinion is shared. For the benefit of all Mill’s writes, “the liberty of the individual must thus far be limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people. But if he refrains from molesting others in what concerns them,…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society has to learn how to do things on their own without letting other people’s judgement get in the way. We all have different opinions and beliefs, so it shouldn't matter what other people think or say. If people want to show pride because of something they are proud of, they can. The one thing that could tear society apart is our mindset. Some people believe that having pride in their work is showing off, but it is not.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidently, cultural democracy can’t possibly exist if there are restrictions or limitations placed on any kind of expression or any group of people. In a cultural democracy, everyone must have the liberty to express freely without any kind of censorship, and this is the message that Oring achieves through the symbolic content of his exhibition. Thus, by caging in the typewriters, one can argue that Oring ultimately exposes the danger that censorship poses upon this goal for cultural democracy. Also, Lippard believes that cultural democracy is a right, just like political democracy, in which people have the right “to make and to be exposed to the greatest diversity of expression.” Oring’s work attempts to do exactly that: not only does “Writer’s Block” show uniqueness and diversity in its own expression, it also promotes the political and social importance of freedom of expression. When the average person thinks of art, he or she thinks of famous paintings or sculptures like the Mona Lisa and the statue of David, however, Oring strives to convey cultural democracy by abandoning any particular and conventional style, and expressing her overall message through a non-conventional work of art.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays