Juenemann, quoted seven scholars, but included too many “I” statements in the delivery. The author’s theoretical framework was flawed. She used random quotes from different articles to support her purpose for the study. She kept reiterating the need for students to work together and did provide some evidence to support this, as she quoted the scholars. However, it was not relevant to the research questions she was originally studying. The one positive about the information provided was as the article progressed, the beginning of the article started to make for sense. She need to work of the structure of her action research plan, efficiently following the dialectic action research spiral (identify an area of focus, collect data, analyze and interpret data, and then develop an action plan (p.513). Juenemann seemed to conduct the plan first then evaluate later. On the plus side she has now developed her plan and should test the results again, since she has better facilitated approaches to
Juenemann, quoted seven scholars, but included too many “I” statements in the delivery. The author’s theoretical framework was flawed. She used random quotes from different articles to support her purpose for the study. She kept reiterating the need for students to work together and did provide some evidence to support this, as she quoted the scholars. However, it was not relevant to the research questions she was originally studying. The one positive about the information provided was as the article progressed, the beginning of the article started to make for sense. She need to work of the structure of her action research plan, efficiently following the dialectic action research spiral (identify an area of focus, collect data, analyze and interpret data, and then develop an action plan (p.513). Juenemann seemed to conduct the plan first then evaluate later. On the plus side she has now developed her plan and should test the results again, since she has better facilitated approaches to