How management can take advantage of the knowledge they have on different cultures when communicating with employees and stakeholders in being aware of the nature of collectivist countries for instance. Managers being aware of the nature of collectivist countries and their connections to their clan, and family loyalties can assist them in helping them to communicate due to their clan and family connections. For instance, while trying to establish funding to start up another firm division in collectivist country such as African, managers can talk to workers who might be family with the stakeholders funding the venture and would be able to facilitate more funding to start up the affiliate firm. This way of gaining funding is quicker than in
…show more content…
Managers can better communicate with these stakeholders and employees on other workers in this culture on who should they hire, easier in making discussing business decisions that affect the firm due to understanding their culture, and easier in assigning tasks to these workers that does not ruin the workflow of the workplace (Pinillos & Reyes, 2011). Furthermore, managers can utilize employees from the collectivist culture need of concern in driving these employees to constantly improve in their job tasks while they are trying to fulfill their need for belonging in the workplace (Pinillos & Reyes, 2011). Managers understanding the collectivist culture can easily communicate with these workers and stakeholders in regard to compromises and concessions in business and work related issues. Managers also know that immigrant workers from collectivist countries such as China will be easier to communicate with in fulfilling their duties on the job due to the fact that they want to main social harmony and order, and welfare in the workplace. Managers can communicate with stakeholders from collectivist cultures by utilizing fact that they will more likely use a group consensus when making business …show more content…
The advantage of managers understanding the individualist culture such as the American society in communicating with employees and stakeholders is as follows. Managers will be able to communicate effectively with individualist employees and stakeholders in that they speak their minds. This form directness conveys a sense of honesty and trust that forges easier communications (Graham & Lam, 2003; Zhang, Liang, & Sun, 2013). This is also similar involving managerial communication with high (HC) and low context (LC) cultures. A manager communicating to shareholders and employees in connection to HC and LC communication culture is that LC communication cultures which are English speaking like Americans are more direct due to having access to more high tech information than HC cultures. Therefore, LC cultures require less verbal communication which enables a manager to easily use nonverbal communication in an efficient manner such as emails (Usunier & Roulin, 2010; Zahir, Dobing, & Hunter, 2002). However, managers with knowledge of the HC culture know that just sending an email to employees and shareholders is not efficient communication. HC cultures prefer a personalized
Managers can better communicate with these stakeholders and employees on other workers in this culture on who should they hire, easier in making discussing business decisions that affect the firm due to understanding their culture, and easier in assigning tasks to these workers that does not ruin the workflow of the workplace (Pinillos & Reyes, 2011). Furthermore, managers can utilize employees from the collectivist culture need of concern in driving these employees to constantly improve in their job tasks while they are trying to fulfill their need for belonging in the workplace (Pinillos & Reyes, 2011). Managers understanding the collectivist culture can easily communicate with these workers and stakeholders in regard to compromises and concessions in business and work related issues. Managers also know that immigrant workers from collectivist countries such as China will be easier to communicate with in fulfilling their duties on the job due to the fact that they want to main social harmony and order, and welfare in the workplace. Managers can communicate with stakeholders from collectivist cultures by utilizing fact that they will more likely use a group consensus when making business …show more content…
The advantage of managers understanding the individualist culture such as the American society in communicating with employees and stakeholders is as follows. Managers will be able to communicate effectively with individualist employees and stakeholders in that they speak their minds. This form directness conveys a sense of honesty and trust that forges easier communications (Graham & Lam, 2003; Zhang, Liang, & Sun, 2013). This is also similar involving managerial communication with high (HC) and low context (LC) cultures. A manager communicating to shareholders and employees in connection to HC and LC communication culture is that LC communication cultures which are English speaking like Americans are more direct due to having access to more high tech information than HC cultures. Therefore, LC cultures require less verbal communication which enables a manager to easily use nonverbal communication in an efficient manner such as emails (Usunier & Roulin, 2010; Zahir, Dobing, & Hunter, 2002). However, managers with knowledge of the HC culture know that just sending an email to employees and shareholders is not efficient communication. HC cultures prefer a personalized