How Does John Stuart Mill Promote Happiness Right Or Wrong

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill believed that the outcome of an action is what determines if it is right or wrong; if a person’s actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Scalet & Arthur, n.d.). Mill believed that we must strive to promote happiness in general, not valuing our own happiness more than others (Schefczyk, n.d.). Although his theory seems to be for the good of everyone’s happiness, it also seems to imply that as long as the ends justify the means, than the action is right. Mill’s viewpoint reminds me of my son’s basketball team where a father felt that his son was better suited for a certain position which a smaller child had. He convinced the coach to trade positions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness has only existed for “...not yet two centuries…” as illustrated by Thomas Carlyle. Within these two centuries people learned they can be happy here on earth, but many have fallen to a path of unhappiness, trying to chase happiness. John Stuart Mill argues that the only way to achieve happiness is to not pursue happiness at all! A true happiness, analyzed by Mill, can be found in your everyday life without even looking for it. Mill’s statement is legitimate and correct in his fact that people who chase and pursue happiness usually end up falling short and do not obtain happiness.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most societies, such as the American society, people dream to be happy and to have pleasure. John Stuart Mill explained that every person wants pleasure in utility. Utility creates happiness through pleasure is what every person wants. The higher amount of utility a person receives, the more pleasure he or she will get.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to happiness, people think that it should be something to strive for and make it our number one priority. However, Stuart Mill opposes with what everyone considers and he has built his own beliefs on how to achieve happiness. Although, his ideas may not be something we take into consideration right now, we may want to step back and look at how can his tactics can possibly helps us to achieving happiness. In order to achieve happiness, Mill believes that people should lay back on the idea of chasing after this feeling everyone dies to feel and just let it come to you naturally.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill argues that when he is focused on a goal other than his own happiness, such as to other people’s happiness, on improving mankind, on pursuit of art, or other pursuit, then he finds happiness along the way. He feels that enjoyments in life become pleasant when they are enjoyed in passing and not made a principal pursuit. If you have pursuing happiness your main goal, Mill theorizes that your happiness is not achieved, but instead it becomes inadequate. Thus, Mill contends that you should not treat your happiness as your purpose of life. Treat a goal outside of happiness as your purpose of life.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s argument of Utilitarianism is a broad view that explains the base principle for morality is happiness. As stated, “the creed which accepts as the foundation of morals “utility” or “the greatest happiness principle” holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure.” (Mill, 7) Every human works toward achieving happiness and pleasure, while avoiding pain and suffering.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Happiness in John Stuart Mill’s moral theory is the ‘greatest happiness principle’ which he calls utilitarianism. He believes that everyone is capable of happiness. Immanuel Kant moral theory is the one of moral duties, meaning that one’s actions should be from moral alone not for the consequences; like happiness. Kant claims that those who are debt free are the happiest because they are also guilt free. Friedrich Nietzsche moral theory are two; master and slave morality.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, actions are deemed right or wrong based on the balance of pleasing and painful consequences that result. In Mill’s words, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” Mill makes an important distinction between higher intellectual pleasures of the mind, and lower sensual pleasures of the body. Mental pleasures are qualitatively superior to bodily ones, and thus have more importance when assessing the consequences of our…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays