Stuart Mill's Ideas For Achieving Happiness

Improved Essays
When it comes to happiness, people think that it should be something to strive for and make it our number one priority. However, Stuart Mill opposes with what everyone considers and he has built his own beliefs on how to achieve happiness. Although, his ideas may not be something we take into consideration right now, we may want to step back and look at how can his tactics can possibly helps us to achieving happiness. In order to achieve happiness, Mill believes that people should lay back on the idea of chasing after this feeling everyone dies to feel and just let it come to you naturally. By naturally, he means by having a hobby, or spending time with loved ones and through the process of doing these things it can make us happy.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that pleasure is something that can bring good things to people and thereby bringing good things…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, we have to reach that emotional self-fulfillment to be entirely happy. In the end it isn’t material things or pleasure that push us to happiness but ourselves and our fulfillment. In Daniel Haybron’s Happiness and Its Discontents he jumps into the meaning of what happiness…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill—a philosopher whom believed that another name for utility is the greatest form of happiness, a principal lead by the clause “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”. With this, Mill presents the concept of utility as a stem from the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain within basic desires. According to Mill, the more valuable a pleasure becomes, the more of likelihood that an individual will employ higher faculties. Mill often juxtaposes human values of pleasure with that of pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Against this doctrine, however, arises another class of objectors, who say that happiness, in any form, cannot be the rational purpose of human life and action; because, in the first place, it is unattainable: and they contemptuously ask, What right hast thou to be happy?” (EEW p.234) Nevertheless, he was willing to prove them wrong and continued to defend utilitarianism. Mill replies that it is an exaggeration to claim that humans cannot experience happiness. He insists that happiness is possible in those who have experienced a few pains in their life and this could be an attainable life for almost everyone if academic and social reputations change for the better to cultivate the proper values.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These actions of sex, money, or even taking a nice cold dip in a pool on a hot summer day; although would make me feel happy, meet the standard for my physical pleasures, because they make me happy. For at least the moment in which I’m fulfilling these actions, “but such feelings are not the same thing of happiness,” (FE, 24). Instead Mill believed that my pleasures that I endure in life should be attitudinal pleasures, which is “the positive attitude of positive enjoyment,” (FE,24). Mill’s believes that there are two kinds of pleasures that one can…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout, The Search for Marvin Gardens, John McPhee persuades society that chasing fortune does not lead to happiness and the best way to achieve well-being is to be in the middle class. Lifelong happiness is most definitely the main goal in life for each individual on earth. Thanks to our ever increasing advances in technology, anyone can live a long and happy life. Being rich can provide for a fantastic stable environment. However, pursuing fortune your whole life may fill the hole in your wallet, but it will never fill the emptiness in your heart as much as happiness…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stuart Mill Individualism

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When analyzing the role of an individual within society, one must consider whether the individual retains sovereignty and autonomy under the weight of the society 's jurisdiction and power. John Stuart Mill and John Locke developed philosophies concerning the balance between society 's right to govern and regulate its people, and the right of the individual to access and express their human liberties fully. Mill 's philosophy emphasizes the importance of individualism and nonconformity in a society, and advocates that a just government is one that represents the interests of its people. Similarly, Locke 's philosophy also defines an ideal government by its duty to uphold the liberties of its people. Concerning the extent to which each individual…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of Bentham’s quantitative measurement, Mill emphasized the quality of happiness over the quantity. "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays