Research Paper On John Stuart Mill

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill argues that when he is focused on a goal other than his own happiness, such as to other people’s happiness, on improving mankind, on pursuit of art, or other pursuit, then he finds happiness along the way. He feels that enjoyments in life become pleasant when they are enjoyed in passing and not made a principal pursuit. If you have pursuing happiness your main goal, Mill theorizes that your happiness is not achieved, but instead it becomes inadequate. Thus, Mill contends that you should not treat your happiness as your purpose of life. Treat a goal outside of happiness as your purpose of life. Mill argues that if you immerse yourself in this goal, then you will gain happiness as a by-product, without having to think about

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that pleasure is something that can bring good things to people and thereby bringing good things…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    […] People become happy, in other words, when they get what they want. (Smith, E., 2013) For those who eventually “reach” happiness, they end up discovering that happiness is fleeting. Those who have meaning in their life, despite not always being happy necessarily, tend to go through life not feeling as “empty” or…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue: Mill vs Aristotle John Stuart Mill and Aristotle agree men ultimately desire happiness. However, they disagree on what happiness is, and what the virtues and goods which result in happiness are. Mill argues utilitarianism, claiming that each good, or source of pleasure, is desired in and of itself, and all of these goods build up happiness. whereas Aristotle claims that all goods are aimed towards an end, which is happiness. Although Mill has the appeal of pleasure, Aristotle was ahead of the game, and he has a thoroughly formed case for happiness as the highest end which goes deeper than Mill’s views, making his classic form of ethics one worth keeping around.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of Bentham’s quantitative measurement, Mill emphasized the quality of happiness over the quantity. "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, actions are deemed right or wrong based on the balance of pleasing and painful consequences that result. In Mill’s words, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” Mill makes an important distinction between higher intellectual pleasures of the mind, and lower sensual pleasures of the body. Mental pleasures are qualitatively superior to bodily ones, and thus have more importance when assessing the consequences of our…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Mill, happiness is the only thing that is desirable as an end in itself because happiness produces pleasure as well as the release of…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    I think this is a very important topic for people to know about because it brought me so many things like: meaning, clarity, wisdom, and tranquility. In the pursuit of happiness one has to remember that it goes beyond our own pleasures and desires. One has to remember the impacts of our actions on other people’s lives. Author Darrin McMahon in his article “In Pursuit of Unhappiness,” mentions how Mill recovers from a depression by allowing himself to look for happiness in another way. Mill says, “ Those only are happy, who have their minds fixed on some other object other than their own happiness; on the happiness of others; on the improvement of mankind, even on some art or pursuit, followed not as the means, but as itself an ideal end” (McMahon, “In Pursuit of Unhappiness” 784)…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays