Cigarette Smoking Vs Hookah Smoking

Hookah Smoking Vs. Cigarette Smoking
Although the majority of people often think that hookah smoking is less dangerous compared to cigarette smoking, they all tend to have similar negative effects on the body. That is, Hookah smoking delivers nicotine in the same manner as cigarette smoking. Subsequently, hookah smokers are at a high risk of suffering from the same diseases as cigarette smokers such as lung cancer, oral cancer, decreased fertility, stomach cancer, and reduced lung function among others. As such, this paper will summarize and critically analyze different articles regarding the effects of these two kinds of smoking on individual 's life. It will explore researchers view regarding hookah and cigarette smoking on individuals’ health. …show more content…
Even though the majority of smokers and more so college students and youth assert that it is less risky compared to cigarette smoking; this is often not the case. This indicates that such users are not cautious of their health and may be trying to find an excuse for their smoking habit. Subsequently, the article is significant because it warns individuals of the health risks they are likely to face in case they continue with hookah smoking. That is, engaging in the activity does not exempt them from chronic diseases such as lung cancer, stomach cancer, and respiratory illnesses among others. The researchers were particularly right when they mentioned that "hookah smokers may absorb higher concentrations of the same toxins found in cigarette smoke” (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). With no doubt, this insinuates that whatever the victims of hookah smoking tend to think are less dangerous are more dangerous compared to cigarette smoking. Moreover, the article mentions that youths need to be educated on the dangers of hookah smoking in order to evade the harmful effects on their body. On the contrary, the negative issue regarding the article is that it explicates on cancer alone as the major effect of hookah smoking on individuals. Since youths and college students are the major culprits of this action, all consequences including those related to …show more content…
The author specifically points out that “cigarette smoking leads to disease-causing DNA damage that can last more than 30 years after a person quits” (Golgowski). Notably, this depicts that individuals may think that they can only smoke for some time then quit the habit to avoid further detrimental consequences. Nevertheless, this is often not the case because once an individual has smoked a cigarette, there is a high probability that the damage caused will last longer. However, the article also encourages cigarette smokers who might want to quit the habit because the prolonged DNA effect if often discovered in rare cases. As such, individuals may have to bear the effects for only five years before they can completely disappear. Nevertheless, the only disadvantage with the article is that it can discourage smokers from making the bold decision to quit. They will have the belief that there is no need to quit the habit because the effects will still follow them and their generation to