Hobbes Right Of Nature Analysis

Improved Essays
The Right of Nature and the Law of Nature are both similar concepts described in Thomas Hobbes’ work Leviathan. These are both theories that explain what people are or are not allowed to do. The Right of Nature allows people to use their own power no matter what, so long as they deem the reason necessary. This is similar to the concept of the Law of Nature, except that in the Law of Nature they are allowed to do anything so long as it preserves the lives of themselves and others. The Right and Law of Nature, though they may seem to be old concepts, are still very much alive in today’s society (Hobbes, n.d.).
The Right and Law of Nature Throughout History: The Right of Nature: Absolute monarchs throughout history are classic examples as to
…show more content…
There are laws preventing people murdering others in order to gain control, and generally people will be caught for the things they have done wrong. Even though this is the case, the Right of Nature can still be seen anywhere from corporate offices, to inside the government. An example of this would be within the American military system. Americans and many other countries are essentially at war against terrorism and against the islamic extremist group „Islamic State of Iraq and Syria“, or better known as ISIS. To many countries in the world this group is seen as a threat. Executing their natural rights, it is morally acceptable to kill not only the leaders in this group, but normal people as well. They are also people, but since they are members of the opposition, it is seen as being an okay thing. This is what Hobbes talks about in Leviathan (Hobbes, n.d.). The idea that a person, or a government, can use their power as long as they deem it as …show more content…
Not only was Hobbes the person who came up with these concepts, but he was also one of their strongest critics, talking about how corruption would become a possibility were it not for the laws limiting the power that one person was able to have. These extents of these limits and how much they really cover in today’s society is evident and shows just have much more work the world truly does have to reach Hobbes’ idea of The Law of Nature and limit the amount of corruption that the world experiences on a daily

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) What does Meng tzu mean by “a heart sensitive to the suffering of others?” Why does he claim that this defines our humanity, and why does it need to be developed if we are to be ethical or truly humane? What are the other three “seeds” which make up the “sensitive heart,” and how do they become developed? Why is the development of each a necessary part of humaneness?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the sixteenth century there was a rise with Absolutism throughout the European monarch. Absolutism is the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. Two theorist, Thomas Hobbes and Jacques Benigne Bossuet, wrote books and articles to justify the points and needs of an absolute rule, although Absolutism has it benefits it’s not necessarily the best way of ruling one’s country. An example of an unsuccessful absolute ruler was Ivan the Terrible. Even with justification from two theorist Ivan the Terrible was not a good ruler or king.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For a while, the constraints of civilized society keep things peaceful, but soon their system unravels into brutal chaos” (Pojman, 67-68), this is an excerpt that Pojman discussed pertaining to the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. This quote exemplifies Thomas Hobbes idea on the state of nature and how there can be no structure and stability without a governing force. Another philosopher that challenges Hobbes’ ideas is John Locke, who believes humans would be capable of keeping stability and structure without the social contract to the government. I will prove how Hobbes’ idea is significantly better than Locke’s theory by talking about equality, liberty, rights and morality. I completely agree with Thomas Hobbes and how humans would be incapable of governing themselves which is why we need social structure.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘In the social sciences, the most general concept of power links it to the ability to achieve a desired outcome’ (Heywood 2004). Power is a heavily contested concept amongst humans and has always been present within political thought throughout all eras. It is, in most cases, outlined as the capability to impose authority upon both individuals, and the masses within a state or territorial region, in order to control or influence decisions and their effects. This essay will discuss the similarities in the analysis of political power between two key philosophers from the 16th and 17th century who are thought to have founded features of modern-day political science. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes specialised in theorising the idea…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life. ”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of nature is a philosophical device used to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people may have been like prior to societies coming into existence. This foundation of thinking poses many different scenarios and questions about the state of nature. Where some theorists remain optimistic about a state of nature, others argue it would be disastrous and impossible without a government. The way, in which one envisions the society will have drastic consequences for how the state and function is perceived. Two prime examples we can look at today are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One issue with the state of nature was that people were free to do as they pleased, but they were not protected. In this state the righteousness of individuals could not be easily be enforced; there is the possibility that people will try to steal the birthright of others. Some individuals in the state chose not to obey the natural law. Locke writes, “And that all men may be restrained from invading others rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of nature is, in that state, put into every man’s hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree” to express the idea that people had the right to enforce the natural law by punishing individuals who chooses to violate it (9). Therefore, government is needed to enforce justice.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke addresses the state of nature to define political power as he sees it. He defines the state that all men are naturally in as “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature,…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early modern periods when Hobbes lived, claims according to which political power originated from a divine or predetermined condition were accompanied by limitations on political rights of people. Hobbes was original, in that he used his argument in support of such ruling families by urging people that some liberty has to be given up and hence vouching for absolute…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction “Rights are difficult to define because of their foundation in natural law, which is a notoriously ambiguous concept.” The concept of rights from the perspective of natural law theorists, which denotes that the foundation of rights is derived by the virtue of moral principles and human beings reason, is a notoriously ambiguous concept. In other words, human beings, by way of practical reasoning, possess certain moral rights. Therefore, natural law theorists argue that law and morality are co-extensive.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in society the government is supposed to protect everyone’s core values. The rationality behind the concept of destroying someone else’s life because they may eventually take your property does not work with government. The government will intervene after the crime is committed not because one suspects it will eventually happen. If all people in a society, abiding by the natural law can destroy any threat they see to themselves, then a cycle will begin and never end. Each man will continue to destroy someone who they suspect is a threat until the entire society is destroyed except for one man.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays