If the Russians would have conducted their investigation better we might have a better understanding of what happened. The evidence they found was tested, “in October US researchers presented the results of DNA tests on the skull and said it definitely didn't belong to the dictator because it was from a female” (ABC). The problem with the fact that Hitler died in the bunker is simply a hard statement to prove right. The lack of evidence that suggests that he died in the bunker is not enough to say that it is true. Furthermore the evidence that the Russians even brought back and said it was Hitler's remains was not even a man. The skull shows that the investigation has been on the wrong assumption all …show more content…
The amount of pro-Nazi people would have kept Hitler alive and well. In the investigation the researchers found this in Argentina, “We know that there were Nazi sympathisers here … There were Nazi activities at the school” (Finding). Hitler had plenty of supporters in Germany, but he was starting to lose favor among them towards the end of the war. In order for Hitler to escape and live he needed to go to a place that was remote and where he would have supported. At that time Argentine was full of Nazi sympathizers and those who would be willing to help him in his escape plan. Also it would have been remote out in the Jungles where he could have hid. While some may argue that there was no way that Hitler could have escaped from the Bunker. But the problem with that statement is all the different hidden routes that were found and the lack of evidence. The evidence that was found is not enough to say that Hitler died in the bunker. However, there is more evidence that shows that Hitler made his escape to Argentina. Even if there were witness to his death, they would have been Nazis who would have hidden his