Gutierrez Maegee Expedition Analysis

Superior Essays
The Gutierrez Magee Expedition of 1812.

The Gutierrez Magee expedition, left a humongous scar on the state of Texas. Unlike previous wars and fights, the Expedition not only changed Texas, but also many other southwestern states. It also made possible for an expansion to the United States territory, in a magnificent way. This expedition includes a great number of rebels that fought for territories without their country’s say, nonetheless it brought forth the will to fight for independence. “Apart from the political irruption of Americans into the Spanish territories was, to a certain extent, an unconscious manifestation of the spirit of aggression, the spirit of expansion, which has at various times dominated’ the actions of the American people.”
…show more content…
Due to his failure to conquer Spain’s army in Texas, he relinquished his responsibilities to Jose Bernardo Gutierrez so that he can begin a filibustering and stop Spain. With the priest dead and gone “Gutierrez de Lara believed that a remote frontier province named Texas would be the key to Mexico’s independence.” Moreover, he managed to put together a few men to help him with his mission “Shailer enlisted the aid Lt Augustus Magee and helped Gutierrez send propaganda into New Spain. Crossing the Sabine with some 130 men on August 8, 1812, Magee scattered royalist’s frontier detachments and entered Nacogdoches on August 12.” Without the knowledge of Spain entire army in Texas Gutierrez travelled to Louisiana with a note from the president to get in contact with an army general that would assist him to get more followers. With the addition a former U.S soldier, he managed to find more men to help him with the filibustering. As time passed, his organization increased tremendously from around 130 men to about 1400 men. However, his expedition lasted no more than five years. In addition, he made a major effect on Spanish Texas, which resulted into more revolts against the Spanish

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Though Mexican soldiers thought that they had killed all the Texans, one escaped. He fled to the mountains, but was later found and…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He famously composed his “letter to the people of Texas and all Americans in the world” in which he declared “I am determined to sustain myself as long as possible & die like a soldier who never forgets what is due to his own honor & that of his country. VICTORY OR DEATH.” (Petite M.D., 1999). In the mean time, Antonio López de Santa Anna managed to receive several reinforcement and started preparing for a final assault.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early fifteen hundred’s a Spanish expedition was sent on a mission to conquer Mexico, and consisted of approximately a dozen ships. Hernán Cortés was one of the most accomplished of the conquistadors in the sixteenth century, and also known throughout the world as the man who defeated the Aztec Empire. By overthrowing the Aztec Empire and their emperor, Moctezuma, Cortes conquered Mexico. Hernán Cortés was eternally known as a man who was rather bold and valiant in his leadership of his soldiers.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a great many people on the mainland, favorable reliance was a more practical objective. On the Gulf Coast, just Native-American pioneers battled for sovereign freedom. Be that as it may, they, as well, worked through a confounded game plan of interdependencies. By winning the American Revolution, the dissidents propelled their own assortments of autonomy to the detriment of others, principally Native Americans whose progenitors had lived on the land for quite a long time and a large number of oppressed Africans whose work energized another modern economy. In spite of their property being fought by others, the Indians were not welcomed either to the gatherings that prompted the Treaty of Paris authoritatively finishing the war or to join the union of other sovereign states.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp goes beyond the mere description of the historical events that took place during the Texas Revolution. Crisp’s passion to uncover why certain events of the Texas Revolution were remembered in a specific way, propelled him to closely examine and critically analyze the motive behind a number of writers and historians. It was this determination that forced Crisp to take no for an answer and to “attempt to separate Texas myth from Texas history”. What makes Crisp’s book Sleuthing The Alamo so unique, in contrast with most historical books, is that Crisp involves himself in his text in such a way that it becomes very personal to him. Additionally, Crisp doesn’t conceal his own personal biases as…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that both Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” and “Part 1: The World Before 1492: Contact and Exploration - 1491-1607” both explore the same time period, the two works greatly differ in the aspect of the message they convey to the reader. This is seen through observation of the difference between the largely personal level from which Zinn describes the causes and effects of European exploration and the broader and more general view from which “Part 1: The World Before 1492: Contact and Exploration - 1491-1607” details the voyages of Columbus and the results of many other attempts at expansion- as seen in the textbook’s approach to the journals of Columbus. In contrast to the primary efforts of “Part 1: The World Before 1492: Contact and Exploration - 1491-1607” to shadow the inhumane aspect of European voyages in the Americas, Zinn’s text exhibits this nature of overseas exploration with ample detail. This distinction between the works of literature is seen at large with Zinn’s inclusion of a firsthand account by Las Casas of the work required of them “to exasperate, ravage, kill, mangle and destroy” (Zinn 7) the Native Americans.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Jacksonian attack did not come by surprise, nor did it appear as a contradiction that the Texas Protagonists defended both slavery and liberty simultaneously. In elations to the Jacksonian common men mindset, the quintessentially of the American paradox that was identified by Edmund Morgan in his 17th century Historic writings concerning Virginia was welcomed by many who supported the American Revolution. Contemporary US historians have now set the Texas Revolution within an appropriate bilateral context. According to their argument, the lands along the northern frontier were hardly unclaimed; this is because they were part of the sprawling Mexican province of Coahuila y Tejas.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibliography Randolph B. Campbell. Sam Houston and the American Southwest, Third Edition. New York: Pearson, 2006. “Sam Houston and the American Southwest” is a book authored by Campbell Randolph and is a biographical account of the life of Sam Houston, and the important role he played in the development of Southwest (Randolph, 2006). The topic and theme of study for the book is the role and the impact of Sam Houston, who was the President of an independent republic, the governor for two different states, and a US senator for thirteen years.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Diaz writes his lengthy account because he’s tired of everyone else writing about what went down in Mexico and getting it all wrong, and so tries to remedy this by writing his own version. We can see from Diaz’s writing about the starvation of the Natives that he too wishes to gather support for his and his countrymen’s actions in the Siege; just as the Mexicas would benefit from making themselves look like victims in their retelling, so would Diaz benefit from making the cruelty of the Spaniards simply look strategic, as though the measures they took were necessary to provide for their king and country, to assure each soldier’s well-being, and to fulfill the wishes of God. Diaz relates the “decision” of the Spanish to cut off the city’s water supply directly after “Father Diaz [said] mass and [they] had commended [themselves] to God”, setting aside specific space to tell his audience of “the advantage… gained by preventing food and water getting to the enemy”, how the Spaniards “broke the pipes which supplied the city, and the water did not flow into Mexico again”, how they, to “interrupt” outside supplies into the city, “agreed… that two launches patrol the lake by night and destroy all the canoes”, praising this as a “good plan” (pg. 359 & 369). It’s no accident that Diaz and his company first consult with God and then come to the conclusion that their best plan of action is to sever Tenochtitlan’s water and food supply. These events happening so close together in the narrative causes the reader to subconsciously believe that this plan is approved by God himself, and thus that the Spaniards acted righteously in attempting such genocide.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Columbus has always been a controversial topic. Some individuals believe he was a hero and founded the Great America at no one’s expense. On the other hand, some individuals believe that Christopher Columbus was a deleterious, inconsiderate, and clueless explorer. Was Columbus a thief and a murderer and should he have his own holiday, is the topic of theologian Dr. Tink Tinker and BBC producer Mark Freeland’s article, “Thief, Slave Trader, Murderer: Christopher Columbus and Caribbean Population Decline” (Tinker and Freeland, 2008, Pg.25). After deliberation and a close look at sources Tinker and Freeland argue that Columbus was a thief and murderer who should not be honored.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Imperialism Dbq

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An oft-repeated argument in favor of American imperialism was that it was justified because it spread the American ideals of democracy and liberty to people who lived without them. In an 1896 speech before congress, President Grover Cleveland observed that Cuban rebels were encouraged by “the widespread sympathy the people of this country always and instinctively feel for every struggle for better and freer government.” This American affinity for democracy would translate into arguments for American intervention in Cuba. In April, shortly before the formal start of the Spanish-American War, journalist Henry Watterson wrote in an editorial praising the likely war that “liberty and law shall no longer be trampled upon, outraged, and murdered by despotism and autocracy upon our threshold.” The purpose of American intervention was clear: to spread liberty and defeat its tyrannical opponents -- beginning with Spain.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the years there has been much controversy on what events in history have influenced the world the most. Many scholars have agreed that both the Spanish conquest and colonization of Mexico and the Caribbean and the U.S. acquisition of Mexican and Caribbean territories are important turning points in history that have helped shape the social, economic, political and cultural characteristics of different Latin American countries. In order to comprehend the great importance of the Spanish and the American’s invasions, the reader must analyze the readings of Born in Blood & Fire by John Charles Chasteen and Harvest of Empire by Juan Gonzalez. Both of these works are useful in discerning ideas that make the Spanish conquest and colonization and the U.S. acquisition similar and different. The Spanish conquest and colonization of Mexico, the Caribbean, and the U.S. acquisition of territories are similar because both had a racial and hierarchical, political and social system that rose from the transculturation of different races but different because they had different ideas on what Manifest Destiny meant, and they imposed their invasions in different ways.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cowboys and Indians: The United States and the Lasting Legacy of its History of Conquest Ned Blackhawk is a Western Shoshone professor of history and American studies at Yale University. His works have focused primarily on post-Columbian Native American history. Within his work, Blackhawk has argued that ‘the history of conquest has an important though largely ignored legacy in the modern United States’. This essay will be an analytical evaluation of the validity and implications of that argument from a historical perspective. This central argument of this essay is that the legacy of the United States’ history of conquest can be seen on a political, sociological and culture level in the modern United States.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Texas Revolution

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main document behind this occupation was created by Mexican President Anastasio Bustamante. Bustamente created the laws of April 6, 1830. These laws ended immigration to Texas from American settlers, and increased taxes for settlers already residing there. Bustamente also marched troops into Texas, and imposed martial law. After the Mexican military stormed into Texas, a skirmish occurred at the city of Gonzales.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays