Hi Nadja's Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
Hi Nadja,

I think today it's hard to imagine a time when the Executive Branch was second in command to Congress, but based on what we learned in the last section, that seems to be what the framers had intended. Remember how it was still fresh in their minds that they had emerged from under a monarchy and they intended to never experience that again? Also, that many delegates refused to attend the Constitutional Convention? That was because they had no desire for a centralized government, and as representatives of their state they knew that was not what the people wanted either. Most colonists at the time were perfectly content with the idea of state sovereignty. In the last chapter, we saw the video with Professor Freeman where she explains that the Federalists ended up having their way not because they carried out the will of the people, but because delegates from across the Confederacy made the mistake of not showing up to oppose guys like Hamilton and Madison. Remember also what triggered the Revolutionary War, it was not that the colonists wanted to be independent. After all, most colonists were perfectly happy to call themselves loyal British subjects. It was due to the way they were being taxed *without consent* because that was an extremely big deal to them. The British tried to recoup their losses from the French and Indian war by levying taxes against the Colonists such as the one created by the Stamp Act, and that did not go over well at all. Therefore, the framers wrote the Constitution with that in mind. The framers had no intention of conferring the presidential office with an authority to act like a king who could act without the consent of Congress. The expansion of presidential authority began with Jefferson because he acted with a total disregard for the Constitution and against the will of Congress. On one hand, he campaigned for a limited Federal government and a close adherence to the Constitution, but once in office, he decided that a president was entitled to a variety of ‘implied powers’ which he used to completely overstep his bounds. He invoked implied powers for the presidency in order to make the Louisiana Purchase without first gaining the consent of Congress. And, that deal went way beyond anything the framers had envisioned. Then, there was the Embargo Act of 1807, which crippled the U.S. economy and basically set the stage for
…show more content…
Jefferson acted in every way like a monarch, which is what the Constitution was supposed to protect against. He had no authority to withhold those letters from Judge Marshall. I hear people saying ‘we must trust the President!’ But it was never intended for the president to be so powerful or to go unchecked by Congress in the first place. My philosophy is that if you want to be president, then realize that everything relating to government is the business of Congress. I don’t think the country needs a president to act like a parental figure or a monarch. A president needs to share all information with Congress. Put it on the table for all the elected officials. We elected them too, and that was the process agreed to by Jefferson. It was supposed to be job of Congress to oversee his office. Unless we want to just scrap the Constitution, which would actually be fine with me. I would sign up for that in a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1986, Ronald Reagan came to address the Nation, after a tragic event had taken place. There was a crew of seven brave people aboard the Challenger when it took off and exploded in midair. The sudden tragedy was being broadcasted live all over the country when it occurred. Raegan made his speech to reassure the people that lost loved ones and people watching it live, that they would not be forgotten and will be remembered for their bravery and courage. He also strongly states that this is all a part of exploration and discovery.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However there were some things he was opposed to with the formation of the Constitution. One aspect Jefferson strongly disliked was abandoning the idea of rotation in the office especially of the president. Jefferson states “The first magistrate will always be re-elected if the constitution permits it…. He is then an officer for life.” (Pg. 23…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . Here in the states, the topic as of late is the constitution; whether ratification of the document should happen, or whether it should not be ratified. The year is 1788 and the debate about the ratification of the U.S constitution is quite the topic among everyone including everyday citizens, in which everyone has an opinion on the topic, myself included. The U.S has the articles of confederation in place however, state delegates believed that the articles where weak, and something needed to be done to make the government stronger.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist which means that every word in the constitution is to be taken at face value and nothing is to be assumed, or more simply put, if it is not in the constitution than the government cannot do it. He attests this in a letter he sent to a senator in 1820 on the matter of the Missouri compromise. His answer to the question can be summarized by the last sentence of the second paragraph of this letter, "This certainly is the exclusive right of every state, which nothing in the Constitution has taken from them and given to the general government." Although seventeen years prior in the midst of his first term as president of the United States he made the biggest purchase of land in American history the Louisiana purchase. When he knew well that there was nothing in the constitution that gave him the right to buy new territory, explore it, and even go beyond the borders of the land.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1992 Democratic Nation Convention Elizabeth Glaser, someone who was fighting the AIDS virus, audaciously addressed the 1992 Democratic Nation Convention about the spread of the AIDS virus and other sexually transmitted disease along with the inequitable treatment that most Americans were getting. Glaser’s was an active member in the fight against the spread of AIDS. She gave a speech in front of a Democratic Convention and was a founder of an organization to stop the spread of AIDS. Glaser gives her personal life story about her fight with AIDS and the effect it had on her life and her children’s life’s who were also infected in her speech to the Convention. The speech consisted of the lessons she learned with her daughter who had died…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Free Practice Condition holds the privilege of American residents to acknowledge any religious conviction and participate in religious customs. The wording in the free-practice provisions of state constitutions that religious "[o]pinion, articulation of feeling, and practice were all explicitly secured" by the Free Practice Clause.[1] The proviso ensures religious convictions as well as activities made for the benefit of those convictions. All the more vitally, the wording of state constitutions recommend that "free practice imagines religiously constrained exceptions from in any event some by and large appropriate laws."[2 ]…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After Shay’s Rebellion proved that the Articles of Confederation were ineffective and unable to manage the states and it’s people. It was evident that a new form of government needed to be crafted. But what kind of government and how should it operate? These were the types of questions that the Federalists and the Anti-Federalist grappled with and argued over, for many years. The Anti-Federalists and the Federalists both took inspiration from men like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This alters the role of the presidency because the president can only get elected into office for 8 years and after that he can’t be president anymore. The president tries to do as much as he can once he has been elected into office so he can get re-elected…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After seceding from Great Britain the Federalist wanted to remodel their version of Parliament from a more Democratic standpoint. This all had happened during the Revolutionary War. Instead of having a king or queen The Federalist would have kept it so, that there would be a three different branches, but still one main ruler. They have also thought that people are able to govern themselves, this means that civilians were safest in the hands of independent individuals which is an alternative word for the most wealthy. According to Document 5 it states “Federalist also believe that government was safest in the hands of what they’ve called “independent” individuals, which usually meant people of wealth and social standing”.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Guest Speaker Israel Vargas September 23, 2016 Israel Vargas, came to 4th period honors english class and gave a speech to the class of all his life. From how he got to the U.S. and how he now runs a shelter for men,women, and children. Something that Mr.Vargas said during the speech to the class was how he was able to get two associate degrees and a minor while being in prison for 12 years. What I think he is trying to say is that no matter where you stand at you can still be successful in life. If Mr.Vargas was able to get those degrees in prison imagine what us as students that are not in prison can get if we were to try to be successful like Mr.Vargas did.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wollen's Speech Analysis

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Walsh’s Article is more effective than Wollen’s speech because of his tone and emotional connection to the audience. Although seemingly harsh Walsh’s tone allows readers to picture his meaningful examples. Walsh felt the need to find a solution for unhealthy eating habits and mistreatment of the farm animals. He does this by making his point vivid with “packed in so tightly with other swine that their curly tails have been chopped off so they won’t bite one another” (Walsh 469). Walsh uses the story in the beginning of the article to deeply connect with the audience.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Father Douglas Bazi, the priest who was kidnapped and tortured by Al-Qaeda, said being a Christian in Iraq is “impossible.” The Baghdad-based priest spoke at a church in California and shared how Al-Qaeda militants captured him was he was on his way home from church in 2006. Within the nine days that he was held hostage by the terrorists, Father Douglas Bazi’s lost some of his teeth when his captors smashed them with a hammer, was shot in the leg, and sustained a broken nose and back, the Express details. Father Bazi’s speech at Our Lady of Perpetual Help Chaldean Catholic Church in Orangevale comes a few days after he faced the United Nations in New York and spoke about the genocide being committed against Christians in Iraq. The recent visit…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I listened to the audio speech broadcasted for members of the Taliban movement by Amir Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansur Sahib. It is said that the speech was broadcasted this morning, through general radio communication frequency, to all mujahedin fighting against America and its supporters in Afghanistan. I will talk about the importance of the speech later, but first I should say that the new leader 's speech was like the deceased Mullah Sahib speech informal, simple in concept, and genuine. The speech did seem, like other political leaders speeches, filled with rhetoric, formality, and pomposity.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays