Political Party Argument Examples

Improved Essays
Political Party Argument
Much like today, people have struggled over what parties to join; Democratic or Republican, but in 1792 The Democratic-Republican and The Federalist where the two main parties. Each having its respective owner's, Alexander Hamilton runs The Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson runs the Democratic-Republicans. So, for presidency by any means the better choice would be The Federalist Party, because of their great ties with other foreign countries, also there view on how the government should be run, and to prove all of this, what they have done to advance the nation as a whole.
The Federalists wanted a loose interpretation, but as some may argue that having a loose interpretation of the constitution would lead into some possessing people too much power. So, one of the many things Federalists have done to recreate the United States is improve the system of interpreting the constitution to prevent too much power going into one person. With this power the Federalist were able to create policies that help both the poor, middle class, and rich and this
…show more content…
After seceding from Great Britain the Federalist wanted to remodel their version of Parliament from a more Democratic standpoint. This all had happened during the Revolutionary War. Instead of having a king or queen The Federalist would have kept it so, that there would be a three different branches, but still one main ruler. They have also thought that people are able to govern themselves, this means that civilians were safest in the hands of independent individuals which is an alternative word for the most wealthy. According to Document 5 it states “Federalist also believe that government was safest in the hands of what they’ve called “independent” individuals, which usually meant people of wealth and social standing”. These were the beliefs of most

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Anti Federalist were a group of people who feared that the central government would have entirely too much power. They didn't like the fact that there would be a person incharge of nations. They also feared that the congress would misfortune the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The governments had rights that benefited the country and people. The Federalist Papers created a new government and protected against…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    They did so by using the document in order to build a stronger argument against the anti-federalists. They believed that having a strong central government would have a positive outcome on the commercial growth that the new country had in store for itself. While the Anti-federalists viewed the country being made up of mostly farmers, the federalists believe it should be a country filled with large varieties of different groups that had different interests and competing groups. The Federalists did emphasize that none of the groups would over power them all and that each group would represent themselves to what they believed was the best in order to be successful. Many people believe that the Federalists were more concerned with making sure that the economic and social changes were seen and dealt with rather than examining the overall transformation that America would undergo over the next couple of years.…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of Washington’s campaign the United States was fairly new and states for the most part governed themselves. States were governing themselves to exercise their new freedom from the centralized government that they all were use to with Great Britain. There were so many thoughts on how the new world should be constructed that this caused problems such as each state wanting their own to the laws of individual’s rights. The lack of a central set of laws l and the ability to control chaos when rebellions or other disturbances occurred was almost impossible. Individuals came together to try and uphold the new world that they had fought so hard to start, so this party moved forward with their vision for the United States.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist political beliefs were that Union would fail without a strong central government. The Anti Feds political beliefs were that they wanted strong state government (closer to the people). The Feds thought that elites (which were: a part of a group that is superior to the rest in terms of ability) were the most fit to govern and the anti-feds believed that ordinary people should have great input into government. The Democrats on one hand were people who owned properties, and have big jobs in the city. The Republicans on the other hand were small farmers, shopkeepers, laborers (people doing unskilled manual work for wages) and merchants (involved in wholesale trade).…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist Party

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore, Federalists saw the need to unite and strengthen the judicial system under federal jurisdiction (Riker 36). Due to leadership that espoused Federalist ideology, the vital role of the Supreme Court was established. In essence, Federalists helped…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Opposing to determinism comes the idea of indeterminism, which is the complete opposite. Indeterminism is the idea that rejects both hard and regular determinism saying that not every event has its sufficient natural causes. This idea leaves room for free will that some actions are due to choices that living beings make. This would mean that people re responsible for their actions and are left to make their own thoughts and decisions. Physicist, Werner Heisenberg, created the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which refutes Pierre Simon La Place’s idea that if he knew the location and motion of every object in the universe, that he would be able to predict the location and motion of any object in the universe at any time in the future.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays