It is possible that Conrad was trying to critique Marlow’s attitude towards women with the sexism, as he did with his lack of development. Conrad expects the readers to conclude that Marlow is an unreliable narrator, and perhaps he expected the readers to come to the conclusion that Marlow is sexist as well, but that is not likely. It was accepted, even expected, for a man to joke about women being unable to understand the struggles of the world. Women at the time weren’t expected to do a man’s work, or understand a man’s world. Because there was no backlash or counterargument for Marlow’s narration, it causes an aura of subtly around his attitudes. The subtlety of the oppression is what truly illustrates this underlying attitude towards women of the early nineteenth century, at least from the perspective of a white European
It is possible that Conrad was trying to critique Marlow’s attitude towards women with the sexism, as he did with his lack of development. Conrad expects the readers to conclude that Marlow is an unreliable narrator, and perhaps he expected the readers to come to the conclusion that Marlow is sexist as well, but that is not likely. It was accepted, even expected, for a man to joke about women being unable to understand the struggles of the world. Women at the time weren’t expected to do a man’s work, or understand a man’s world. Because there was no backlash or counterargument for Marlow’s narration, it causes an aura of subtly around his attitudes. The subtlety of the oppression is what truly illustrates this underlying attitude towards women of the early nineteenth century, at least from the perspective of a white European