Greek Opposites

Improved Essays
Ancient Greek Conceptions of the One and the Many Life is made up of parts and wholes that equate to one universal equilibrium that is reality. The Presocratics touch upon the concept of a first principle, called the archai, that is the cause of all other things. Among this theory is the idea of opposites and how one thing comes from an opposing force. Heraclitus believes all things are one and that opposites are necessary for harmony. One is defined as a simple unity that is indivisible; whereas, a whole is made up of parts. Heraclitus also believes that things are at war with each other and brought together in their strife and tension. The oneness of all things is composed of opposites in conflict with one another. A prominent theory …show more content…
They believed that the apeiron was not limited to earthly qualities and was infinite. The apeiron was known to be without properties and qualitatively, spatially, and quantitatively indefinite. The archai was known as the underlying cause or origin of all things and is enduring, meaning it always was and always will be. It is described as a constitutive substance that makes up all things and is the origin and final destination from which all things come to be. It is also an animating an divine substance. Among the achai and the apeiron is the idea of opposites. Heraclitus focuses on opposites in his theories about the one and the many. He believes that opposites are necessary for reality to exist as humanity knows it. From all things come their opposites, creating harmony in the world. The tensions between the two things bring them together ultimately creating a whole. An example of this would be the ying and yang symbol. The two opposites come together to create a circle that represents the good and the bad in life resulting in humanity’s reality. Being considered ‘one’ is defined as being a simple unity that is indivisible. If something is ‘whole’, then it is made up of parts. Opposites create a whole, meaning there is more than one part present. For the Presocratics, the one and the many is set of theories reliant on the conflicting nature of opposites and how they result in one harmonic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Rep. IV at 436b-c, Socrates puts forth the the principle of division. This principle provides a means to rationally and plausibly divide the soul into parts. Socrates states that the “same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time” (436b). What this means is that a single body can not have opposite processes that occur simultaneously. For example, Socrates provides the example of someone who is standing still while their hands and head move (436c).…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stoics’ claimed that the natural world exhibits a rational order that can be explained by appeal to existence and operations of power of reason, which they called Logos. Logos is defined as God, or reason, intelligence or mind. They believe that God, along with the soul/mind consists as a separate entity than the physical body. The stoics defined logos as entity in the universe that’s based on just mind and intellect. Stoics believe logo as an intangible object, entity of the universe.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parmenides of Elea came into being during the time of the Pre-Socratics, however he would argue that he never actually came into being. He would also argue that he never perished from being. As Parmenides would have it, he still exists, and he will always exist, for nothing can be created or destroyed, because change is impossible. It seems illogical to conclude that Parmenides from the Pre-Socratics era exists, when we bear witness to birth and death on a regular occurrence. However, Parmenides does not think we are acting from a sound place of judgement.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ argument for the Tripartite soul is as follows; “The same thing cannot do or undergo contraries at the same time, in the same respect, and within the same part.” And “the human psyche undergoes contraries at the same time in the same respect.” Therefore “the human psyche must have different parts.” Socrates claims that the soul has three distinct parts. They are reason, appetite, and spirit.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity. In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Sigmund Freud, the purpose of life is to find happiness and avoid suffering. He claims that civilization is “the achievements and the regulations which distinguish our lives from those of our animal ancestors.” Through his analysis of people, he came to the conclusion that civilization is counter-productive to the ultimate goal of pleasure. We will attempt to determine how Euripides believes civilization relates to individuality through a Freudian analysis of The Bacchae. To do this, we must first analyze the roles of Pentheus and Dionysus given Euripides’ specific characterizations of them.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The Role Of Women In Oedipus Rex By Sophocles

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    “Sophocles; Oedipus the King.’.” The Explicator 55.4 (1997): 187+. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. January 22 2012.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Greeks are, for the most part, appropriately admired. Although ancient Greek civilization has negative qualities, the advancements they contributed should not be disregarded. Many positive aspects of Greek life, including politics, art, rationalism, and scientific thought, continue to resonate throughout modern society. The negative components in Greek society were mainly issues regarding equality. There were great divides between genders and between socioeconomic classes.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heraclitus taught me about the value of understanding and how important it can be. I also have changed my perspective on change and have come to value many things through understanding the nature of change. His idea of opposites being one is a very unorthodox philosophy, but makes a lot of sense. And lastly his thoughts on what happens to the soul after death are refreshingly different. To begin with, his distinction between knowledge and understanding resonates with me.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of Christology in the patristic period of Christianity was formed out of two main arguments, the logos’ relation with God and the logos’ relation with the human Jesus. It was of agreement that Jesus the Christ was on earth and that he was the logos, i.e. “Word of God” or “Son of God”. Two orators in particular drew the proverbial line in the sand between homoousios and homoiousios, of the same and of similar substance as the Father. This division was later coined the Arian Controversy after Arius failed to convince the Council of Nicaea (325 CE) of his position. Arius felt that the logos could not be of the same substance as God, but merely of similar substance.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates begins by dividing up his city into three distinct classes of society. He states that in ideal city consists of producers, auxiliaries, and guardians. The producing class consists of farmers, craftsmen, artisans, and anyone else preforming a trade. The auxiliaries are the warriors of the city, which help keep the city in order. Last, the guardians are the rulers of the city.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    My choice for my second paper was the ecclesiology of Vatican II and the book you assigned me was Rediscovering Vatican II: The Church in the Making by Richard R. Gaillardetz. At the publishing of the book it had been forty years since the close of Vatican II and the publisher thought it would be a great idea to publish books that make the teachings of the sixteen documents more accessible to Catholics. This book focuses on three of the documents, you could say one major, Lumen Gentium, and two minor, Christus Dominus and Orientalium Ecclesiarum, papers. The book is broken down into four distinct chapters with subsections in each chapter. Chapter one is the history behind and the forming of the documents.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays