Grant's War Of Attrition Strategy

Improved Essays
Grant’s war of exhaustion strategy replaced the former war of attrition strategy. He considered exhaustion to be the route to victory. The Union would have to destroy the enemy’s economic resources until they could no longer support their armies. This strategy also included physical and psychological warfare against the civilians to destroy their will to resist surrender. This strategy was mainly aimed at southern civilian and soldier morale. Grant’s strategy included a simultaneous Union advance on five fronts, penetrating the Confederacy as fast as possible. Sherman is considered the best example in implementing Grant’s strategy. He understood Grant’s plan for him to destroy the resources of the enemy, and keep them so busy that they could …show more content…
This win was a result of Sherman taking the city of Atlanta, and also Union victories at Mobile Bay and Shenandoah Valley. These wins helped gain the northern support for backing the war effort, and also won Lincoln’s reelection.
3. The war of exhaustion impacted both the Confederate military and also southern civilians. The Union put fear into the citizens by burning, robbing, and plundering their property. This in turn affected the Confederate military. Soldiers would begin to receive letters from home about how the men were needed. There was an evangelical revival that would encourage the southern men’s spirits, but for the most part the Union’s actions wore down the Confederate man pool and morale. There was a shortage of food, supplies, and a severe economic dislocation present in the South.
4. Caldwell and his brigade faced different challenges and concerns while at Spotsylvania. The weather gave them the biggest problem. The rain they experienced was quite heavy, and it turned the fields softs and muddy, and in some areas the mud became knee-deep. The rain had also filled the trenches with water, and the wounded or dead men would be in the water, their blood turning the water crimson, in no way encouraging the men. The land also gave the men difficulties. Thick growth was everywhere, and the men could not determine where the enemy fire was coming from, or in what force. It caused the men to doubt how far they
…show more content…
Major General Patrick Cleburne and President Jefferson Davis both advocated emancipation. Cleburne’s proposal suggested training the most courageous slaves to fight and then guarantee them freedom. Jefferson Davis proposed that the government purchase forty thousand slaves, and train them to be military laborers with the promise of eventual freedom. Confederate general-in-chief Robert E. Lee and secretary of state Judah P. Benjamin also endorsed emancipation for the slaves and their families. Cleburne advocated emancipation because he saw that slavery was already dying as a casualty of the war. He said that slavery was one of their strengths, but it also became their greatest weakness. Professor Frederick Porcher told Benjamin that if they did not emancipate the slaves, then they would eventually become controlled by them. They felt that if they emancipated the salves, then they could still control the slave’s outcome politically and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The battle brought a morale boost to the North. The Union was so dark and depressed just one week prior to the battle, they went “from the depths of despondency to the height of exultation, from defeat to glorious victory”. (135) The Northern newspapers declared, “GREAT VICTORY”. (135) Confidence was restored in the North and enthusiasm to the troops.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Union Army’s goal was to defeat the Confederates and remove them from Tennessee. The Confederate’s goal was to maintain ground in Tennessee after recent losses in Kentucky. The battle…

    • 2331 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebuttal: If Grant had not captured Vicksburg, situated on the banks of the Mississippi river, which gave Union forces complete control of the Mississippi river, the Confederacy would have been able to use the Mississippi river to transport supplies, would not have split the South into two and stopped Southerners from getting much needed supplies coming in from the west. “A Yankee captain wrote home to his wife “The backbone of the Rebellion is this day broken. The Confederacy is divided…Vicksburg is ours. The Mississippi River is opened, and Gen. Grant is to be our next President.” (P. 407 Roark)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sick From Freedom Summary

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Review of Sick From Freedom Jim Downs, notable historian who researches the civil war and reconstruction’s effect on slaves is the author of the fascinating book Sick From Freedom. The Civil War is infamous for how disease claimed lives of more soldiers than military combat. In his book Downs exemplifies that disease and sickness actually had a more devastating effect on emancipated slaves than on soldiers. Downs encourages readers to look beyond military casualties and consider the public health crisis that faced emancipated slaves in the years following the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. Estimates show that at least a fourth of the four million former slaves got sick or died between 1863 and 1870, including at least 60,000 who perished in a smallpox epidemic that began in Washington and Spread throughout the south.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    General Sherman moved into the South. He then led his Army of Tennessee and led them on a march to Atlanta, then through Georgia, and then up the East Coast. General Sherman brought the South down by ordering large-scale destruction. The importance of General Sherman's March to the Sea was to first destroy the South’s agreement and ability to continue the war, capture a sea port, and finally to act like allies with General Grant. The reason to act like him and Grant were allies is so he could trap one of the strong Confederate Armies.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did the Confederate States of America lose the Civil War? Though a stimulating question that deserves contemporary debate, many historians claim the reason the Confederacy lost the war is based on southern resources, military strategy, civilian leadership or the institution of slavery. However, while all explanations can be classified as valid reasons as to why the Union won and the Confederacy lost, the case can be made that all four reasons were significant causes to the final result of the American Civil War. To start, the resources used by the Confederacy can be, more or less, attributed to the presence of slavery. At the beginning of the war, one third of the Confederate population consisted of slaves (Barney 148), and it can be…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harry Williams, it was the influence of the Jominian tactics of concentration, strategy, and motivation that led to the Union’s victory. Jomini was a Swiss general whose military ideals were greatly studied by American Civil War generals at military academies. Union generals applied these tactics to their warfare which led to their ultimate victory whilst the Confederate generals ended up primarily applying the tactic of offense from Jomini’s ideals to their warfare which is why the Union was never defeated, only stifled only to attack again with more zeal. The South’s poverty of resources forced “Southern generals to think in aggressive terms” because they had to act with what was provided around them.(Donald 50) While this is all relevant, it is not that Union generals developed Jominian ideals more suitable for winning the war. Robert E. Lee also incorporated Jominian tactics into his leadership, however, it is Jefferson Davis that suppressed this.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman Dbq Essay

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    General William T Sherman was an American General and served in the Civil War from 1861 to 1865. He was understood to be a “ “war hero”, but some people understand him as a “war criminal”. But was he? From my understanding he was really just doing what he felt was right.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction The American civil started purely as a military effort with limited political objectives especially for the white community. By early 1861 white citizen’s main aim of the fight was to preserve the union and as well maintain a democratic republic. The north fought for reunification whereas the south fought for independence during the initial stages of the civil war. However, the war changed between 1862 and 1863 as a result of emancipation.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recurring theme that is explored throughout the topic of the politics of emancipation is politics and power. In this topic, the path to the complete emancipation of slaves in America is explored, as well as the changes in Republican ideology that led to emancipation becoming a fundamental part of the war. A division had formed in the Republican party over the process of abolishing slavery. Republicans who held a more radical perspective such as Senator Charles Sumner on emancipation, believed that the war should be used to achieve the abolition of slavery, while the group of conservative group of Republicans favored emancipation as the result of a gradual process that was less destructive. Lincoln himself hesitated at the possibility of a…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was a devastating war that wiped out much of America’s population. The book written by James M. McPherson, What They Fought For 1861-1865, describes the views of the soldiers that fought in the war. McPherson uses letters left behind written by different civil war soldiers to portray a more round view of actions that took place on the battlegrounds. McPherson’s thesis does not present from both sides of the war what the soldiers, volunteers and enlisted men, of the Civil War had to faced, how they dealt with their emotions and experiences, the bond made between comrades, and how it affect their overall psychological, physical, and mental well-being of each combatant. This book contains diary entries from Union soldiers that were from the northern states.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The twin Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg both took places on anniversaries celebrated by both the North and South, which caused many people to view it at God’s displeasure with the South. The Northern home front’s morale was also boosted though, in which they considered both campaigns a victory. Also, people would later look back and view the Gettysburg as a decisive turning point in the war, and also as the beginning of the end of the Confederacy. 2. The Conscription Act made a majority of the northerners furious, mainly because of the commutation fee of three hundred dollars to buy their way out of service.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1863, Grant (the Union general at that time) set up artillery to siege Vicksburg, a city on the Mississippi River. This prevented people from crossing or even coming close to the river and land. At that point, the Confederates were running low on supplies and they felt as if starvation was killing them. The Confederate soldiers couldn 't take the starvation anymore and petitioned to ask General Grant about terms for surrender. The defeat at Vicksburg meant a lot for the Union.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the weeks leading up to Lee’s surrender General Grant wrote this in a letter; “I am anxious to have Lee hold on where he is a short time longer so that I can get him in a position where he must lose a great portion of his army. The rebellion has lost its vitality and if I am not much mistaken there will be no rebel army of any great dimensions in a few weeks hence.” (6) In writing this letter General Grant shows that he was confident in his abilities and that he was sure that he was close to winning the War. Grant knew that Lee and the Confederates could not hold out much longer and would be forced to surrender, proving that Grant had taken the right course of action as a…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays