The book is really two stories in one - the actual mystery and police procedural, and then the unfolding of Michael's trauma from a fiery incident in the book's prologue (thus the title, burning man). Throughout the book, Michael suffers post-traumatic disorder nightmares involving fire. And each time, he wakes to his dog licking him and whimpering. In part because of this - and in part because of other factors I won't go into so I can avoid spoilers - his personal life is in disarray. Thus, part of the book is …show more content…
At about three-fourths of the way through the book, you will undoubtedly be tempted to skip the "personal life interlude" chapter so you can proceed with trying to figure out the mystery. I understand the need to have the personal life of the detective present. Henning Mankell or Jo Nesbo show how good writers slip personal life points and sub-plots into police procedurals and mysteries so they don't jump out at you ala Monty Python's "And now for something completely different...." Thus my comment about the slightly uneven plot