Food In What You Eat Is Your Business And Mary Maxfield

Improved Essays
Jonathan Safran Foer in “Against Meat”, Radley Balko in “What You Eat Is Your Business” and Mary Maxfield in “Food as Thought” all choose to write about Food and the social and moral impact it has.
Balko and Maxfield both seem to dislike the fact that food has become a social issue. While Balko focuses more on criticizing the interference of government with their actions and strategies, Maxfield choose to comment on the writers contributing to nutrition and food science. Balko uses heavy sarcasm about how the government is initiating several anti-obesity measures and trying to control our eating habits and behavior. He present forward examples of politicians and senators who are taking measures like investing millions of dollars on anti-obesity
…show more content…
The writer points out about how this change in private health will just increase chances of more involvement of federal restrictions on the consumer’s liberties and our freedom to choose. This is so because a society where people are held responsible for the action of each other will more likely accept other restrictions put on them. Balko then proceeds to criticize how a lot of nutritionists and organizations encourages people that their condition is not their responsibility and “we’ve got to move beyond ‘personal responsibility.’”(468). The writer thinks that it’s not appropriate to count obesity as a “public health” issue and it is a personal matter and decision of what we choose to eat. Similarly, Maxfield too dislike the involvement of critics and writers in trying to control our eating choices. Maxfield begins by presenting the views of journalist Michael Pollan who thinks that Americans are “a notably unhealthy population preoccupied with ….the idea of eating healthy” (9). He is assured that our views on healthy eating are influenced by corporate machines who are benefiting from our confusion over food choices. Maxfield points out how even …show more content…
He shares his struggle with vegetarianism and how in his earlier times, he couldn’t really stick with it for a long period of time. But somewhere in his conscience he always knew that eating non-vegetarian food is the “wrong” thing to do. Foer backs up his claim with some data and statistics. He mentions a U.N. report which states that animal agriculture has become the leading cause of global warming and threatens to be the most serious environmental problem. The writer claims that “Eating Factory farmed animals….is almost certainly the single worst thing that humans do to the environment” (citation). Foer points out the difference between the treatment of dog or cat compared with a factory-farmed animal. He claims that even as a vegetarian he has unlimited choice and he is probably much healthier with them. Foer acknowledges that unlike other vegetarians he wouldn’t claim that his diet is better than a non-vegetarian diet but his morals weigh heavier than his love for meat on his decision making about food. The writer uses some strong language to influence people to think hard about the ethical aspect associated with food. He boldly asks “Why doesn’t a horny person have as strong a claim to raping an animal as a hungry one does to confining, killing and eating it?” (citation) In contrast, Maxfield criticizes how the society view is distorted in terms of how they resist all the scientific findings

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They’re food of course! Vegetarianism and veganism are wrong because meat is necessary for a human’s diet, it is costly and unethical to distribute vegetarian meals, and animals are on the earth for the benefit of humans and it is more than okay to eat them. Although vegetarian diets seem to be an enlightened idea to help the planet and ease suffering worldwide, this just isn’t true. The side effects of this decision outway and counteract the very issues that they try to solve as well as cause a multitude of other problems. A well known medical journal, WebMD, proves that purely vegetarian diets are harmful to all human bodies.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "(Zinczenkonov, 2) Zinczenkonov thinks the government should require fast food restaurants to put the nutritional information on their products. Balko argues that we should make healthy choices and the government should not be babysitting us. He also argues that government interventions will hurt those who are living a healthy lifestyle. "Our lawmakers enacted a huge entitlement that requires some people to pay for other people's medicine. "(Balko, 1) We end up paying the health care costs for people who are sick as a result of their obesity.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Vegan Diets Pros And Cons

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thus veganism is a stand against animal cruelty and seeks to reduce such cruel practices by halting their consumption of animal products. Moreover vegans insist that eating meat is unhealthy, as several health issues have been related to meat consumption. The Vegan Society (n.d.) argues that health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases diabetes and cancer have been associated with the consumption of meats and that switching to veganism would help mitigate such diseases. Additionally Greger (2014) explains that meat proteins can cause autoimmune diseases, as it can irritate the immune system, which might lead to the development of auto immune diseases as the body get increasingly exposed to animal meat. Thus it is clear why vegans believe that eating meat in unhealthy.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What makes processing so dangerous is the plethora of chemicals and additives that are unnaturally being put into our meals. Many chemicals used to preserve food allow companies to export more of their products without them spoiling. Preservatives and many processing methods are harmful to the human body, which is why I believe Pollan wants to avoid them entirely. The "Not…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my experience, when the tax of the items I usually buy is higher, I would definitely switch to something cheaper. The lesson I have learned is that poor people will always switch up to other things if the items they usually buy has a higher tax percentage. In “What You Eat Is Your Business,” Radley Balko argues that putting taxes on foods to decrease the obesity is wrong, and instead, the government should “foster a sense of responsibility in and ownership of our own health” (1). In other words, rather than imposing taxes on foods and soda, Balko suggests that the government should lead the consumers to the right path by educating what is good them. To response to Balko, in “Ounces of Prevention...,” the authors argue that higher tax percentage will reduce the sugared-beverage consumption, which is the largest risk for obesity and diabetes (Brownell and Frieden 1).…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our cultural context, countless Americans live an unhealthy lifestyle, and the food choices we make are often based on a lack of information. The topic I have chosen asks whether or not, becoming a vegetarian is worthy of consideration. The position that I will adopt will argue in favor of becoming a vegetarian, or possibly a semi-vegetarian. My current working thesis for my persuasive essay is Americans should consider how eliminating, or drastically reducing meat consumption in their diets will bring about positive change in this country (main point) by improving overall health, transforming us into citizens who make choices that are informed and responsible, and compelling the food industry to meet American demands. My current working thesis has evolved this week as I have researched the subject of vegetarianism.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example of how American society is being maladaptive is the lack of nutrition we are feeding our bodies, for example GMO’s or other ingredients that kill our brain cells. We have the knowledge to be able to change our society to become healthier, however, Americans are indulging themselves in food knowing the possible outcome. Most of society has a negative reaction on this subject, whereas a positive or adaptive reaction would mean most of society would change the way they treat their bodies in a negative, unhealthy way. 9) Cultural relativism is a belief that cultures cannot be superior than one another. For example, religion or political beliefs of an individual are in terms to their society.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Writing on the modifications of foods in production, Berry paints a picture of the lazy and passive American consumer, who at dinner, “confronts a platter covered with inert, anonymous substances that have been processed, dyed, breaded, sauced, gravied, ground, pulped, strained, blended, prettified, and sanitized beyond resemblance to any part of any creature that lived”. Companies go to extremes to alter the appearance and taste of their produce to appeal to the urban eater. But their goal isn’t to create beneficial and healthy foods, but to make profit from the hazardous products they claim as wholesome. Thus, these adjusted foods are no longer agricultural products, but industrial products, and American consumers, who do not relate agriculture to food, become the largest promoters for processed…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believe that the government should step into our lives and basically dictated us when to eat, how much, and how often should we eat it. On the other hand, the article of Obesity: Who is Responsible for Our Weight? (pg.561) by Radley Balko argues that “Worse, socialized health care makes us troublingly tolerant of government trespasses on our personal freedom” (pg. 562). Balko argues for less government intervention.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obesity Prevention Essay

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But the big problems with people who eat junk food is that these people cannot control how much they eat this food, for example if you ask yourself how many calories you get when you eat versus how many calories you burn after you eat. The people who have bad eating habits are often idle people who choose for the easier and faster, so it is best to create strict Laws to High Taxes on Junk Food to stop and accustom people to cook healthy food and processed at home to prevent major diseases. Taxing junk food may help to improve health, reduce obesity and prevent major diseases. Should be put on the table the idea of raising taxes on junk food, in order to encourage healthier eating in people and to decrease the alarming obesity rates in our country and the consequent costs that this and other diseases resulting from poor nutrition pose to public health. As indicated in the article “Junk Food Tax Could Improve Health” in A.B.C news by Kristina Fiore “Policies aimed at altering the price of soda or ... pizza may be effective mechanisms to steer U.S. adults toward a more healthful diet and help reduce long-term…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics