Register to read the introduction…
Therefore, in this case study, the author used the plant level panel to assess improvement in productivity and use UK manufacturing plans between 1973 and 1992 as the case study to evaluate and analyses may work only on this case but not with others LDC such as China, Indonesia or India. As Blonigen and Wang (2005) said, “Pooling data from DCs and LDCs might disguise the true effects of inward FDI in these two groups of countries”.
From Miao Wang’s research (2010), LDCs might lack of domestic investment’s adequate level in comparing with DCs. Without FDI, the local firm in DLCs will also make …show more content…
Using other period of time may get various results as well.
During the time researching, I found out that most of the case studies are using developed countries, such as United Kingdom and United States; it clearly shows that firms and countries within countries may be different in their ability benefiting from foreign-owned firms and the advanced technology and foreign owned firms.
I totally agree with what E. Lipsey R. E and Sjoholm F, (2004) concluded that if the differences between industry and country are so important which may affect the inward FDI on local countries, that means the search for universal relationships is useless and should back to the focus more on the type of industries and host countries. Identifying the characteristics of industries, courtiers or more specific examining the firms are essential valuables with the flexibility regarding the technology transfer types and timing, especially focus on the economic changes in unsuccessful and successful
From Miao Wang’s research (2010), LDCs might lack of domestic investment’s adequate level in comparing with DCs. Without FDI, the local firm in DLCs will also make …show more content…
Using other period of time may get various results as well.
During the time researching, I found out that most of the case studies are using developed countries, such as United Kingdom and United States; it clearly shows that firms and countries within countries may be different in their ability benefiting from foreign-owned firms and the advanced technology and foreign owned firms.
I totally agree with what E. Lipsey R. E and Sjoholm F, (2004) concluded that if the differences between industry and country are so important which may affect the inward FDI on local countries, that means the search for universal relationships is useless and should back to the focus more on the type of industries and host countries. Identifying the characteristics of industries, courtiers or more specific examining the firms are essential valuables with the flexibility regarding the technology transfer types and timing, especially focus on the economic changes in unsuccessful and successful