Essay On Eyewitness Testimonies

Superior Essays
Memory is a cognitive process whose reliability is often questioned, especially in its importance in eyewitness testimonies. Eyewitness testimonies refers to an account given by people who have witnessed a specific event. Eyewitness testimonies are also one of the major areas of research for cognitive psychology and memory. Eyewitness testimonies are vital factors used, in legal systems, as evidence for criminal trials. These testimonies rely on the accuracy of human memory to decide whether a person is guilty for a crime or not. This is a very important part of criminal trials since it is a major factor on the fate and future of a person's life. Quite noticeably, memory is an important, and significant, factor in eyewitness testimonies. At …show more content…
Based on this statement, this essay will investigate the reliability of memory on eyewitness testimonies, considering points from both sides of the argument. This argument will be discussed by talking about two different studies related to the reliability of memory on eyewitness testimonies, where one supports the idea that eyewitness testimonies are reliable, while the other opposes it. This will then end up with a conclusion that shows the extent of which memory is reliable in eyewitness testimonies.

The first study that will be seen is Loftus and Palmer's (1974). Loftus and Palmer claim that the nature of questions can influence witnesses' memory of an experience. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of leading questions on an eyewitness testimony of the event. This was done using the following method; Participants were shown several videos of car accidents, which ranged from five to thirty seconds. After each video, the participants were given a questionnaire which asked them to give an account of the accident. There were a number of questions which included the critical question, "How fast were the cars going when they

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Eyewitness Testimonies

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    AFRICAN AMERICANS WRONGLY CONVICTED 3 Why Are African Americans More Likely to Be Wrongly Convicted in the United States? Introduction Imagine, you are just minding your business walking down a street and an officer stop you to bring you to the station to question you. The next thing you know you are being charged for a crime you didn’t commit.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, memory schemas can affect eyewitness testimony. For example, as stated in Matlin’s Cognition (2012), past view point or schemas can affect present day perceptions. If an eyewitness consciously or unconsciously believes that a certain group of individual are more violent or are more likely to commit crimes than that schema can cloud their perception of the crime they witnessed. Cognitive psychology has extensive research on why eyewitness testimony is unreliable. Holloway’s argument could have been stronger if she incorporated some findings on eyewitness testimony by cognitive psychologists.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There have been many wrongful convictions due to faulty memories. However, these eyewitnesses believe that their memory is true, even if some of it is false. These memories could be wrong for a number of reasons: information from other places, combining some of the gathered information with…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although our brains have the capability to store a near infinite amount of memories they are not always reliable when it comes to retrieving these memories. Often times when eyewitnesses describe what they saw, their memories are false or unreliable. These accounts are unreliable because of proactive and retroactive interference. The book says that proactive interference is when past memories interfere with the present. This could affect eyewitness accounts because if the eyewitness was in a witness of a crime before, they could mix the two crimes together and possibly accuse the wrong person.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supporting arguments used in this article to support the thesis, as mentioned above are the four hypotheses that are stated regarding false recall and recognition. The…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When crimes occur, police and investigative officers rely on eyewitness from people that were close to the crime scene. Eyewitnesses then rely on their memories of what occurred during the crime. An eyewitness recalls the event they might give the wrong information and details of what happened because our memories are not perfect and the identifications that eyewitness make can be fallible. Eye witness is important to investigators because they can identify suspects and provide crucial information that is not seen by everyone, but their testimonies can have significant consequences to people. An example of this would be the wrong conviction of Francisco Carrillo.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eyewitness identification relies upon the eyewitness memory and the ability for him or her to retain that information and reporting it straight to the police. Memory is considered as evidence because information is being gathered and encoded in memory. Over time the storage holds in the encoded information in the brain until retrieval occurs so the brain can have access to the information. Although memory is not accurate, errors can occur throughout the process of encoding, storage, or retrieval. Even images and sound can deteriorate over time, which makes it hard to recall them back.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fact that memories of witnesses and victims can be inaccurate, even though they believe them to be true has and important implication in the legal system (Loftus, 2003). It might be difficult to believe that people will confess to a crime they did not commit, and will actually create a false memory for having committed the crime (Leding, 2012). An example is the case concerning a Central Park jogger, where five teenage males were accused assaulting and raping a woman. Due to an intense and lengthy interrogation, all of the boys falsely confessed to committing the crime. The boys were convicted of the crime; however, they later denied their statements (Kassain & Gudjonsson, 2004).…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They thought about the process the witnesses go through, the crime, and the questioning from the police, the lawyers, friends, family and possibly health care professionals. With each time they re-tell the events they might hold something back, depending on who they're talking to. They're vulnerable to a lot of negative reactions and they're scared that it could change relationships with close ones so they might leave some details out. With that being said, the brain no longer refers to the event as a source of memory, but the last time they though about it, so they could have distorted their memory or it could have been contaminated (applied cognitive psychology). Eye witnesses should be an advantage due to them being able to tell exactly what happened but with their being so many ways to easily distort or contaminate their memory they can be come unreliable and can lead cases at court to have a lower chance of conviction, however not only the eye witnesses cause cases to be exonerated, the juries have a lot of factors surrounding them which cause them to get things…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constructive nature of memory is one of the reasons for the unreliability of eyewitness testimonies. The human brain does not record all the things that people see around them. Instead, the brain collects different pieces of information that are relevant to the situation. Consequently, eyewitness accounts may be flawed because as the brain attempts to reconstruct different bits of information, it might omit vital details (OpenStax College, 2016). The scenario is better understood when comparing human recollection to playing a video recording.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An issue in developmental psychology that is a common topic of research is the question of whether or not the testimony of young children can be trusted. Can they recognize perpetrators or even remember events accurately? The answers to these questions should inform how children are questioned as eyewitnesses in the courtroom, and since many people aren’t as educated in this topic, it important for a policy to be implemented to ensure that findings from recent research are being used to effectively utilize children as eyewitnesses. There are three main topics of applicable research that I will discuss in this paper, and they are: use of initial exhaustive recall to avoid retrieval-induced forgetting, eye closure in recalling events, and repeating…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One cognitive process that involves questioning of reliability is memory, it should be questioned because there are many factors that can affect it, for example: social activity, medical diseases/disorders, emotional problems etc. Eyewitness testimony (EWT) is a legal term, that refers to an overview given by people of an event they have witnessed. In cognitive psychology EWT is an important area of research that can give insight to human memory. In this answer we are going to evaluate to what extent is eye-witnessing testimony reliable, using relevant research studies by Loftus & Palmer (1974) and by Yuille & Cutshall (1986).…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cognitive Interview Essay

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By doing so, the interviewer can retrieve cues to facilitate recall. For example, if a witness states they are having difficulty remembering a face, they talk through this difficulty. The interrogator can then use the given information to cue retrieval. Similarly, the witness is instructed to report all details of the event, preferably from different perspectives and different directions (Kohnken et Al., 1999; Willis et Al. 1999). This idea stems from Tulving’s encoding specificity principle; the goal here is to find the ‘golden road’ to the event via trial-and-error (Kohnken et Al., 1999).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This question gains its importance from the view that nearly every aspect of our cognition depends on our memories to some degree; especially our working memory (Baddeley, 1992). To understand many of our cognitive processes (problem solving, cognition, attention, etc.) one needs to understand the abilities and limits of memory. This information also translates into practical reasons as well. We rely on our memories to make judgements on significant events ranging from eyewitness testimony, to winning an argument with our significant other over who said what.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eyewitness

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In situations where a weapon was included, the eyewitnesses normally inclines to concentrate more on the weapon and not the individual holding it, regardless of whether they were wearing a veil. Lorenza (2003) argues that weapons and firearm savagery are specific territories of worry for this situation. This is because of the stun of seeing the weapon, witnesses tend not to take a look at the substance of the assailant, thus making witness testimonies unreliable. Since they didn't totally concentrate on the substance of the culprit, they will incline to fill in the crevices with appearances or body highlights that are basic among suspects or just power their memory to incorporate the presume captured by the police (Lorenza, 2003). It is normal…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays