Explain Why There Is There No Democracy In The Middle East

Improved Essays
Why is There No Democracy in The Middle East?

If you give a person a fish they eat for a day and if you teach them how to finish they will never go hungry. There is no democracy in the Middle East because America and the rest of the Western influencers are imposing democracy on the Middle East. If you get rid of a dictator, military leader, and other types of leadership, you cannot expect for democracy to rise up in one’s place. The only place where democracy was created as a first regime and actually was successful was in the United States due to the fact that we had leaders who understand what needed to be done and sacrificed to have democracy work and become successful for years to come. To bring democracy to the Middle East, we must instead
…show more content…
They are searching for the wrong enemy. The Middle East looks jumbled up and unorganized. There seems to be no hope and no clear thought or idea of what the next moves needs to be for the people to create peace and unity in the Middle East. You cannot thrust a government such as democracy in a war zone such as the Middle East because by doing that it is destroying a very delicate political system. Democracy worked in the United States because the people who were in charge of ensuring this political system was not going to fail had to make sacrifices and had to learn not to put power before everything else. Power is how you take down a democracy. Power is good, but having too much power gets to one’s head making it impossible for that person to share. Democracy is all about delegating and allowing people to have different opinions. To ensure the survival of democracy, a leader would have to be open to new ideas, thoughts, complaints, suggestions, and so forth. However, because the leaders that have already been put in charge have felt the power and instead of delegating the power have wanted it all for themselves and became selfish with it destroying the hope of it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Too much power can crash the society and ruin the government. SInce the public…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As President, Thomas Jefferson Sought To Set a Democratic Tone and to Reduce the Role of the Federal Government *****ALL ARTICLES AND QUIZZES MUST BE COMPLETED AT THE ASSIGNED READING LEVEL********* Jefferson’s Democratic Style 1. Jefferson was determined to make the government more democratic. Democratic means: in a manner in agreement, or supporting the democratic style. Primary source: “Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they preserve them……..…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Basically the group feels it is invincible and can do no wrong which often leads to excessive optimism and the taking of severe risks. There was evidence of this when the Bush Administration did not weigh out the factors of a postwar Iraq nor draw up any kind of feasible policy in accordance to likely emergence of an insurgency. They believed once the war was over it would just be a matter of a quick hand-off. General Shinseki, the former Army Chief of Staff, had proposed several hundred thousand soldiers. His view was that a significant ground force presence would be required to counter ethnic tensions of postwar Iraq.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Palestinean Prime Minister, Ismail Haniyeh, has said, “Anybody who asks for a democracy to be introduced should respect the results of democracy.” Because I agree with Ismail Haniyeh, I stand in firm affirmation of the resolution, Resolved: The United States ought to promote democracy in the Middle East. For simplicity in the debate today, I would like to offer the following definitions: According to the BBC world news, the following countries are considered to be middle eastern: Bahrain, Golan Heights, Iran, Iraq, Iraqi Kurdistan, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can you prevent lone wolf terror attacks? Lone wolf terror attacks are caused by private individuals; therefore, lone wolf terror attacks cannot be fully prevented without invading civil rights. In the case of Anders Breivik, a Norwegian lone wolf terrorist, caught the entire country off guard with the most merciless terrorist attack in Norway’s history, killing 77 people. He was a man who was considered a normal, and a happy person; however, when he was captured, his laptop was searched and on it, the police found his plans and manifesto of how who and why he was going to kill.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Napoleon

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “One bad general",“is better than two good ones”-Napoleon. In my own inclination, I believe the perspective we have in today's society about having people that are both types; the selfish and the selfless is entirely valid. I still agree with Hobbes, as he preaches that we should have a government that is dictated by one person. However, I disagree with Locke becasue he says that the government should be run by more than one person. On the other hand, I can agree with Locke because he says that humans can be respectful and selfish.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would argue that during the cold war and after, the US goals and strategy were and still are neocolonial, but the purposes for being neocolonial changed. In the cold war, the plan was to prevent any nuclear detonation from either side and win by attrition of sorts. Not of troop numbers but by having a country more dedicated to its way of life and capable of sustaining itself long term, this was evident when the Soviet Union bankrupted itself and collapsed. Neocolonialism makes a lot of sense. You get to control other people with minimal military involvement compared to keeping a standing military force typically needed in each controlled country.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. The USA is a democratic republic where people decide who is in charge (the democratic part), then the people elected decide what to do (the republic part). Democracy is considered more fair than other governments. Voting is a good way to establish legitimacy for a leader because they can argue their right to rule on the grounds of being elected. This promotes political stability.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Belarus Controversy

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early 1990’s came the fall of the famous U.S.S.R. in Europe/Asia. The U.S.S.R. stood for the United Socialist Soviets Republic that had control over 15 various countries for many years in their conquest of promoting communism. In 1991 it all came apart, and with it the split of its nations. Belarus is most notably one of these former Soviet satellites that has since struggled in developing democracy in their country. Belarus is listed as a republican government by many but the truth is that the power does not lie with its people.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democracy favors smaller organizational entities, such as the state or the town hall meeting. It is very difficult to deliberate among 6 billion people, and one need only look at the UN to realize that the larger an area an organization encompasses, the less democratic it tends to be. With so many distinct cultures on this earth, it would be a shame to lump them all together and subject them to the will of the majority whose moral outlook they do not share. The continued existence of the celebrated diversity of this planet and the democratic ideals they hold dear depends largely on the existence of a plurality of…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political System

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Which political system is better for a country? Each country have different needs, cultures, history, strengths and weaknesses to take into account in order to find the appropriate system. The aftermath of war in Iraq, when talking about politics, was focused on asserting control over the country, the next step in order to rebuild the country is establishing a representational system, the majority believe that democracy is the system to follow, since a democracy is not a unknown concept for them, but the success of democracy depend on whether the United States take into consideration the unique social and communal population or the system was chosen because it have been prove to work for them. A confederation is an alliance of sovereign states united for common objectives, this system is supposed to unite the different colonies, states or factions.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The article declares that among the countries that are in some transitional phase between dictatorship and democracy “fifty percent do better on political liberties than on civil ones” (Zakaria). The author Fareed Zakaria called these countries illiberal democracies. According to him this form of democracy is typical for non-Western countries which embraced it from France (the French model). Although these countries are democracies, according to their official form of government, but in practice the leaders of these countries abuse the power and the citizens have many of their rights limited or violated. All the power is usually concentrated in the hands of one and the same person.…

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that the United States already has been trying to spread the principles of democracy for a while now. It is a major foreign policy goal that we exercise regularly, and for the most part I’m okay with the U.S. spreading it. When I think of democracy I think of it more than just the typical political sense of being able to vote for our leaders. It is our social ideals, economic structure, and so much more. And I think promoting it and spreading democracy involves promoting different humanitarian ideals and human rights for all, protecting our natural freedom, supporting a strong system of law, and of course free election.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Within each historical era, there is a dominant form of rule, from tribal affiliations to individual kingdoms to vast empires to, now, democracies. In the twentieth and twenty first centuries there has been a pattern of democratic forms of government emerging all around the world. Asking whether all of these are in fact true democracies is inconsequential; rather one should instead focus on why this trend is occurring and question the validity of the spread of democracy as the prevalent form of rule in the present era. There is no way for democracy to claim universal validity as the legitimate form of government throughout the world. The very notion that democracy could be universal, universally valid, or universally legitimate is impossible…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Democracy Essay

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Not only do the people have zero power to interfere in the governing body, but they sometimes are persecuted due to their beliefs, race, language and religion. Therefore, democracy is the best policy to adapt to balance out the involvement of minorities and majorities in affairs other than…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays