“One bad general",“is better than two good ones”-Napoleon. In my own inclination, I believe the perspective we have in today's society about having people that are both types; the selfish and the selfless is entirely valid. I still agree with Hobbes, as he preaches that we should have a government that is dictated by one person. However, I disagree with Locke becasue he says that the government should be run by more than one person. On the other hand, I can agree with Locke because he says that humans can be respectful and selfish. I believe that humans are an incredibly smart species; that strive to get stronger. We are a species that loves to adapt whatever, the circumstance may be. Every single year we are looking into ways on how to improve
…show more content…
Everyone envisions, that by voting we have a say in what happens. Although in reality, we have no clue. When people take their vote their outcome may turn out to be anything. None of the citizens can see the actual marking process. In other words, how is that different than a dictatorship. In a dictatorship, one person is selected into power. There is no difference, as ultimately the better one gets chosen. A lot of countries that do have a democratic government are hugely corrupt, as people are forced to vote. If you look at countries in the middle east and Egypt; there was a total of 97% of those who voted for Abdel Fatah al-Sisi. 97% seems oddly a lot for one president. The only way that could have remotely have occurred if the election was rigged.Even in the past year, American people have even claiming that the recent election was tampered with. What is even having the title of democracy, if you are not technically voting for anything at …show more content…
It's true, he viciously tortured and killed thousands of jewish people during the holocaust. An act that could never be forgiven or forgotten. However, that does not make him a bad dictator. Contrary to popular belief, Hitler was the one who took the Nazis that were defeated and rose them up and created an intense armed military. The man was able to manipulate people to fight against all odds and win a handful of battles. Alluding back to my primary considerations about human nature, was the fact that humans are very courageous. He brought back the strength from many germans. As humans, we are a resistant force that always puts up a fight. He was able to unlock the courage inside of every german. A duty that many dictators have successfully accomplished, but the same can’t be said about democratic parties. His downfall was that he was an esthetic fanatic. His overconfident behaviour was what lead him to his demise. Therefore, all the power he gained made him a powerful and dangerous Dictator. Another famous dictator was named Stalin. He unfortunately took the lives of many, although he was the who made Russia, one of the biggest powerhouses we know today. Stalin’s reign made an remarkable progress during his time there. When Stain first came into power he started when Russia’s economy was really poor. During his five years he not only improved Russia’s economy, but started
Everyone envisions, that by voting we have a say in what happens. Although in reality, we have no clue. When people take their vote their outcome may turn out to be anything. None of the citizens can see the actual marking process. In other words, how is that different than a dictatorship. In a dictatorship, one person is selected into power. There is no difference, as ultimately the better one gets chosen. A lot of countries that do have a democratic government are hugely corrupt, as people are forced to vote. If you look at countries in the middle east and Egypt; there was a total of 97% of those who voted for Abdel Fatah al-Sisi. 97% seems oddly a lot for one president. The only way that could have remotely have occurred if the election was rigged.Even in the past year, American people have even claiming that the recent election was tampered with. What is even having the title of democracy, if you are not technically voting for anything at …show more content…
It's true, he viciously tortured and killed thousands of jewish people during the holocaust. An act that could never be forgiven or forgotten. However, that does not make him a bad dictator. Contrary to popular belief, Hitler was the one who took the Nazis that were defeated and rose them up and created an intense armed military. The man was able to manipulate people to fight against all odds and win a handful of battles. Alluding back to my primary considerations about human nature, was the fact that humans are very courageous. He brought back the strength from many germans. As humans, we are a resistant force that always puts up a fight. He was able to unlock the courage inside of every german. A duty that many dictators have successfully accomplished, but the same can’t be said about democratic parties. His downfall was that he was an esthetic fanatic. His overconfident behaviour was what lead him to his demise. Therefore, all the power he gained made him a powerful and dangerous Dictator. Another famous dictator was named Stalin. He unfortunately took the lives of many, although he was the who made Russia, one of the biggest powerhouses we know today. Stalin’s reign made an remarkable progress during his time there. When Stain first came into power he started when Russia’s economy was really poor. During his five years he not only improved Russia’s economy, but started