Alexander is deserving of the name “the Great” because he conquered all the land also, He was very giving. In document A ,it states “He conquered 11 cities and put them in his name ” Also, in document A he had about “40,000 men”. “This is shows that he is great because he was able to conquer and put them in his name also he had over 40,000 trustworthy men. In document E , It states “he was giving ”. It describes in source D he was giving by saying “He poured the water on the ground performing a miracle”.…
This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…
After Alexander's sudden death in 323BCE, Politically, the huge power which he created became unstable. Therefore, his military leaders…
What makes a man or woman, great is their intelligence, concern for others, and leadership skills. To be great though you must have all these traits. It’s like the characteristics of life in science, the item must have all the traits to be alive. If the item does not have one, then it is not alive. Alexander the Great does not deserve the title of great, although he has intelligence and leadership skills.…
Alexander the Extraordinary Caris Daneker Pd. 8 In 336 B.C., there was a man named Alexander, from Macedonia. Alexander is now more modernly called “Alexander the Great”, for he did great things for the world and made history. Alexander did something so amazingthat the common man of his time would only dream about what he accomplished in only a decade!…
Alexander had no good reason to waste water. Even in today’s society, water is one of the most valuable resources to human beings. This also shows that Alexander wasn’t even nice to his own soldiers. He demonstrates its when, “His men did not wish to go with him but preferred to stay here… Hindu Kush”(Doc F).…
Alexander showed no mercy to innocent people, or even his own men. Although history has credited Alexander the “great” with building the largest empire the ancient world has ever seen, few realize his cruel,…
Identification and Evaluation of Sources The purpose of this investigation is to answer the question: To what extent did the military tactics and empire-building strategies of Alexander the Great influence the culture and later rulers of Europe? This source is a video about Alexander the Great from Youtube, a video sharing website, that is part of the Crash Course World History video series.…
Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…
The Death of Alexander the Great, he is described Alexander the Great as, “This military genius from a small, unimpressive kingdom to the Northwest of Greece, had raged like a wolf through…
During his path to capturing much of the world he had been egotistical and self-centered. When he worked to move from place to place, Alexander expected people to obey his commands. According to the article “Alexander the Great “ For their stubborn resistance, the inhabitants of the city were slaughtered and the survivors sold into slavery.” This shows that Alexander cared very little for the people he conquered. He worked very to ruin their civilizations and their lives in general.…
No other commander has come close to equalling Alexander’s conquests. Although Alexander ruled an expansive empire by the time he was 25 years old, he had higher ambitions. When he died at age 32, Alexander's empire was the most extensive state of its time, covering approximately 5.2 million square km. Alexander’s most immediate legacy was the introduction of Macedonian rule to large areas of Asia.…
Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…
The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…
As Alexander did desire the praise of men, he more so aimed for a self-fulfillment, becoming a living god, as well as overshadowing everyone to have come before him. Clearly his goals were not to incite his men to praise him, but rather to fill his own ego. Alexander was an irresponsible ruler, who did very much want men to praise him, but only looked for the praise through his accomplishments, not matter how hard those accomplishments were on his own men. This can lead one to believe that rather than men’s praise, Alexander was insatiable only for performing greater and greater achievements, and desired that his name would become immortal to time by any means…