Explain Why Alexander Was Not Great

Decent Essays
I think that Alexander was not great. In document C it says “Alexander ordered all to be slain. The air grew thick with smoke from burning buildings. Seven thousand Tyrians died.” This concludes that Alexander was cruel and savage. Then in document D it says “Alexander said thank you for the water, then dumped it on the ground. The water could have been use for a drink for his whole army.” This proves that Alexander was not fair to his army and was brutal to them. Finally, in document E it says that it took 11 years to make Alexander’s empire. It also says that the empire lasted 10 years after Alexander died. This means that it took longer to make the empire than ruling it did. These are the reasons why I think that Alexander was not great.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After Alexander's sudden death in 323BCE, Politically, the huge power which he created became unstable. Therefore, his military leaders…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What makes a man or woman, great is their intelligence, concern for others, and leadership skills. To be great though you must have all these traits. It’s like the characteristics of life in science, the item must have all the traits to be alive. If the item does not have one, then it is not alive. Alexander the Great does not deserve the title of great, although he has intelligence and leadership skills.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Extraordinary Caris Daneker Pd. 8 In 336 B.C., there was a man named Alexander, from Macedonia. Alexander is now more modernly called “Alexander the Great”, for he did great things for the world and made history. Alexander did something so amazingthat the common man of his time would only dream about what he accomplished in only a decade!…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander the Great, born as Alexander III of Macedon, was a King of Macedon who was known as one of the most brilliant military generals in history. He created a vast empire stretching throughout Europe and Asia. He lived from 356-325 B.C.E., and during that short time, was able to create a nearly unstoppable military force that never lost a battle while Alexander was alive. The son of Phillip II, he was able to continue his father’s mission to make Macedon into a powerful military and economic force. (Walbank, 2016)…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was worthy for his title. In the text it states,” The prince took charge in companion cavalry at age 18… Alexander became king of Macedonia at the age of 20.” This quote proves my opinion because he was in charge of the cavalry at a very young age, and he was responsible for the cavalry. Another piece of evidence to support my claim is,” Alexander’s army consisted of 40,000 soldiers… by a lion.” This quote proves my claim because he had lots of people in his own army that would protect Alexander’s citizens.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No other commander has come close to equalling Alexander’s conquests. Although Alexander ruled an expansive empire by the time he was 25 years old, he had higher ambitions. When he died at age 32, Alexander's empire was the most extensive state of its time, covering approximately 5.2 million square km. Alexander’s most immediate legacy was the introduction of Macedonian rule to large areas of Asia.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is not that great because nothing is cool about putting his military in many wars and pressure. According to article “Study Say Alexander Not So Great.” “A young Alexander the Great thundered across what is now the Middle East on a bloody mission that ranks among the most brilliant military conquests in history. ”(#1).…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death of Alexander the Great, he is described Alexander the Great as, “This military genius from a small, unimpressive kingdom to the Northwest of Greece, had raged like a wolf through…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Alexander did desire the praise of men, he more so aimed for a self-fulfillment, becoming a living god, as well as overshadowing everyone to have come before him. Clearly his goals were not to incite his men to praise him, but rather to fill his own ego. Alexander was an irresponsible ruler, who did very much want men to praise him, but only looked for the praise through his accomplishments, not matter how hard those accomplishments were on his own men. This can lead one to believe that rather than men’s praise, Alexander was insatiable only for performing greater and greater achievements, and desired that his name would become immortal to time by any means…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays