Deontology Theory

Better Essays
Although being okay to collect, track and record social media data, by law enforcement, it can be a breach of privacy and unconstitutional in certain situations. For those who support social media data collection argue on the basis of promoting safety, but they forget that the officers who collect these data are human beings and sometimes they can be biased. First, some officers may collect social media on racial biased basis and only aim one particular race to collect data from. Also in some instances officers may turn a blind eye when they discover that people whose data being collected belong to their race, certain class, and political influence. In addition, lack of proper training may incriminate and prosecute a wrong person. …show more content…
Deontology theory condemns the action of collecting people’s information without consent. On the article, “Ethical issues In Electronic Performance: Consideration of Deontology and Teleological perspective”, G. Alder voices how philosophy argues with regard of invading someone’s privacy (G. Stoney, (1998). Deontology theory sees us acting in a particular way and performing actions regardless of consequences. In this regard, according to deontologists if something is wrong it’s always wrong, no matter how you try to frame it. Deontology begs us to act morally and when performing duty the moral law should always be obeyed. Therefore, to invade another person’s privacy, claiming you are performing duty is immoral. Also Kant’s categorical imperative dictates us how we should act towards each other. The categorical imperative under its three principles; the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in a Kingdom of ends, reminds us that morals should be applied in all situations with no exceptions. It also tells us that we can never use humans as a means to an end, but consider them as unique creatures with human dignity. And finally on categorical imperatives, it dictates us to treat other people as we ought to be treated. Therefore to sum all these we found the collection of social media data, violates the moral law in that the exercise don’t apply morals in both situations. The exercise only focuses on safety and to criminalize somebody, but not considering the innocents and their privacy. The action of collecting social media data is definitely treating people’s information as a means to an end. And we cannot cause harm and reduce other people’s freedom and privacy to benefit others or to make others happy and others unhappy. Happiness is for all, regardless of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Which Pojamn rules as impossible through a subjective lens, then Pojman posits that conventionalism cannot possibly work to resolve cross-cultural issue through the lens of conventionalism (Fieser 49). He postulates that there is a better suited ethical theory. Which he affirms is moral objectivism, the view that there exists as least one moral principle that all societies and cultures can adhere to. Pojman attempts to prove that there is a universally valid moral principle that is binding on all rational agents and he posits that if an individual does not adhere to this principle, this individual is stupid and…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I am exactly like this, everyone has their own opinion, practices and beliefs, we cannot use our standards to judge another’s morality it is just ethically wrong. It is ethically wrong because what we may think is morally right, maybe morally wrong to them. I believe we should all live by ethical practices and value because there are so many different cultures and beliefs, we should not let one thing guide us towards…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don’t like being judged, which results in people not taking responsibility for their actions. I disagree with how Fromm relies on the comparison of our options to our humanistic conscious, morals and the laws of humanity to guide our actions. What if our values are subpar? If someone has little to no morality and believes that he is bettering the future of humanity with his actions, then according to Fromm’s logic, they have justified themselves by obeying their personal morals and how they interpreted the laws of humanity. This could mean that a seral killer felt that his actions were justified as an act of freedom against authority.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Disobedience In Society

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper defends the right of citizens to consciously disobey laws in their society, after examination. People have a right to form idiosyncratic beliefs through their own conscience and rationality. Individuals should demonstrate the values they believe are worth losing their life, liberty, and property, through their actions. The actions they choose should not cause irreversible damage. People, compelled to act must do so regardless of the justness of their society.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whether its for the benefit of innocent people or sadistic satisfaction, it should never be justified. It alters a person's life to the worse. Every human should feel safe. If they are withholding information then it's their choice and they have a right of choice. Governments should not violate those human rights because they are the ones who should protect the people.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant believes that every person has rights and their own autonomy, so lying to them is treating them as a mere thing. There is no valid reason to lie about this action other than the fact Pat most likely regrets it, and fears losing Chris. Therefore, this maxim cannot be applied as a universal law, because it is rationally incoherent to make a maxim a law that is based off of self-interest. Since it cannot be applied universally, and telling Chris the truth would have greater moral worth, it is concluded that according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative Pat should tell Chris that she cheated out of respect and to follow her duty to him as his significant…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How you respond to disrespect in everyday life is a proper test of morality. In this test, you’re graded based on your ability to counter improper treatment with respect for no purpose other than its moral correctness. Additionally, the possibility of respecting another individual is obsolete without attempting to visualize their perspective. Understanding one another is the key to mutual respect as well as broadening your moral knowledge. Lastly, uninformed perceptions of others defeat all attempts to respect them as it doesn’t allow for the understanding or empathy of our cohorts.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kantian ethics is a form of deontological ethics, meaning evaluating actions to see whether they are morally just or not. Kantian ethics is a type of deontological ethics because it is the view that we have absolute moral duties that are determined by reason and not affected by the consequences. Valjean, if shown from this view, would turn himself in. He would know that it would be morally wrong to lie and that lying is never justified, even if the townspeople have prospered so much under his ruling. He would know that morality must be grounded in reason and that an innocent man must not be put away for an action Valjean himself has committed.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the main points of Kantianism is that All persons are treated as moral equals. Furthermore, Kantianism proposes two categorical imperatives; I have chosen to use the second one for this analysis. The imperative is written as this: “Act so that you always treat both yourself and other people as ends in themselves, and never only as a means to an end.” (Quinn, 2015) Plainly stated, it is unethical to use another person as merely a stepping stone on the pathway to reaching an ultimate goal. So under this premise, not only is the CDA unethical, but all censorship that includes the monitoring of citizens must be unethical. The government will use the citizens as a means to end in order to invoke the censorship.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This argument establishes that it is immoral to kill, harm and eat marginal human beings. Since, for utilitarian’s marginal human beings and animals have equal importance, we must treat them equally. (2014 The Fundaments of Ethics, p.132) In other words, we must not do any action against animals that we would not do to a marginal human being. On the other hand, we have Kant’s ideology. Indeed, Kant thought that rationality and autonomy is what make one member of the moral sphere.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays