Essay On Zimbardo's Theory Of The Prison Experiment

Superior Essays
Zimbardo decided to conduct the prison experiment because of his interest in social psychology. He was influenced by the milligram experiment that left a great impact on him as a person. According to Zimbardo, he said that he wanted to expand on the Milgram’s experiment and focus less on power authority and obedience. The prison experiment mainly focused on the human behaviors when asked to play a certain role in society. The experiment also resulted in the degeneration and breakdown of human nature, raising more questions about the darkness of the human nature. Zimbardo’s experiment created a lot of controversy among people, but still studied by other another psychologist to this day. Zimbardo’s experiment gave a lot of information about the …show more content…
The power of the environment showed how it can change, and transform normal people’s personality to evil. Zimbardo chose his participants to be normal, intelligent, educated, bright college students in order to make this experiment officiant. He chose those certain college students to reflect the average individuals in society. Twenty-four college students who took part in the experiment were randomly assigned their role as guards or prisoners. Zimbardo also spent a great deal of time with the details of the prison such as the appearance and the cells. the uniforms of the guards, and the entry process for the prisoners on the first day. All of these components were planned by Zimbardo to create the most realistic prison environment. The experiment was done in 1973. “He consulted the “guards” in such a way: “You can create in the prisoner’s boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they’ll have no privacy…We’re going to take away their individuality in many various way” (Ramos 2). He wanted to take away their privacy, their individuality and make them feel powerless. Basically, he wanted to do these things to the prisoners to get the most out of them, abuse them indirectly to see what would they do. To make those participants have fear, he had real cops arrest the participants from their homes. They were handcuffed and taken by police …show more content…
Peer pressure and conformity (the tendency to follow others) played a massive role in the experiment. How the guards turned from normal people to adapting other behaviors. On the second day, the guards started to implementing physical punishments and forced the prisoners to do physical exercises. This shows that the guards took the experiment to a different level because even though there were given instructions to not physically hurt the prisoners. They started implying their own rules, Zimbardo had told them as they will be watching the prisoners he will be watching them. Zimbardo being the superintended of the prison, he should have did something when he saw the guards physically hurt the prisoners, but he didn’t he wanted to see how the prisoners would handle the situation. The prisoners stared rebelling, but the guards quickly stepped in and physically hurt them. That was the first step in seeing the guards abuse their powers day by day.” I fell into that role, and in that role, I observed guards brutalizing prisoners – in some cases sadistically… And I did not stop it” (Sparkman 2). Because Zimbardo didn’t stop the guards the first time. They thought it was up to them to decide how far they were going to take it. That lead to the guards to think that if no one told them they shouldn’t be doing this, or if no one was stopping them. This showed how people respond to a cruel environment without

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo wanted to see how quickly the guards would adapt to their role as actual prison guards and assert their authority and dominance on the prisoners. He saw that they adapted too quickly; they developed the “authoritarian personality” (pg. 231). The prison guards tormented the prisoners so much that Zimbardo had to end the experiment after one week instead of…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we look ahead, however, it is an important question to consider. The boys who participated in Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment did not suffer any lasting affects. Had the experiment not been discontinued, however, who knows what might have occurred. When conducting psycological experiments, it is important to protect the subjects from lasting harm. If we loose sight of that goal, we loose more of our humanity than research findings could ever provide us…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine you are a student at Stanford University in the 1970s, and you hear that a psychologist is offering $15 per day to take part in his experiment. You figure that you could use the extra cash and figure that it’s a good way to help out. You and 20 other students are accepted to participate, and you are split into two groups, prisoners and guards. The only instructions given were “...do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners. No physical violence [is] permitted.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (2008, p.282) contended that the Zimbardo experiment emphasize that it is the situation in which people find themselves and not their personal trait that largely determine their behaviour. They added that Zimbardo (2007 as cited in Baron et al. 2008, p.282) suggested that it is the tendency to yield to situational pressures, including conformity pressures that is responsible for much of the evil behaviour exhibited by the prison guards in the experiment and that people readily conform to the social role which they are expected to play, especially if they are stereotyped roles like those of prison…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo’s account of the Stanford Prison experiment provides his intent to determine whether the power of the situation or another unknown variable sourced report of brutality in prisons. The Stanford prison experiment allowed Zimbardo to embark on a six-day prison experiment to determine the control a prison environment possesses over the human psyche. Zimbardo examines the power of situations to alter ordinary men into sadistic machines, and Szegedy-Maszak provides a logical explanation for heinous actions; however, Zimbardo and Szegedy-Maszak fail to factor in individual responsibility and the perils of dehumanization. Both Szegedy-Maszak and Zimbardo agree that certain situations maintain the power to turn ordinary people into monsters or sadists. Szegedy-Maszak states that the feelings and turmoil of the soldiers were “exacerbated by difficult living conditions and constant danger” (Szegedy-Maszak 76).…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe they experience more unethical issues than Milgram’s. The prisoners wasn’t protected from psychological harm. If it’s just an experiment, why should people become emotionally distressed and humiliated? One prisoner had to be released after one day because of a mental breakdown. Also, Zimbardo wasn’t aware of other things that was going on.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article was written by Seymour Hersh and came out a few days after the 60 Minutes documentary came out about the incident. In his article, Hersh speaks out about the events with evidence from the Taguba report. In Taguba’s report, he documented that this was an inhumane way to treat any prisoner. In firsthand accounts of the study, Zimbardo and other participants give their take on the study and how it went wrong and where it was eye-opening. Christina Maslach was the whistleblower at the Stanford Prison Experiment when she came to visit the experiment and question Zimbardo on how he could let something like this happen.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was under Philip Zimbardo’s leadership that the Stanford Prison Experiment took average, everyday boys, like Prisoner number 8612, and made them believe they were trapped in a real life prison. It was August 14th, 1971, a Sunday morning when the prisoners were arrested. Each of the nine boys were taken from…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Zimbardo's prison experiment is 46 years old it, the findings were so punctual that it is still talked about today. Zimbardo lead the experiment in 1971 with Craig Haney and Curtis banks. The experiment was conducted in the basement of the psychology building, which they converted into a small prison block.. The Experiment was originally scheduled to be conducted for a 2 week period but due to the results Zimbardo was getting they cut the project at just 6 days. Somewhere of about 75 students had volunteered to be apart of the psychological study, and only 24 had been chosen to participate.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners were treated as a real inmate would be, they wore uniforms, ate prison food, and slept in cells. On the other hand the guards wore reflective sunglasses, uniforms, and conducted daily activity in the “prison”. This experiments effects set into place so quickly that what was meant to last for two weeks only lasted six days due to the extreme effects on both the prisoners and the guards. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine Zimbardo states, “They start off playing a game, and then there is a point at which they each, one by one, flip and become more and more extreme.” (Zimbardo).…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wore a uniform that would give anyone the impression that it was not a good idea to cause trouble. Once the experiment began, they were given very little instruction as to what they should be doing, or how they should react towards the inmates. Their only rule was that there was to be no physical punishment. At first, everything was calm, almost too calm. Too calm in fact that the head of the project, Phil Zimbardo, was beginning to become frustrated with the calmed nature of the situation.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If I was Zimbardo, I would have firstly set up some sort of guidelines for the guards. Rules against physical and mental abuse would be set into place to combat the breaking of Standard 3.04. With rules set into place preventing harm, the major amounts of stress and sadness exerted on the prisoners would have been avoided. This would have prevented emotional breakdowns that occurred to many prisoners in the real experiment. Another change I would make, would be towards my role as the sociologist.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays