Pros And Cons Of Living In New England

Improved Essays
If I was a poor uneducated white twenty-five year old male from a farm family in england around 1730 and I was given the choice to settle in one of the following; the New England, the middle, or the southern colonies, I would choose the New England. I would choose this region mainly because eliminating the south as a place to settle is easy because of how difficult life was there compared to New England.
Environmentally, the climate of the New England Colonies were much more cold than middle and south colonies given it was the furthest north. The positive side to the cold climate was the prevention of spreading life-threatening diseases, versus the majority of people in the south died from the airborne diseases. The negative side to cold climates are severe winters which killed many people. Also, the geography of New England negatively affected farming because it was mostly hills with rocky soil making settlers have a short growing season. Settlers were able to have a sustainable lifestyle because they had enough food for themselves, but not as much in terms for trade. Another environmentally positive
…show more content…
They brought animals such as pigs, sheep, horses, and cattle. This called for many more-larger grazing areas, resulting in a bigger loss of the forests’ shade, resulting in more extreme summer and winters. Because of these more-intense winters, the snow melt was eating away at the grazed lands, erosion and drought soon became a big problem. Agriculturally, the environment played a large role in the economy in the New England Colonies given that farming was not as important for making a living given the circumstances. The biggest difference between the New England colonies and the Southern Colonies were in the agriculture, New England colonist imported agricultural products whereas the Southern colonies exported agricultural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout 1600 and 1700 the Chesapeake and New England colony regions advanced into unique societies. The development of each area was influenced by religion and their use or lack thereof of indentured servants. One main difference in the regions was their difference in geography. The Chesapeake colonies all had the right land to grow tobacco, and they prospered from it. Many of the farmers in Chesapeake, had their own land with indentured servants.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Southern Colony plantations started to plant cash crops like tobacco eventually sending it to Europe. This made them more of an Agrarian culture than New England with a religious beginning. The Southern colonies were started for economic purposes and they…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Englanders desired a place where they prosper together as a community. They were more than concerned about the moral health of the whole community and would do whatever was called for to keep their community strong and happy. " This court … in the interim recommends [that] all tradesmen and laborers consider the religious end of their callings, which is that receiving such moderate profits as may enable them to serve God and their neighbors", DOC. E, this shows that they would give their money away to help their fellow man.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When comparing the geographical condition and climate provided to each colony, the Chesapeake colonies had much more fertile soil and softer climate than those of New England. Therefore, the colonies in Chesapeake and the South had a better condition to grow any kind of crops they wanted to grow. However, since New England had a rockier soil and harsh climate, they were only able to grow crops such as corn and beans, which did not cost much. In contrast, the colonies of the Chesapeake Bay grow tobacco as their main cash crop and exported them. They were able to make their economy dependent on the agricultural aspects.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chesapeake and New England colonies had two different and distinct societies. If I had to choose between the two I would choose New England as a place to live. New England was family oriented men, women and children moved to the area. Which means that they had the ability to be more stable and efficient as a community. A family could contain many skills as opposed to the few elite men and their servants may have.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In New England, due to poor soil, no cash crops could efficiently be grown. Therefore manufacturing was the prime income. For example the construction of ships was a lucrative business. Additionally lumber and fur was a main trade item in the New England colonies.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New England was less ethnically mixed than its southern neighbors because of the difficult landscape. European immigrants were not attracted in great numbers to a site where the soil was stony. It was rare for an African slave to live long enough to be worth the sizeable financial investment. The cost of a slave was roughly double that of an indentured servant. The Southern colonies had more access to fertile grounds that the New England terrain lacked.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, New England and the Chesapeake Bay areas had many contrasting qualities including their religion, population, and economies. The key reason that these two regions…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, the life expectancy in north was much greater than the south. Many people in the northern colonies lived longer because of its clean water source and cold temperature which slowed down the spreading of diseases. The economy of northern colony was mostly industrialized while in the southern colony, agriculture was an important factor because of the fact that the south had a much better fertile soil than the north.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harbors were located throughout the region. The area was not known for good farmland. Therefore, the farms were small, mainly to provide food for individual families. New England flourished…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though the slaves lives were harsh, they still had land ownership which they say makes it worth it. To conclude, agriculture, geography, and economy helped the Middle Colonies survive the early stages of its development. “The experience of ages has shown that a man who works on the land is purer, nobler, higher, and more moral... Agriculture should be at the basis of everything. That's my idea,”…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the 1700s, the New England and the Chesapeake regions developed into two different colonies due to each colony’s reason for settlement, consisting of religious and economic reasons, their personal beliefs, and their growth in their society. While the settlers of New England immigrated to the Americas to escape religious persecution, the settlers of the Chesapeake region immigrated for more economic reasons—the search of gold. Each colony’s way of life contrasted from one another in the way they lived in their societal systems. The impacts of these differences evolved the colonies uniquely. Documents A and D reveal the religious motivations behind the New England settlers’ settlements.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in the early 17th Century, English settlers scattered themselves along the eastern coast forming some of the first clearly defined regions of the United States. While both the New England colonies and the Chesapeake colonies had deep-seated aversion for the natives, they differed in their religious homogeneity and economic policies. The New England colonies were strictly Puritan whereas the Chesapeake colonies followed no universal religion; also, while the New England colonies relied on fishing, shipbuilding, and farming, the Chesapeake colonies relied on their strong tobacco based economy. Although both regions were eventually conquered by the British and forced to merge as one nation, the New England colonies and the Chesapeake…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Each region had a different climate and advantages which affected their economy and society. People found ways to use the sources that they had to make a profit. In spite of differences, people came to the New England Colonies, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies because people saw an opportunity for a better life. The colonies were the place where they could escape government and religious oppression and an opportunity to become wealthy. It is fascinating how colonists created their own economic system based on the sources that was within their region and created a new society in a place they knew little about it because they wanted to have a better…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the geographic differences between the Northern and Southern colonies, the development of their economies was based off of different goods and services. In the South, with its “temperate climate and long growing season” (Davidson, et al 88), colonists found that the soil was fertile and therefore suitable for the large scale growth of first, tobacco, but later other crops including indigo, rice, and cotton. Southern colonist could grow these crops essentially all year as the temperature in the region remained the same. Unfortunately, the geography of the region did not allow for “good harbors and navigable rivers” (Davidson, et al 74), ensuring that the Southern colonies would remain mostly agricultural. In contrast, the Northern colonies…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays