Government Vs Centralized Government

Superior Essays
Stemming from the idea that humans are inherently fallible is the idea that mankind requires some guide to define morality and control its wills. When a government is established within a community, that entity becomes the lawmaker and the law enforcer, and this system is upheld as long as it maintains the safety and prosperity of its people. So one must then wonder: in order to maintain order, must a government be centralized and authoritative, or can the success of a civilization solely rely on interpersonal agreements between people? That is to say, must there be an enforcer of law? I believe that a supreme government is now necessary to provoke an atmosphere of prosperity within a society.
To address the philosophical question: Do people
…show more content…
In modern times, the necessity of government seems self-evident. As a structure it facilitates commerce, produces educational standards, and keeps citizens safe. Thinking practically, this last role of government is the most important; a society cannot flourish if it is originally kept from growing. …show more content…
He establishes his case with a utilitarian’s viewpoint, explaining that a good government’s main purpose is to promote safety for as many citizens as possible, that they may find benefit in life. He maintains that this can only adequately be done with a supreme national state of some form. John Jay mainly forms his argument by saying, “… qualifications will be necessary to recommend men to offices under the national government…” and maintains that a national government will make more moral decisions because it has a larger pool to pick its legislatures and commanders from. It seemed that a more just society is then more safe, “… more wise, systematical, and judicious than those of individual States…” because better qualified officials will better resist the temptation of harmful foreign affairs (Jay 95). He also brings up the fact that under the Articles, the United States had no centralized judiciary system, therefore laws might be unfairly enforced state by state or ignored completely. Before the ratification, America saw its first uprising with the actions from Shay’s Rebellion. America’s failure to have proper tariffs and establish good national credit caused farmers to lose money, which eventually prevented them from paying their state taxes. These people were the true stakeholders of society, lenient on a government with no inherent-power to bail

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is human nature to naturally be evil and we must have government to maintain and regulate society, in order to prevent citizens from trumping others rights. Ideologies is a “prescription for society based on personal values.” A truly objective political ideology is almost impossible, but if it can be sensitive to the individual and best promotes their cooperation towards mutual ends. Ronald Reagan was a modern conservative who proposed many changes to how he thought…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the government according to the Thomas is the institution that provides protection to the human kind from their vices. Which means that, it’s the responsibility of the government to disseminate equal rights to all people that exist in the environs. In his arguments on common sense, Thomas made some strong points that are more value up to date. One of the persuasive point is that; he said ‘’ people are happy with the laws they create’’. which means that when certain rules are imposed on the public without their knowledge, then dissatisfactions are going to experience, and that’s why Paines is one of those who are the anti-monarch type of…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lao Tzu thinks the Way is the origin of everything. Even the ruler has to follow the Way so that he will not try to control his people. Nevertheless, Machiavelli believes a successful sovereign should be powerful. No matter what kind of government they suggest to be, balance keeps a vital key to the ruler. Since the ancient and peaceful society no longer exist, Machiavelli‘s suggestion is more effective.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security. Laws and moral codes must be backed up by force because a society works best when people work together rather than trying to gain individual dominance over another. Since society is like a “social contract”, it is believed that punishment is necessary otherwise people would break the rules every time it was in their interest to do so. Absolute sovereignty is the ideal government because, according to Hobbes, is most able to keep the peace. Civil power is used to force everyone to follow what they have agreed to in terms of the “social contract” to protect us from ourselves.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many philosophers have contemplated on the freedoms that men should naturally have simply for being human. Among those are the right to self-preserve and the right to equality. Along with these freedoms believed by a handful of philosophers to be God-given rights, complementary government hierarchies are set up for the good of the people and also to protect these freedoms. Without the government systems, humans would spiral into chaos and disorder; this is why it is necessary to have a government set up. Because humans are incapable of living together harmoniously, Rousseau/Thoreau, Hobbes, and Locke discuss different types of government systems, or lack thereof, discussed in their writings, all still impede on the natural freedoms that men…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “[T]he severity of penalties is only a vain resource, invented by little minds to substitute terror for that respect which they have no means of obtaining” . Thus, according to Rousseau the government should make the laws match the general will of the people additionally instead of using punishment and terror the government should try to prevent it in the first place and “establish the reign of virtue” , which will contribute to the prevention of crimes in the state. The term “morality” has a huge importance within the limits of the state and especially the civil state that is conducted upon the social contract. In order to reach mortality citizens need to become virtuous and come together for the common good and the general will of the state. When Citizens understand the significance of laws to their common good, they will start to respect them and act accordingly to their duties.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    stake, which would be in good favor of the general public as they have pure intentions. Individuals would be given more power, more involvement, and more freedoms to make a difference in our society and help diminish automatic government. Unlike another of Howard’s reforms, such as giving more power to the president, the people would become supportive of this reform as they personally benefit and power is given to them and not a single individual. Social acceptance of this reform would be high, it is directly benefitting individuals and it would create more involvement within our society with higher enthusiasm. Politically, officials would benefit as well as they could act in situations instead of filling out paperwork and waiting for orders…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The importance and sovereignty of a state having the power to decide what is right for their own state is expressed in the address ,but with the example of slavery shows, people's freedom and choice ends when that choice is unjust and infringes on other people’s rights and a strong national government needs to have the power to police states when choices like that are made. Federalism is important in being the voice and power of reason. Some choices that are not infringing on other’s rights and only need to happen at state level make sense in supporting anti federalism, but there needs to be a balance between the two just as there is the problem with antifederalism there are holes in federalism. Balance between power each government has…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Steatism Vs Neoliberalism

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Statism approach emphasizes strong actions by the government to support and manage the system of production and distribution of goods. Some states believe that the government is overstepping and prefer at the Neoliberalism approach. This approach encourages economic freedom of individuals, households and firms. However, most countries find success in finding a balance between these two approaches. For example, each president in the United States forms different economic policies in hope of maintaining a stable economic system.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism Vs Realism

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (Plattner, 1998). Liberals are more optimistic about the world and believe that man is inherently good, and that all states can unite to make positive change, progress and ensure survival at the same time. Impartial to Democracy comes Realism, Idealism emanates Liberalism. By way of explanation, Liberalists believe that there is a goal to be reached- that human beings can change the course of all things. Realism does not believe in this form of cooperation and progress; it only wants to survive.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays