Summary Of John Smith Poverty

Improved Essays
Smith relates the poverty of many to the wealth of a few by stating one who is very rich must, in return, result in five hundred who are poor (Smith, 96). A system of subordination sets in place to assure that the few stay wealthy and many remain poor. The rich, in particular, are interested in the order of things that can secure them in the possession of their own advantages (Smith, 99). Going along with Smith’s interpretation of the need for a civil government, the poor naturally combine to defend the rich in the possession of their property, in hopes that the rich will defend them in the possession of their own property (Smith, 99). This system allows for a sustained unequal ratio of wealthy to poor individuals.
The four “natural” sources of the subordination of some people to others, according to
…show more content…
If there is no property, or no property that exceeds “the value of two or three days’ labour,” then civil government is not needed (Smith, 96). He states that the shepherds age of society is when civil government began to take root. Smith mentions that it was necessary for its own preservation and the civil government worked naturally despite the necessity (Smith, 98). The poor would combine to defend the equities of the wealthy, in order that the wealthy would come to defend the poor in their own property. The shepherds felt that the security of their herds and flocks depended on the security of the great shepherd or herdsman. According to Smith, “The maintenance of their lesser authority depends upon that of his greater authority; and that upon their subordination depends upon his power of keeping their inferiors in subordination to them” (Smith, 99). The purpose of the civil government is to sustain the security of property, and in return, also to protect the wealthy against the poor, who may wish to rise up and take their property (Smith,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Working Poor Book Summary Three Main Points The Working Poor was written by David K. Shipler. The book gives readers a perspective of what life is like after poverty strikes. Each chapter focuses on either the contributing factors, the causes, or the effects of poverty.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Intent is to mirror demographics described in socioeconomic models of U.S. class structure where the wealthiest and most powerful 1% of the population controls a disproportionate amount of the resources. (Kendall, 2013, p. 226) Whether sociologists’ delineate society using Max Weber’s multidimensional approach where final rank is calculated as a combined figure of sliding scores assigned individually to wealth, power and prestige, or use Karl Marx’ simplified theory based on property ownership, method matters little beyond the scope of formal research. (Kendall, 2013, pp. 224-232)…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Gilded Age, there was a clear distinction between the rich and the poor. Many of the economic elite, Andrew Carnegie included, came to profit from the companies to the point where they controlled the majority of the nation’s wealth. They also came to agree with the views of Herbert Spencer, which was that the “fittest” would use their successes economically to help those in need (the weak); since they were rich, they were fit. This came to rapidly increase the inequality in society as the economic elite became wealthier, leaving a distinct gap between the rich and the poor. For the socialists, the wealth was clearly limited to few individuals and they argued that the wealth of the elite came from those who were working without proper conditions and little pay.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are Janny Scott David Leonhardt trying to tell us about social class in “The Shadowy Lines That Still Divide”? In the article “The Shadowy Lines That Still Divide” by Janny Scott and David Leonhard, that author discuss how people feel about social class and why they has to go through to get what they want in life. That author shows how each people express them self for not having that same rights like others people have, only because they are in a higher-class level and they are not. The majority of the time and even in this day social class has been a big matter for much of the people in the United Stated or others countries.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order for the upper class to cut losses, the lower class had to suffer. Poverty of an individual would lead to suffering and a sense of unfairness where Karl Marx and Samuel…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment Dbq

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, a philosopher named John Locke believed that the people had the right to choose their government and change it if they so pleased. “When the government is dissolved, the people are at the liberty to provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative…”(Doc A) This means that if the people did not feel like their government was providing and leading properly they could discard the previous government and start again. This would be highly beneficial because if the government failed they could not only get rid of it but prevent it before it became inadequate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery And Inequality

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Howard Zinn’s, A People’s History of the United States, discusses the upbringing of the United States, particularly in the terms of slavery and inequalities among races; he tells the story of the country and the problems that accompanied it. Within the book, it is shown that there are inequalities between economic class, race, and gender, each expressing superiorities and inferiorities. These disparities contribute to the idea that the Declaration of Independence should have clarified “all men are created equal,” in the fact that it meant wealthy, white men. One specificity of “all men are created equal” is being rich, which should have been clarified because being wealthy was viewed superior to being poor.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth inequality in today's society also known as the wealth gap, is growing. The top one percent makes twenty-five times more than the average family (Close 2016). This glaring inequality frequently brings up the question of what ought to be done with the distribution of wealth and resources. American Political Philosopher, John Rawls’, bases his argument on the premise that there should be an equal distribution of wealth in society. Robert Nozick, one of Rawls' main critics, demonstrates how distributive justice and an equal distribution of wealth conflicts with a person's individual liberty.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 19th century, America was faced with the problem of poverty. Two of the groups experiencing poverty were immigrants and African Americans. When immigrants came over to America, most were unequipped with the skills necessary to adapt and become “American,” resulting in them living in their ethnic communities in the poorer areas and being unable to get out of poverty. On the other hand, African Americans faced poverty because of the effects of slavery and racial discrimination. Reformers and self-advocates attempted to help these two communities.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early modern writers as diverse as John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government and Karl Marx in Capital attribute inequality to the social dominance of one force such that it eclipses other forces’ abilities to function as they might otherwise; a ‘domination disrupts nature’ thesis. Both Locke and Marx identify money as one such dominating force. This dominance applies not only to money being the end of transaction, but also to the dominance of the means of transaction, with corresponding ramifications for the items being transacted. For example, Locke notes how the accumulation of wealth allows people to store more than they require, leaving relative deprivation in times of scarcity.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Income and Wealth Inequality of America As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening?…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut is the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities start to form. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as they begin to compare their strengths and abilities of others. Although Rousseau argues that the invention of private property is not natural, it is inevitable as it becomes a necessity due to certain circumstances such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between the wealthy versus the poor and played a significant role in the creation of…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a particularly important argument because it is the belief that there is domination in society by one group or class in society. When considering poverty, it could be argued that the domination of the rich upper class and middle class could lead to a division in society that separates the poorer members of society. An example of this could be poorer individuals who live in areas that have been overtaken by more affluent members of society. As property prices rise, so do rental prices and other services in the area. This may place further strain on poorer individuals and this could divide them even further from those in other…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays