Whether the argument is to boycott them completely or versus allow them be fully integrated in the market or to just not even care at all, is all up to each and every individual’s choice. On another hand, can the same be said for the use of genetic engineering directly in human cells? As previously stated, the field of gene engineering in humans is still a fairly new practice though it is steadily gaining a foothold in the scientific …show more content…
The society that he was born into in allows for people to specify what kind of hair color, eye color and skin color they would like their offspring to have. In addition to physical features, they are also given the chance to “eradicate prejudicial conditions such as premature baldness, myopia, obesity, etc..”(Allot). As the first child to his parents, they’ve initially decided to let nature take its due course in deciding his fate but overtime as Vincent grew, his father becomes frustrated that Vincent wasn’t born the “perfect” son he wanted. When the time came, Vincent’s parents decided to have another son, but only this time, they decided to eliminate his future imperfections and chose his traits themselves. As the embodiment of the perfect son, Anton became the center of attention and love from his parents- casting Vincent off to the side. Eventually, this neglect lead Vincent to harbor jealousy and resentment against his own family to the point where he eventually flees his home for the pursuit of his dream. Overall, the film allows for the audience to reflect and analyze the cost and impact of deciding their children’s fate. Is it morally ethical to do so for the sake of the kids or is this simply an excuse of the