Dred Scott's Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
STEP 5 → Put your essay together below, review it, and revise! Be sure that your arguments are clear and well-supported by evidence with in-text citations. America was and is known as the “land of the free.” But American was not always a free country for all those who lived in it. African-Americans were not treated equally to any whites who lived in America in the colonial time period. In the South, slavery was a dominant way people lived, either you were a slave, or a slave owner. Slaves had to suffer harsh conditions, as they were not viewed as apart of American Citizenship nor considered humans. Free or not, African Americans were never created equally to white Americans at this point in history. The Declaration of Independence only seemed to apply to a certain group of men, that group did not include African-Americans. According to forbes.com, under the Declaration and Constitution, blacks had “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” At this time in America's founding history, African-Americans were never to be treated as people, as they were property to their owner and slaves to everyone else, they were not to be considered as anything more. It was only normal that every white male were to own their own slaves primarily in the South. Because this was common, before the Civil War nearly 4 million black slaves toiled in the American South. One of the worst historical resolutions in America was the time of slavery. In colonial times African-Americans were treated with zero respect as human beings, especially in the South. Most masters viewed their slaves as they did their land- “thing to be worn out, not improved” according to Living Conditions of Slaves. Masters only provided what was needed to keep their slaves healthy and able to complete the work that needed to get done. All slaves commonly lived in rough cabins crowded together. Slaves were not legally allowed to live or be with their real families. They wore clothing made of coarse homespun Lin or “Negro cloth.” Slaves worked from dawn to dusk, and dealt with harsh and inhumane punishments if the work done did not meet their masters expectations or needs. While, escaping was an option it was not …show more content…
Slavery was no longer as dominant as it was in the South, in fact, slavery in the North was abolished at this time. However, African-Americans in the North were still not treated as equally. Even though blacks were free from slavery in the North they still could not have the same rights or freedoms that whites had had at this time in America. One of the most controversial events preceding the Civil War was the Dred Scott case. This case argued the fact that any free African-American was still not respected as an American citizen.According to history.com Scott argued that time spent in a free state entitled him to emancipation. But the court decided that no black, free or slave, could claim U.S. citizenship, and therefore blacks were unable to petition the court for their freedom. African-Americans still were looked down upon even in the North. They could not yet vote or get certain jobs when whites could. Even though the North finally considered African-American males as men and not property, “all men are created equal” still did not proceed to apply to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the persuasive article by Scott Anderson, the rhetor puts together an argument using the six components, Exordium, narration, partition, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion. He claims that minors should not be put into the adult system yet he strives more for people to ponder the situation at a much higher level of thinking. The exordium is used to grab the attention of the audience and show he is worth listening to. Since it is a difficult case, Anderson must use an insinuation. The insinuation is needed to ease a hostile audience into listening.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the years following the civil war, many southern states and cities passed Black Codes. These laws laid out what freed Blacks were and were not allowed to do. In the aftermath of the Civil War, the policy of Reconstruction was developed for the purpose of reconnecting the eleven states that had left the union and welcoming the millions of freedmen (former slaves) as full American citizens. During the Reconstruction battle, African Americans weren’t free because they still had no rights, they weren’t treated fairly and they were constantly harassed. African Americans were not free during the reconstruction because they were prevented from executing their rights.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blacks In The South Dbq

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through President Lincoln signing the Emancipation Proclamation, blacks were free from slavery but they did not have complete freedom because they did not have the same rights a whites. Through 1777 people still question slavery until 1865 where slavery was abolished. Blacks in the north were not free in the years just before the Civil War because of political, economic, and social rights. Blacks in the north where not free just before the civil war because of political restrictions. For example, doc.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Ruling In the Supreme Court’s decision on Dred Scott’s many consequences brought tension surrounding the issue of slavery in the United States. “In the case, the Supreme Court rules that Scott was still a slave, and therefore, he had no right to file the suit in the United State court as he was not a citizen and did not have any legal rights” (Horton). This case may have been the one of most controversial in American history due to the fact that it deals with such a disputable topic as slavery. In this paper, I will discuss legal and cultural events from the Dred Scott v. Sandford case that may have flared the start of the Civil War.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Case Essay

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With hesitation, the Supreme Court decided to hear Dred Scott vs. Sanford. Two northern justices had decided that they would argue Scott’ s freedom and the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise. Since Dred Scott and his family lived in a free state, but where still being treated as slaves, aroused the question, are they free or are they still slaves? Dred Scott believed that since he resided in a free state, that made him free. In Article four of the Constitution it states that any slave who…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Reconstruction of The United States after the Civil War, there is still controversy on whether or not the African-Americans were free in The United States. Although it appears that the former slaves and immigrants were free, and lived the same typical lives as anyone else after the 13th amendment was passed, the start of the Black Codes, whites behavior, and the 13th amendment itself contradicted any thoughts that blacks could be free in America at this time. After the 13th amendment was passed, in certain regions, Black Codes were enforced. Black Codes were laws that held a strong reign on black people.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War DBQ

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court ruled that slaves were property and therefore couldn’t sue which caused a huge dispute about the court and freed slave’s rights in court. An article said, “The case eventually rose to the level of the Supreme Court, where the justices found that, as a slave, Dred Scott was a piece of property that had none of the legal rights or recognitions afforded to a human being” (Document 3). This ruling shows how socially, any enslaved person is considered property. Even in free states, an enslaved can’t sue for their freedom so there was no reason to have the free or slave states if they wouldn’t let someone gain their freedom in a free state. One might argue that the white Northerners would be antislavery but the table shows that it was only a portion of the Northerners who were against slavery (Document 8).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of the civil war left the south in ruins, freed slaves, and the beginning of the Reconstruction Era. African Americans had a lot to gain through the outcome of the civil war, although life wasn’t as they envisioned it. During the reconstruction era slaves were given rights with great limitations. At best they were treated as second-class citizens. Some African Americans felt that they would be better off returning to the farms where they were slaves, due to extreme the racism and struggle for work.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the South, reconstruction after the Civil War could have been considered a failure. This is because after the war freed slaves would still live on the plantations that they were freed from and work as sharecroppers. Also with the African Americans free, they wanted to start finding out what happened to their loved ones who were sold away from them. The other problems that they were facing though were racism and hate because of which they were, even though the South would claim that the war was not over slavery, but over states’ rights. In the North on the other had African Americans still experienced racism, and hate because people were scared that as they moved north they were coming to take away the jobs of the northerners.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    African Americans have a long and difficult history in the United States. They were once property that could be bought and sold. They once had separate water fountains, bathrooms, and schools than whites. They had to fight for their rights in America and even though they have as many rights as every other American under the letter of the law, there are areas in which they still have to deal with undo ridicule, harassment, and injustices in our society.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reconstruction Period

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The American civil war was one of the biggest hardships for the young country to endure, and yet it did not prepare them for the tension after. Slavery was the biggest conflict between the Northern states and the Southern states, this what lead us to civil war. Between these national crisis it was the breaking point for the young country. Reconstruction was needed and the period following the civil war, the reconstruction period, fostered many significant results and achievements especially for Constitutional amendments. While mending a broken country, the reconstruction period still left many fresh wounds.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom by definition is the right to do what you want without anybody stopping you. This however, can mean different things to different groups of people, whether it be a race, religion, or even gender. Three groups of people that had issues with achieving the freedoms most white American men had were, African Americans, women, and immigrants. Each of these groups fought hard for the freedom they have today, but even so they are still fighting the upwards hill of oppression. The meaning of freedom for African Americans has drastically changed over time.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analytical Essay on the Emancipation Proclamation The United States of America has had an aggrieved history of slavery about African Americans. African Americans at this contemporary are descendants of Africans who were force from their homeland and brought here in the United States as slaves. During the United States slavery era, slaves were consider properties of their master. At the United States’ constitution convention, it was very much explicit and adhered to by the founding fathers by accounting 3/5 of black persons to be equivalent three persons, that which denigrated black people as human beings. The southern states of the United States were deeply interested in slavery because of their labor on the southern plantations.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays