Dred Scott Case Essay

Improved Essays
The Dred Scott case was a very important time in United States history, politics, and American Law. In the 1800’s, unlike the northern part of the country, southern states underwent slavery. The Dred Scott case was a case that dealt specifically with slavery; the case began with a slave wanting freedom for he and his family. Like most slaves Dred Scott was born into slavery, in 1799 and didn’t get out until Emancipation Day. Dred Scott was born in Virginia to a slave master by the name of Dr. Emerson, an army surgeon. His current owner had taken him for many years to Illinois and to Fort Snelling, in the Minnesota territory which were both free states at that time due to the Missouri Compromise. Scott had sued Emerson in Missouri, but that case got dismissed because he could not prove …show more content…
Following that, a new trial arose and Scott had won the case, but Emerson appealed. Not to shortly after Scott and his family were granted their freedom, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed saying that the Scott’s were slaves and they should have sued while they lived in a free state. Both Dred Scott who was 40, and his wife, who was 17 years old at the time, sued for their freedom in 1846, but did not go to trial until 1847. He later was sold to a slave owner by the name of Sanford. At the beginning, Scott had at first won the case, but it started to move on appeal to the state courts, the federal system and after 11 years, the Supreme Courts. With hesitation, the Supreme Court decided to hear Dred Scott vs. Sanford. Two northern justices had decided that they would argue Scott’ s freedom and the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise. Since Dred Scott and his family lived in a free state, but where still being treated as slaves, aroused the question, are they free or are they still slaves? Dred Scott believed that since he resided in a free state, that made him free. In Article four of the Constitution it states that any slave who

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott is a man who was a slave all over the United States. He had first lived in Virginia, where he was a slave. Then his slave owner had moved to St. Louis, and brought Dred Scott with, but set him free. However, he was immediately sold again, but then his slave owner moved to Illinois, where it is technically a free state. However, his slave owner had moved to Louisiana, where it is in the slave state region.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While in office there was the dred scott decision, The Kansas question,Panic of 1857. Which states were admitted into the Union. Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case. The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, the Dred Scott decision empowered proslavery Southerners. The 1854 Dred Scott v. Standford case was brought all the way to Supreme Court and was regarding a slave who lived in an area illegal to slavery because of the Missouri Compromise and was suing Standford for freedom (Brands 2015, 323). This case caused controversy; Firstly, because slaves could not be citizens at the time therefore they should not be allowed to sue a citizen.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision In 1846, after about 46 years of being a slave, I awoke feeling confident and brave. Today I would do something I been thinking about doing this forever. Today I went to the Missouri State Court and I asked the court to be free,claiming that I have lived in a free state and territory. But, the court claimed I was still a slave.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dred Scott Court Cases

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott an enslaved man from Missouri. After the death of his first master – Peter Blow, Dred Scott was sold for John Emerson was an army surgeon. The second owned took him into Illinois and Wisconsin, where slavery was banned by Missouri Compromise 1820. In 1836, Dred Scott got married to Harriett Robinson was also a slave. They had four children: two boys died infancy and two girls.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott escaped slavery from the South just to face even bigger problems. He had the chance to argue his case in court, and was sent back to slavery because he was considered as “property.” This case also showed that the Union somewhat supported slavery at the time, not allowing Scott to go free. “Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” - Abraham Lincoln. According to the constitution, all men are created equal, and this case completely opposed…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Research Paper

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Childhood and Education Dred Scott was a slave and his life was very different from other white kids. His birthday is unknown, because he was a slave and nobody cared about slaves birthdates. He was born in South Hampton County Virginia, his parents were slaves too so their names are unknown. When Dred Scott was born his brother had already died and his name was Dred.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the mid-18th century, the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision became a key contributing factor in the separation between the Union and Confederacy going into the American Civil War. With the conflict of proslavery and antislavery groups fighting for new states, this choice became a debated topic within the detached United States for the effect it had in the slavery legal and economic system. Riots transpired and differences between political leaders and Court justices arose as the decision was made. Historical documents, like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the U.S. Constitution, were used within this court case by Chief Justice Roger Taney to lead towards the defeat of Scott.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott was an African - American who was born a slave, in Virginia, during the 1800s. Mr. Scott was a slave to Peter Blow. Throughout Dred Scott’s life, he moved along the West coast with Mr. Blow and all of his property. Mr. Blow died in 1830 and Dred Scott was purchased by Dr. John Emerson. Dr. Emerson, a surgeon in the United States Army, lived on military base in Illinois.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern world, it’s safe to say that slavery was a wrong move that America made, or better yet, a wrong move anyone made. So many african men, women, and children were forced to work day and night under their own will to live, and the thought that people would sleep easy knowing that could only inevitably lead to war. During the 1800s, anti-slavery acts would soon take place, such as the underground railroad, battles, war, but I think one act that is rather overlooked is “The Day of Dred Scott”. Sean Wilentz, an author and historian wrote has written an article about it to what I believe is him trying to get the world to know about this rather faded historical event, and how it actually impacts the anti-slavery movement.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays