Theory Of Mind: Do Animals Think Like We Do?

Superior Essays
Do animals have a conscious like we do? Do animals experience pain like we do? Are they aware of how they’re feeling, like we are? All these questions arise because, for a long time, there has been a debate over whether or not animals can think like we humans do and whether or not they have a conscious. Some arguments have been based on the fact that as humans, we have larger brains, and therefor are capable of more cognitive processing and greater understanding (Bickerton, 2000). Others have relied on the simple observation that humans and animals live completely different lives (Bickerton, 2000). Based on the research that will be presented, it is clear that even though animals and humans live distinctly different lives, their minds work in very similar ways to ours and there is not much difference between the two. The theories that will be discussed are meta-cognition, future-oriented cognition, theory of mind and the ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli as well as …show more content…
However, studies have shown that certain animals, like apes, have the capacity for theory of mind. Theory of mind is when an individual can recognize that their thoughts are their own, and what they know, others might not know (Premack & Woodruff, 1978). In the study by Premack and Woodruff, chimpanzees were presented with different situations in which a human was struggling with different things. For example, in one situation, the human was trying to get a banana that was out of their reach, in another example; the human was shivering because they were cold. The chimpanzees were given a bunch of pictures with possible solutions on them. The chimpanzees chose the correct photo more often than not, which demonstrated that they are able to understand the human’s purpose, the problem and the solution to that problem (Premack & Woodruff,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    MONKEYLUV: A CRITICAL REVIEW As I picked up picked up my AP Psychology required reading, Monkeyluv by Robert Sapolsky, I wondered what on earth animal behavior could have to do with human psychology. The idea that we could draw connections between the conduct of mice and humans escaped me; I had forgotten that humans were, in fact, animals. Sapolsky does his best to drive this point home as he humorously, yet intellectually, illustrates the idea that humans and animals are often more similar than we’d like to admit, and how by studying their behavior, we might better understand our own. Just who exactly is this man to be shattering my worldview?…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but it is found at many different levels of animal life. Consciousness is referred to as being able to know what it’s like to be that organism. In this way, consciousness is a subjective experience. The most difficult part is obtaining an account of the physical basis of mind. Since the mind is subjective, its associated with a single point of view whereas, if you try to obtain a physical theory,…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rifkin says that philosophers and animal behaviorists have argued about the capability of self –awareness in other animals. While some argue that animals do not have self-awareness because “they lack a sense of individualism”, others beg to differ. A counter statement that Rifkin utilizes is the remarkable actions elephants do when they are faced with a dead kin. Elephants will “often stand next to their dead kin for days,” and occasionally touch “their bodies with their trunks. After contributing to anticipate the common objection, many people would realize that animals are not much different than us.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chaplin and Norton (2015) examined how theory of mind (ToM) affects children’s desire to perform. One hundred and fifty-nine children from various ethnic backgrounds ranging from 3-12 years old completed a preference and ToM task. For the preference task, experimenters told the children to choose 2 activities (one performance and nonperformance) out of 4 activities: sing a song or perform a dance of their choice (performance) and circle red shapes on a paper or color in a square (nonperformance). For the ToM task, the experimenters used 3 tests to measure different aspects of ToM: the Sally and Anne false belief task, the Cookie Box misleading container test, and the Duck and Lion social test. After the children completed both tasks, they…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals Have Souls Do animals have souls? Do people have souls? There are many differing definitions for the soul, and how can you begin to answer any of these questions without a chosen definition? Clarence Darrow’s “The Myth Of the Soul” and my secondary sources will conclude that yes, animals do have souls, and in fact, to think that they do not is much harder to believe.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their work, The Extended Mind, Andy Clark and David Chalmers present the extended mind hypothesis to argue against the idea of the mind consisting solely of inputs and outputs. The hypothesis argues that the mind is not simply an internal thing, but rather that it can exist externally and be part of an individual’s environment. Clark and Chalmers argue for this this by presenting the examples of Otto, a man whose memories and knowledge lie in a notebook, and Inga someone who stores all the information in her mental states. I will argue that the extended mind hypothesis is unsuccessful because there is no clear line of what is actually known and what is only thought to be known. The extended mind hypothesis is the argument that…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s plausible to deny that many animals think and perceive and if they do they must be the one’s sitting in your chair. Since you’re sitting in your chair, and you are thinking and perceiving, you can’t be an…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Describe some research studies which have addressed the issue of whether non-human animals have a “theory of mind ', and explain what these studies have allowed psychologists to conclude in answer to the issue.” Chimpanzees are humans closest relatives and therefore are a good animal to study when attempting to assess whether non human animals have a theory of mind. This essay will attempt to first define what is meant by theory of mind, then will look at three studies and their approaches to researching theory of mind in non- human animals. It will briefly summarise, in turn, what each study attempted to achieve, how the study was conducted, and the subsequent finding of each study, specifically looking at areas of theory of mind which relate to chimps ' understanding of human problem solving and visual perception in both humans and other chimpanzees. “Theory of mind” refers to the way in which people understand other humans as thinking beings.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of theory of mind (ToM) in children involves the ability to recognise the guidance of behaviours by mental representations that may differ from external reality (McAlister and Peterson, 2007). The gradual development of ToM is marked by specific periods of rapid growth that coincide with cognitive developmental periods between three to five years of age. False belief understanding is recognised as a marker of a child’s fully developed ToM, whereby the child is aware that someone will act in accordance to his or her subjective belief, even if it is incorrect (Peterson, 2000). Explicit evidence of a child’s false belief understanding can be observed through False Belief tasks, designed to test the child’s ability to anticipate…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coricelli and Nagel (2009) were interested identifying the neural mechanisms associated with the application of the theory of mind, or mentalizing, where individuals consider the thinking of others to guide their reasoning. Specifically, the researchers investigated the question: Is there a difference in brain activity between low-level versus high-level reasoners? The alternatives for Coricelli and Nagel’s (2009) questions are as follows: (1) It could be that there is a difference in brain activity, either (i) in location or (ii) level of activation, between the low-level and high-level reasoners, or (2) It could be that there is no difference in brain activity for low-level and high-level reasoners.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are Smart Some people think that we are superior to animals but I think that animals are as smart as we are. Pets react to your moods and seem to know just when It’s dinner time! Some animals use tools, communicate and think for their own. If animals can use tools, they must be smart.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Computational theory of mind is the assumption that the mind is what the brain does. It is the idea of how we process information and this fundamental activity of the mind is what makes us intelligent. This theory claims that the way the brain processes information and the way it thinks is computation. The theory assumes that the mind is a system of organs of computation, designed by natural selection to love the kinds of problems our ancestors faced in their foraging way of life, if particular, understanding and outmaneuvering objects, animals, plants, and other people (pg. 21). The mind takes information and turns it into relevant information.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many things that differentiate man from animals: man can create laws and associations, man rationalize the danger in a situation, man reason the intentions of someone. None of these, or any others similar to them, would be possible without conceptual thought. By reducing the mind to the brain and its activities, the two materialistic theories (monism and moderate materialism) cannot include the intellect. No one has discovered an organ of conceptual thought. Moreover, if our cognitive function is reduced to merely a brain, then it seems impossible to account for any difference between a human’s brain and an animal’s…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays