Social Differences Between New England And Chesapeake Colonies

Improved Essays
Fundamental Differences between the New England and Chesapeake Colonies

During the 17th century, the English were leaving their country by the hundreds, all with different motivations to go to the New World. If you were headed toward New England, chances are you were a Puritan trying to escape religious persecution, and you valued family and unity. If you were headed toward the Chesapeake colonies, you were likely an indentured servant headed to work on a large plantation, or you were a farmer with dreams of wealth and prosperity. These separate dreams and mindsets shaped the two large colonies, and it lead to large differences in their individual politics, economy, religion, and their social mind frames.
The political differences between the Chesapeake and New England colonies were not as drastic as some other deviations. Although, they did have some unique distinctions, due to their differences in religion and economic standpoints. In the Southern colonies, the warm and mild climate allowed bacteria and virus ' to
…show more content…
The gap between social classes differed from the north to the south, due to a distinction in morals and economic foundations. The Chesapeake colonies were built on the ideal of becoming a Great Planters, which caused a riff between the upper and lower classes. Great Planters were also much better off, as they had the most land and the benefits which came with that land. In the north, everyone attempted to treat others equally, regardless of social standing or amount of political power. Everyone was given a "convenient proportion for a house lot...[and] a share of the meadow or planting ground." Everyone started off with the same amount of land and respect; social mobility was the cause for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Chesapeake region and the New England colonies were very different in how they were created and how they were successful; however, being successful is how they were alike. They both struggled and had to overcome obstacles on their way to success. The brutal wilderness that made up the Chesapeake region prompted a slow start for the early settlers. Diseases, such as Malaria, dysentery, and typhoid, ran rampant among the early colonists, cutting ten years off of the life expectancy of new colonists.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chesapeake had a rural environment, which made school and churches more strict and challenging. There were no puritans. The Church of England was established. There was no slavery because there was an aristocratic atmosphere. There were 75% indentured servants.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer Dennis Mr. Reagan AP United States History 13 September 2012 Compare and Contrast: New England and Chesapeake Settlements The founding of the economic and social footprints in America began before it was even a country during the period of colonization before 1700. These colonies were split up into two main portions, New England and the Chesapeake Bay areas. And though these areas share a few of the same characteristics, the key differences between New England and the Chesapeake Bay are what made each region unique. While New England was formed for religious purposes, Chesapeake Bay settlements were formed mainly for economic gains.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The differences in motivations for coming to the New World greatly affected the way these two settlements functioned and developed. There were two central reasons for England’s drive to create colonies in the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The beginnings of these two colonies are very similar. Both colonies had a majority of people who migrated from England. The northern and the southern colonies had similar characteristics but these colonies were very different when it comes too geographically and politics. Geographically these two colonies were on opposite sides of America so naturally, they had different climates. The northern colonies were much cooler than the south.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This, in turn, created more families and in time, the environment for childhood would become safer, since life expectancy was more stable. Combined with legal charters to land from actual colonial authorities, a strong family could be now be built with their own homes. As for the political situation, in the Chesapeake, politics were dominated by those who owned land and positions of power. In New England, it was much more democratic, since the Congregational Church was formed. Town meetings were even created allowing adult male colonists to discuss town matters and address problems in the…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the foundation of the colonies beginning with the founding of Jamestown until the beginning of the Revolutionary War, different regions of the eastern coast had different characteristics. Once established, the thirteen British colonies could be divided into three geographic areas: New England, Middle, and Southern. Each of these had specific economic, social, and political developments that were unique to the regions. New England Colonies: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode, and Connecticut. These were known for being rich in forests and fur trapping.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They shared the same work ethic to make their colonies thrive! The New England Colonies and Middle Colonies had many jobs crops, and people to make their colonies flourish! The Middle Colonies and the New England Colonies way of life was similar and different in many ways. Even though these two colonies had many differences they all had one thing in common, they all worked very hard everyday, and it all payed off. The Middle Colonies, and The New England Colonies flourished with crops, jobs, and many people living and working there!…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the 1700s, the New England and the Chesapeake regions developed into two different colonies due to each colony’s reason for settlement, consisting of religious and economic reasons, their personal beliefs, and their growth in their society. While the settlers of New England immigrated to the Americas to escape religious persecution, the settlers of the Chesapeake region immigrated for more economic reasons—the search of gold. Each colony’s way of life contrasted from one another in the way they lived in their societal systems. The impacts of these differences evolved the colonies uniquely. Documents A and D reveal the religious motivations behind the New England settlers’ settlements.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While geography in the east ranged from coastal plains to rolling hills (piedmont) farther inland. - The tidewater left minerals on the tideland, which made the soil fertile, with this the warm and moist climate allowed for a perfect combination for growing cash crops. Although colonists who lived in the backcountry weren’t as well off as the people who lived in the tideland because the soil wasn’t as fertile. -Broad rivers located throughout the region were an exceptional source of transportation. -Massachusetts was founded by Puritans seeking religious freedom in 1630, since “England had fallen on evil and declining times” -Thomas Hooker and his followers, seeking religious and political freedom in 1636, after a dispute with Massachusetts, founded Connecticut.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Northern colonies (Massachusetts) was economically, morally, and socially superior to the Southern colonies (Virginia). The Virginia and Massachusetts colonies couldn’t be more different; they were founded on completely separate ideals, they had different ways of producing revenue, and they were inhabited by completely different people. Although the colonies were immensely different, they also had some similarities; both colonies showed great violence towards Native Americans and both colonies were very set on gaining as much profit and wealth from the new land as possible. Overall both colonies were awful, they treated other humans like they they were savages and didn’t think twice about it.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Southern colonies all have similarities and differences between their reasons for settlement and daily lives and culture. Each of their governments contributed to the American democracy that we have today. The New England colonies were colonies around Rhode Island and the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They mainly consisted of people from England who were looking for religious freedom.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two colonies were both settled by English and operated under a version of Christianity. They both suffered through disease, and starvation but in different ways.. Jamestown and William Bradford both had some type of government. Jamestown had the House of Burgesses which was the first representative government and Plymouth was self government with the Mayflower Compact, which they agreed to obey all laws. These two colonies were both different but yet also very similar.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in the early 17th Century, English settlers scattered themselves along the eastern coast forming some of the first clearly defined regions of the United States. While both the New England colonies and the Chesapeake colonies had deep-seated aversion for the natives, they differed in their religious homogeneity and economic policies. The New England colonies were strictly Puritan whereas the Chesapeake colonies followed no universal religion; also, while the New England colonies relied on fishing, shipbuilding, and farming, the Chesapeake colonies relied on their strong tobacco based economy. Although both regions were eventually conquered by the British and forced to merge as one nation, the New England colonies and the Chesapeake…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the geographic differences between the Northern and Southern colonies, the development of their economies was based off of different goods and services. In the South, with its “temperate climate and long growing season” (Davidson, et al 88), colonists found that the soil was fertile and therefore suitable for the large scale growth of first, tobacco, but later other crops including indigo, rice, and cotton. Southern colonist could grow these crops essentially all year as the temperature in the region remained the same. Unfortunately, the geography of the region did not allow for “good harbors and navigable rivers” (Davidson, et al 74), ensuring that the Southern colonies would remain mostly agricultural. In contrast, the Northern colonies…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays