However, his arguments against wealth and their effects on social progress aren’t accurate. First, he states that material wealth corrupts morality and slows social progress. Yet, he doesn’t recognize that culture has risen with economic expansion, which we have seen during time periods such as the renaissance age. Secondly, Gandhi says that people with more wealth have more flexible morals, but he neglects the idea that there could be multiple factors that cause people, rich or poor, to be immoral. Finally, we hear the argument that our treatment of the environment shows the lengths in which we will be immoral for wealth. However, we have seen businesses turn away from harmful means of production to a healthier alternative. Ultimately, Gandhi is wrong when he says that wealth and morality cannot mix. Wealth does not decay or halt moral and social progress in the societies of the
However, his arguments against wealth and their effects on social progress aren’t accurate. First, he states that material wealth corrupts morality and slows social progress. Yet, he doesn’t recognize that culture has risen with economic expansion, which we have seen during time periods such as the renaissance age. Secondly, Gandhi says that people with more wealth have more flexible morals, but he neglects the idea that there could be multiple factors that cause people, rich or poor, to be immoral. Finally, we hear the argument that our treatment of the environment shows the lengths in which we will be immoral for wealth. However, we have seen businesses turn away from harmful means of production to a healthier alternative. Ultimately, Gandhi is wrong when he says that wealth and morality cannot mix. Wealth does not decay or halt moral and social progress in the societies of the